EMG-Driven Optimal Estimation of Subject-SPECIFIC Hill Model Muscle–Tendon Parameters of the Knee Joint Actuators

Objective: the purpose of this paper is to propose an optimal control problem formulation to estimate subject-specific Hill model muscle–tendon (MT-) parameters of the knee joint actuators by optimizing the fit between experimental and model-based knee moments. Additionally, this paper aims at determining which sets of functional motions contain the necessary information to identify the MT-parameters. Methods: the optimal control and parameter estimation problem underlying the MT-parameter estimation is solved for subject-specific MT-parameters via direct collocation using an electromyography-driven musculoskeletal model. The sets of motions containing sufficient information to identify the MT-parameters are determined by evaluating knee moments simulated based on subject-specific MT-parameters against experimental moments. Results: the MT-parameter estimation problem was solved in about 30 CPU minutes. MT-parameters could be identified from only seven of the 62 investigated sets of motions, underlining the importance of the experimental protocol. Using subject-specific MT-parameters instead of more common linearly scaled MT-parameters improved the fit between inverse dynamics moments and simulated moments by about 30% in terms of the coefficient of determination (from <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{0.57} \pm \text{0.20}$</tex-math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{0.74} \pm \text{0.14}$</tex-math></inline-formula>) and by about 26% in terms of the root mean square error (from <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{15.98} \pm \text{6.85}$</tex-math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\text{11.85} \pm \text{4.12}\,{\text{N}} \cdot {\text{m}}$</tex-math> </inline-formula>). In particular, subject-specific MT-parameters of the knee flexors were very different from linearly scaled MT-parameters. Conclusion: we introduced a computationally efficient optimal control problem formulation and provided guidelines for designing an experimental protocol to estimate subject-specific MT-parameters improving the accuracy of motion simulations. Significance: the proposed formulation opens new perspectives for subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling, which might be beneficial for simulating and understanding pathological motions.

[1]  H. Hatze,et al.  Estimation of myodynamic parameter values from observations on isometrically contracting muscle groups , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[2]  B. Martin PARAMETER ESTIMATION , 2012, Statistical Methods for Biomedical Research.

[3]  Michael A Sherman,et al.  WHAT IS A MOMENT ARM? CALCULATING MUSCLE EFFECTIVENESS IN BIOMECHANICAL MODELS USING GENERALIZED COORDINATES. , 2013, Proceedings of the ... ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences.

[4]  D. Thelen Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  M. Pandy,et al.  Sensitivity of model predictions of muscle function to changes in moment arms and muscle-tendon properties: a Monte-Carlo analysis. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  D. Winter,et al.  Predicting muscle forces in gait from EMG signals and musculotendon kinematics. , 1992, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[7]  Anil V. Rao,et al.  GPOPS-II , 2014, ACM Trans. Math. Softw..

[8]  M. Pandy,et al.  Dynamic optimization of human walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  David G Lloyd,et al.  Neuromusculoskeletal modeling: estimation of muscle forces and joint moments and movements from measurements of neural command. , 2004, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[10]  C. Scovil,et al.  Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Mark A. King,et al.  Determining Subject-Specific Torque Parameters for Use in a Torque-Driven Simulation Model of Dynamic Jumping , 2002 .

[12]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  R. Brand,et al.  The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Brian A. Garner,et al.  Estimation of Musculotendon Properties in the Human Upper Limb , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  F. Zajac,et al.  Force- and moment-generating capacity of lower-extremity muscles before and after tendon lengthening. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  James M. Wakeling,et al.  A Muscle’s Force Depends on the Recruitment Patterns of Its Fibers , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Ilse Jonkers,et al.  Subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling in patients before and after total hip arthroplasty* , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[18]  Yves Ballay,et al.  EMG activity and voluntary activation during knee-extensor concentric torque generation , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[19]  I Jonkers,et al.  Kalman smoothing improves the estimation of joint kinematics and kinetics in marker-based human gait analysis. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  H F J M Koopman,et al.  Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Scott L. Delp,et al.  A Model of the Lower Limb for Analysis of Human Movement , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  T. B. Kirk,et al.  Evaluation of different analytical methods for subject-specific scaling of musculotendon parameters. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Goele Pipeleers,et al.  A new method for estimating subject‐specific muscle–tendon parameters of the knee joint actuators: a simulation study , 2014, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[24]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[25]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , 2006, Math. Program..

[26]  I Jonkers,et al.  A physiology-based inverse dynamic analysis of human gait using sequential convex programming: a comparative study , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[27]  R. Brand,et al.  Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  B. Bigland-ritchie,et al.  Linear and non-linear surface EMG/force relationships in human muscles. An anatomical/functional argument for the existence of both. , 1983, American journal of physical medicine.

[29]  M. Schwartz,et al.  A new method for estimating joint parameters from motion data. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Dario Farina,et al.  EMG-Driven Forward-Dynamic Estimation of Muscle Force and Joint Moment about Multiple Degrees of Freedom in the Human Lower Extremity , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  Anil V. Rao,et al.  A Source Transformation via Operator Overloading Method for the Automatic Differentiation of Mathematical Functions in MATLAB , 2016, ACM Trans. Math. Softw..

[32]  Monica Reggiani,et al.  Estimation of musculotendon parameters for scaled and subject specific musculoskeletal models using an optimization technique. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  I Jonkers,et al.  Sensitivity of dynamic simulations of gait and dynamometer experiments to hill muscle model parameters of knee flexors and extensors. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  Marko Ackermann,et al.  Optimality principles for model-based prediction of human gait. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  D. Lloyd,et al.  An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  Dario Farina,et al.  Hybrid neuromusculoskeletal modeling to best track joint moments using a balance between muscle excitations derived from electromyograms and optimization. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  Jack M. Winters,et al.  An improved muscle-reflex actuator for use in large-scale neuromusculoskeletal models , 1995, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  Ian Stavness,et al.  A fast multi-obstacle muscle wrapping method using natural geodesic variations , 2016 .

[40]  Philip E. Martin,et al.  A Model of Human Muscle Energy Expenditure , 2003, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[41]  Marcus G Pandy,et al.  Sensitivity of muscle force estimates to variations in muscle-tendon properties. , 2007, Human movement science.

[42]  Anil V. Rao,et al.  Evaluation of Direct Collocation Optimal Control Problem Formulations for Solving the Muscle Redundancy Problem , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.