The effect of model spatial resolution on Secondary Organic Aerosol predictions: a case study at Whistler, BC, Canada

Abstract. A large fraction of submicron aerosol mass throughout the continental boundary layer consists of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) mass. As such, the ability of chemical transport models to accurately predict continental boundary layer aerosol greatly depends on their ability to predict SOA. Although there has been much recent effort to better describe SOA formation mechanisms in models, little attention has been paid to the effects of model spatial resolution on SOA predictions. The Whistler Aerosol and Cloud Study (WACS 2010), held between 22 June and 28 July 2010 and conducted at Whistler, BC, Canada provides a unique data set for testing simulated SOA predictions. The study consisted of intensive measurements of atmospheric trace gases and particles at several locations strongly influenced by biogenic sources in the region. We test the ability of the global chemical transport model GEOS-Chem to predict the aerosol concentrations during this event and throughout the campaign. Simulations were performed using three different resolutions of the model: 4° × 5° , 2° × 2.5° and 0.5° × 0.667°. Predictions of organic aerosol concentrations at Whistler were greatly dependent on the resolution; the 4° × 5° version of the model significantly under predicts organic aerosol, while the 2° × 2.5° and 0.5° × 0.667° versions are much more closely correlated with measurements. In addition, we performed a comparison between the 3 versions of the model across North America. Comparison simulations were run for both a summer case (July) and Winter case (January). For the summer case, 0.5° × 0.667° simulations predicted on average 19% more SOA than 2° × 2.5° and 32% more than 4° × 5° . For the winter case, the 0.5° × 0.667° simulations predicted 8% more SOA than the 2° × 2.5° and 23% more than the 4° × 5°. This increase in SOA with resolution is largely due to sub-grid variability of organic aerosol (OA) that leads to an increase in the partitioning of secondary organic matter to the aerosol phase at higher resolutions. SOA concentrations were further increased because the shift of secondary organic gases to SOA at higher resolutions increased the lifetime of secondary organic matter (secondary organic gases have a shorter deposition lifetime than SOA in the model). SOA precursor emissions also have smaller, but non-negligible, changes with resolution due to non-linear inputs to the MEGAN biogenic emissions scheme. These results suggest that a portion of the traditional under-prediction of SOA by global models may be due to the effects of coarse grid resolution.

[1]  K. Strawbridge,et al.  Nucleation and condensational growth to CCN sizes during a sustained pristine biogenic SOA event in a forested mountain valley , 2011 .

[2]  B. Albrecht Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[3]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  Global modeling of SOA formation from dicarbonyls, epoxides, organic nitrates and peroxides , 2012 .

[4]  A. Virtanen,et al.  A method to resolve the phase state of aerosol particles , 2012 .

[5]  Allen L Robinson,et al.  Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging , 2007, Science.

[6]  Kelly Chance,et al.  Can a "state of the art" chemistry transport model simulate Amazonian tropospheric chemistry? , 2011 .

[7]  D. Fahey,et al.  Scales of variability of black carbon plumes over the Pacific Ocean , 2012 .

[8]  Shao-Meng Li,et al.  Temperature response of the submicron organic aerosol from temperate forests , 2011 .

[9]  D. R. Worsnop,et al.  Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere , 2009, Science.

[10]  Ulrich Pöschl,et al.  Gas uptake and chemical aging of semisolid organic aerosol particles , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Brauer,et al.  Global Estimates of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth: Development and Application , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Known and Unexplored Organic Constituents in the Earth's Atmosphere , 2007 .

[13]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Quantitative Estimates of the Volatility of Oa Quantitative Estimates of the Volatility of Ambient Organic Aerosol Acpd Quantitative Estimates of the Volatility of Oa Acpd Quantitative Estimates of the Volatility of Oa , 2022 .

[14]  P. Adams,et al.  Uncertainty in global CCN concentrations from uncertain aerosol nucleation and primary emission rates , 2008 .

[15]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Organic condensation: a vital link connecting aerosol formation to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations , 2011 .

[16]  Annmarie G. Carlton,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol yields from cloud‐processing of isoprene oxidation products , 2008 .

[17]  Golam Sarwar,et al.  Model representation of secondary organic aerosol in CMAQv4.7. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  G. Mann,et al.  Aerosol mass spectrometer constraint on the global secondary organic aerosol budget , 2011 .

[19]  Paul A. Makar,et al.  Impact of model grid spacing on regional- and urban- scale air quality predictions of organic aerosol , 2010 .

[20]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[21]  David G. Streets,et al.  Analysis of aircraft and satellite measurements from the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX-B) to quantify long-range transport of East Asian sulfur to Canada , 2008 .

[22]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Global secondary organic aerosol from isoprene oxidation , 2006 .

[23]  Spyros N. Pandis,et al.  Simulating secondary organic aerosol formation using the volatility basis-set approach in a chemical transport model , 2008 .

[24]  P. Palmer,et al.  Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature) , 2006 .

[25]  Erik Swietlicki,et al.  Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review , 2004 .

[26]  M. Molina,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher than expected , 2006 .

[27]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Global distribution and climate forcing of carbonaceous aerosols , 2002 .

[28]  J. Pankow An absorption model of GAS/Particle partitioning of organic compounds in the atmosphere , 1994 .

[29]  Christian Seigneur,et al.  Formation of secondary aerosols over Europe: comparison of two gas-phase chemical mechanisms , 2011 .

[30]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Global modeling of secondary organic aerosol formation from aromatic hydrocarbons: high- vs. low-yield pathways , 2007 .

[31]  J. H. Seinfeld,et al.  The Atmospheric Aerosol-Forming Potential of Whole Gasoline Vapor , 1997, Science.

[32]  A. Zelenyuk,et al.  Evaporation kinetics and phase of laboratory and ambient secondary organic aerosol , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Sonia M. Kreidenweis,et al.  Cloud droplet activation of secondary organic aerosol , 2007 .

[34]  S. Twomey Pollution and the Planetary Albedo , 1974 .

[35]  S. Martin,et al.  Particle mass yield in secondary organic aerosol formed by the dark ozonolysis of α-pinene , 2007 .

[36]  Barry J. Huebert,et al.  A large organic aerosol source in the free troposphere missing from current models , 2005 .

[37]  Jenny L. Hand,et al.  Seasonal composition of remote and urban fine particulate matter in the United States , 2012 .

[38]  M. Petters,et al.  A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity , 2006 .

[39]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Interactive comment on “ Quantification of the volatility of secondary organic compounds in ultrafine particles during nucleation events ” by J , 2011 .

[40]  R. Kamens,et al.  Heterogeneous Atmospheric Aerosol Production by Acid-Catalyzed Particle-Phase Reactions , 2002, Science.

[41]  D. Murphy,et al.  Formation and growth of organic aerosols downwind of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill , 2011 .