Equivalent Wheel Load Approach for Slender Cable-Stayed Bridge Fatigue Assessment under Traffic and Wind: Feasibility Study

In the current AASHTO LRFD specifications, the fatigue design considers only one design truck per bridge with 15% dynamic allowance. While this empirical approach may be practical for regular short and medium span bridges, it may not be rational for long-span bridges (e.g., span length > 152.4 m or 500 ft) that may carry many heavy trucks simultaneously. Some existent studies suggested that fatigue may not control the design for many small and medium bridges. However, little research on the fatigue performance of long-span bridges subjected to both wind and traffic has been reported and if fatigue could become a dominant issue for such a long-span bridge design is still not clear. Regardless if the current fatigue design specifications are sufficient or not, a real understanding of the traffic effects on bridge performance including fatigue is desirable since the one truck per bridge for fatigue design does not represent the actual traffic condition. As the first step toward the study of fatigue performance of long-span cable-stayed bridges under both busy traffic and wind, the equivalent dynamic wheel load approach is proposed in the current study to simplify the analysis procedure. Based on full interaction analyses of a single-vehicle – bridge – wind system, the dynamic wheel load of the vehicle acting on the bridge can be obtained for a given vehicle type, wind, and driving condition. As a result, the dimension of the coupled equations is independent of the number of vehicles, through which the analyses can be significantly simplified. Such simplification is the key step toward the future fatigue analysis of long-span bridges under a combined action of wind and actual traffic conditions.

[1]  Dongzhou Huang,et al.  Dynamic and Impact Behavior of Half-Through Arch Bridges , 2005 .

[2]  Raimundo Delgado,et al.  Analysis of Traffic-Induced Vibrations in a Cable-Stayed Bridge. Part II: Numerical Modeling and Stochastic Simulation , 2005 .

[3]  Suren Chen,et al.  Unified approach to predict the dynamic performance of transportation system considering wind effects , 2006 .

[4]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  COUPLED FLUTTER AND BUFFETING ANALYSIS OF LONG-SPAN BRIDGES , 1996 .

[5]  T. E. Blejwas,et al.  Dynamic interaction of moving vehicles and structures , 1979 .

[6]  Stephen P. Timoshenko,et al.  Vibration problems in engineering , 1928 .

[7]  Suren Chen,et al.  Accident assessment of vehicles on long-span bridges in windy environments , 2004 .

[8]  Suren Chen,et al.  Dynamic performance of bridges and vehicles under strong wind , 2004 .

[9]  Yl L. Xu,et al.  Fully Computerized Approach to Study Cable-Stayed BRIDGE-VEHICLE Interaction , 2001 .

[10]  Christopher Baker,et al.  High sided road vehicles in cross winds , 1990 .

[11]  Suren Chen,et al.  Framework of vehicle–bridge–wind dynamic analysis , 2004 .

[12]  T. K. Datta,et al.  Reliability Analysis of Suspension Bridges against Fatigue Failure from the Gusting of Wind , 2005 .

[13]  Ming Gu,et al.  Fatigue life estimation of steel girder of Yangpu cable-stayed Bridge due to buffeting , 1999 .

[14]  Musharraf Zaman,et al.  Dynamic response of cable-stayed bridges to moving vehicles using the structural impedance method , 1996 .

[15]  Ton-Lo Wang,et al.  Vibration of Thin-Walled Box-Girder Bridges Excited by Vehicles , 1995 .

[16]  Suren Chen,et al.  Wind vibration mitigation of long-span bridges in hurricanes , 2004 .