Probing the black hole metric: Black hole shadows and binary black-hole inspirals

In General Relativity, the spacetimes of black holes have three fundamental properties: (i) they are the same, to lowest order in spin, as the metrics of stellar objects; (ii) they are independent of mass, when expressed in geometric units; and (iii) they are described by the Kerr metric. In this paper, we quantify the upper bounds on potential black-hole metric deviations imposed by observations of black-hole shadows and of binary black-hole inspirals in order to explore the current experimental limits on possible violations of the last two predictions. We find that both types of experiments provide correlated constraints on deviation parameters that are primarily in the tt-components of the spacetimes, when expressed in areal coordinates. We conclude that, currently, there is no evidence for a deviations from the Kerr metric across the 8 orders of magnitudes in masses and 16 orders in curvatures spanned by the two types of black holes. Moreover, because of the particular masses of black holes in the current sample of gravitational-wave sources, the correlations imposed by the two experiments are aligned and of similar magnitudes when expressed in terms of the far field, post-Newtonian predictions of the metrics. If a future coalescing black-hole binary with two low-mass (e.g., ~3 Msun) components is discovered, the degeneracy between the deviation parameters can be broken by combining the inspiral constraints with those from the black-hole shadow measurements.

[1]  P. K. Panda,et al.  Open data from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , 2019, 1912.11716.

[2]  M. J. Williams,et al.  Bayesian inference for compact binary coalescences with bilby: validation and application to the first LIGO–Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalogue , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[3]  P. T. de Zeeuw,et al.  Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole , 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[4]  S. Nampalliwar,et al.  Gravitational-wave versus x-ray tests of strong-field gravity , 2019, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[5]  D. Psaltis,et al.  A Parametric Model for the Shapes of Black Hole Shadows in Non-Kerr Spacetimes , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[6]  Jessica R. Lu,et al.  Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic Center supermassive black hole , 2019, Science.

[7]  Chih-Wei L. Huang,et al.  First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole , 2019 .

[8]  S. T. Timmer,et al.  First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole , 2019, 1906.11238.

[9]  Daniel C. M. Palumbo,et al.  First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[10]  P. Ferreira Cosmological Tests of Gravity , 2019, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics.

[11]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs , 2018 .

[12]  P. Lasky,et al.  Bilby: A User-friendly Bayesian Inference Library for Gravitational-wave Astronomy , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[13]  H. Falcke,et al.  The current ability to test theories of gravity with black hole shadows , 2018, Nature Astronomy.

[14]  C. Burrage,et al.  Tests of chameleon gravity , 2017, Living Reviews in Relativity.

[15]  S. Giddings Gravitational wave tests of quantum modifications to black hole structure—with post-GW150914 update , 2016, 1602.03622.

[16]  N. Yunes,et al.  Extremal black holes in dynamical Chern–Simons gravity , 2015, 1512.05453.

[17]  A magnetized torus for modeling Sagittarius A∗ millimeter images and spectra , 2014, 1406.0353.

[18]  The Ligo Scientific Collaboration Advanced LIGO , 2014, 1411.4547.

[19]  Roy Williams,et al.  The LIGO Open Science Center , 2014, 1410.4839.

[20]  C. Broeck,et al.  Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , 2014, 1408.3978.

[21]  Mark Trodden,et al.  Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model , 2014, 1407.0059.

[22]  C. Will The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment , 1980, Living reviews in relativity.

[23]  L. Ho,et al.  Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies: Supplemental Material , 2013, 1304.7762.

[24]  Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al.  emcee: The MCMC Hammer , 2012, 1202.3665.

[25]  Alan E. E. Rogers,et al.  Jet-Launching Structure Resolved Near the Supermassive Black Hole in M87 , 2012, Science.

[26]  T. Paumard,et al.  Modelling the black hole silhouette in Sagittarius A* with ion tori , 2012, 1203.2618.

[27]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[28]  C. Will On the unreasonable effectiveness of the post-Newtonian approximation in gravitational physics , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Rohta Takahashi,et al.  Shapes and Positions of Black Hole Shadows in Accretion Disks and Spin Parameters of Black Holes , 2004, astro-ph/0405099.

[30]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[31]  Clifford M. Will,et al.  Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics: Frontmatter , 1993 .

[32]  B. Dewitt,et al.  Black holes (Les astres occlus) , 1973 .

[33]  K. Thorne,et al.  BLACK HOLES IN THE DICKE--BRANS--JORDAN THEORY OF GRAVITY. , 1971 .