Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography

[1]  Wert und Bedeutung der digitalen Vollfeldmammographie im Rahmen eines Mammographie-Screenings , 2001, Der Radiologe.

[2]  J M Lewin,et al.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  S. Obenauer,et al.  Strahlenexposition bei der digitalen Vollfeldmammographie mit einem Flachdetektor aus amorphem Silizium im Vergleich zur konventionellen Film-Folien-Mammographie , 2000 .

[5]  E. Pisano,et al.  Current status of full-field digital mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[6]  S. Obenauer,et al.  [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography]. , 2000, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[7]  S Muller,et al.  Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[8]  B. Munier,et al.  Full field digital mammography scanner. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[9]  L. Björneld,et al.  Storage phosphor and film-screen mammography: performance with different mammographic techniques , 1999, European Radiology.

[10]  U. Fischer,et al.  MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? , 1998, Radiology.

[11]  Magnification survey and spot view mammography with a new microfocus X-ray unit: detail resolution and radiation exposure , 1998, European Radiology.

[12]  E. Sickles.  Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.