Contribution of inorganic components to osmotic adjustment and leaf folding for drought tolerance in pearl millet

Pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum, is capable of adapting to severely dry environmental conditions. In order to elucidate the mechanism of adaptation to highly dehydrated conditions, we selected both tolerant (IP8210) and susceptible (IP8949) accessions from a total of 15 pearl millet accessions and characterized their morphological and physiological responses to severe drought stress. When these selected accessions were stressed with a severe drought treatment, the leaves of IP8210 exhibited upright folding, a response that effectively reduces the evaporative surface area of the canopy. On the contrary, the leaves of IP8949 exhibited wilting and did not appear to adapt to the drought stress. In comparison with IP8949, the capacity of osmotic adjustment (OA) was greater in both younger leaves and stems of IP8210, while their decrease in relative water content was different. IP8210 accumulated higher concentrations of NO 3 - than IP8949 in response to drought stress. In addition to inorganic solutes, several organic components such as sucrose, glucose, quaternary ammonium compounds, and amino acids including proline were also accumulated. IP8210 tended to accumulate more amino acids, typically due to the accumulation of asparagine and proline, while IP8949 accumulated more soluble sugars. While it is possible that K and NO;' were the major componepts contributing to osmotic regulations, sugars and amino acids might also function as a cytoprotectant, in addition to their role as osmoprotectants. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the morphological adaptation of leaf folding, OA in both the younger leaves and the stem, and the accumulation of NO 3 - and amino acids during earlier stress period contribute to superior drought tolerance that was exhibited in IP8210 of pearl millet.

[1]  A. Sturm,et al.  The sucrose-cleaving enzymes of plants are crucial for development, growth and carbon partitioning. , 1999, Trends in plant science.

[2]  A. Jagendorf,et al.  Inducers of glycinebetaine synthesis in barley. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[3]  L. Schrader,et al.  Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid , 1975 .

[4]  P. Saradhi,et al.  Proline accumulation under heavy metal stress , 1991 .

[5]  S. Lutts,et al.  Salt stress effects on roots and leaves of Atriplex halimus L. and their corresponding callus cultures , 1998 .

[6]  R. Borchert,et al.  Water status and development of tropical trees during seasonal drought , 1994, Trees.

[7]  D. Garrity,et al.  Inheritance of Root Characters and their Relations to Drought Resistance in Rice1 , 1985 .

[8]  Yanhong Tang,et al.  Flexible Leaf Orientations of Arisaema heterophyllum Maximize Light Capture in a Forest Understorey and Avoid Excess Irradiance at a Deforested Site , 1998 .

[9]  J. Morgan Osmotic components and properties associated with genotypic differences in osmoregulation in wheat , 1992 .

[10]  J. Lampe,et al.  Organic acids as sources for drought-induced proline synthesis in field bean plants, Vicia faba L. , 1989 .

[11]  G. Nicastro,et al.  Enhanced osmotolerance of a wheat mutant selected for potassium accumulation. , 2001, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[12]  R. T. Cruz,et al.  Leaf rolling and transpiration , 1979 .

[13]  N. Nikolaou,et al.  The role of organic solute and ion accumulation in osmotic adjustment in drought-stressed grapevines , 2002 .

[14]  H. Barrs,et al.  A Re-Examination of the Relative Turgidity Technique for Estimating Water Deficits in Leaves , 1962 .

[15]  S. Lutts,et al.  Water deficit effects on solute contribution to osmotic adjustment as a function of leaf ageing in three durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars performing differently in arid conditions. , 2001, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[16]  Karyudi,et al.  Osmoregulative capacity in birdseed millet under conditions of water stress. I. Variation in Setaria italica and Panicum miliaceum , 2004, Euphytica.

[17]  E. Galinski Compatible solutes of halophilic eubacteria: molecular principles, water-solute interaction, stress protection , 1993, Experientia.

[18]  P. Sudhakaran,et al.  Water stress-induced alterations in the proline metabolism of drought-susceptible and -tolerant cassava (Manihot esculenta) cultivars , 1995 .

[19]  V. Mahalakshmi,et al.  Water deficit during panicle development in pearl millet: yield compensation by tillers , 1986, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[20]  S. Lutts,et al.  Physiological changes after exposure to and recovery from polyethylene glycol-induced water deficit in roots and leaves of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars differing in drought resistance , 2000 .

[21]  B. Schobert,et al.  Unusual solution properties of proline and its interaction with proteins. , 1978, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[22]  R. Munns,et al.  Contribution of Sugars to Osmotic Adjustment in Elongating and Expanded Zones of Wheat Leaves During Moderate Water Deficits at Two Light Levels , 1981 .

[23]  J. Morgan,et al.  OSMOREGULATION AND WATER STRESS IN HIGHER PLANTS , 1984 .

[24]  D. Lösel,et al.  Contribution of Carbohydrates and other Solutes to Osmotic Adjustment in Wheat Leaves Under Water Stress , 1995 .

[25]  A. Lalusin,et al.  The maintenance of growth and turgor in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum [L.] Leeke) cultivars with different root structures and osmo-regulation under drought stress , 2005 .

[26]  H. Nguyen,et al.  Diversity for osmotic adjustment and root depth in TEF [Eragrostis tef (Zucc) Trotter] , 2004, Euphytica.

[27]  T. Winkel,et al.  Impact of late-season drought on water relations in a sparse canopy of millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) , 1996 .

[28]  G. Wright,et al.  Differences between Two Grain Sorghum Genotypes in Adaptation to Drought Stress. III* Physiological Responses , 1983 .

[29]  N. Smirnoff,et al.  Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of compatible solutes , 1989 .

[30]  A. Pradet,et al.  Asparagine metabolism and nitrogen distribution during protein degradation in sugar-starved maize root tips , 1992, Planta.

[31]  J. Ray,et al.  Variation in root penetration ability, osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance among accessions of rice adapted to rainfed lowland and upland ecosystems , 2001 .

[32]  Suo-min Wang,et al.  The characteristics of Na+, K+ and free proline distribution in several drought-resistant plants of the Alxa Desert, China , 2004 .

[33]  V. Mahalakshmi,et al.  Water stress and time of floral initiation in pearl millet , 1985, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[34]  N. Fonzo,et al.  The accumulation of solutes and water binding strength in durum wheat , 1994 .

[35]  Kazukiyo Yamamoto Estimation of the canopy-gap size using two photographs taken at different heights , 2000, Ecological Research.

[36]  M. Shao,et al.  Interaction of Osmotic Adjustment and Photosynthesis in Winter Wheat Under Soil Drought , 1999 .

[37]  I. D. Teare,et al.  Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies , 1973, Plant and Soil.

[38]  I. E. Hension,et al.  Evidence for panicle control of stomatal baheviour in water-stressed plants of pearl millet , 1985 .

[39]  R. Bligny,et al.  Transient accumulation of asparagine in sycamore cells after a long period of sucrose starvation. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[40]  S. Grattan,et al.  Rapid assay for determination of water soluble quaternary ammonium compounds , 1983, Plant and Soil.