Proportional mixture of two rarefaction/extrapolation curves to forecast biodiversity changes under landscape transformation.

Progressive habitat transformation causes global changes in landscape biodiversity patterns, but can be hard to quantify. Rarefaction/extrapolation approaches can quantify within-habitat biodiversity, but may not be useful for cases in which one habitat type is progressively transformed into another habitat type. To quantify biodiversity patterns in such transformed landscapes, we use Hill numbers to analyse individual-based species abundance data or replicated, sample-based incidence data. Given biodiversity data from two distinct habitat types, when a specified proportion of original habitat is transformed, our approach utilises a proportional mixture of two within-habitat rarefaction/extrapolation curves to analytically predict biodiversity changes, with bootstrap confidence intervals to assess sampling uncertainty. We also derive analytic formulas for assessing species composition (i.e. the numbers of shared and unique species) for any mixture of the two habitat types. Our analytical and numerical analyses revealed that species unique to each habitat type are the most important determinants of landscape biodiversity patterns.

[1]  W. Ripple,et al.  Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes , 2017, Nature.

[2]  D. Kulakowski,et al.  A walk on the wild side: Disturbance dynamics and the conservation and management of European mountain forest ecosystems. , 2017, Forest ecology and management.

[3]  J. Müller,et al.  Effects of natural disturbances and salvage logging on biodiversity – Lessons from the Bohemian Forest , 2017 .

[4]  J. Müller,et al.  Canopy closure determines arthropod assemblages in microhabitats created by windstorms and salvage logging , 2016 .

[5]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  A stochastic model for landscape patterns of biodiversity , 2016 .

[6]  A. Chao,et al.  Rarefaction and Extrapolation: Making Fair Comparison of Abundance‐Sensitive Phylogenetic Diversity among Multiple Assemblages , 2016, Systematic biology.

[7]  João V. Siqueira,et al.  Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation , 2016, Nature.

[8]  N. Gotelli,et al.  Unveiling the species-rank abundance distribution by generalizing the Good-Turing sample coverage theory. , 2015, Ecology.

[9]  Lawrence N. Hudson,et al.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity , 2015, Nature.

[10]  A. Magurran,et al.  Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the Anthropocene. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Z. Buřivalová,et al.  Thresholds of Logging Intensity to Maintain Tropical Forest Biodiversity , 2014, Current Biology.

[12]  P. Kareiva,et al.  REVIEW: The evolving linkage between conservation science and practice at The Nature Conservancy , 2014, The Journal of applied ecology.

[13]  A. Magurran,et al.  Assemblage Time Series Reveal Biodiversity Change but Not Systematic Loss , 2014, Science.

[14]  Elizabeth L. Sander,et al.  Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies , 2014 .

[15]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Gauging the impact of meta-analysis on ecology , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[16]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages , 2012 .

[17]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity , 2011, Nature.

[18]  Anne Chao,et al.  A novel statistical method for classifying habitat generalists and specialists. , 2011, Ecology.

[19]  R. Julliard,et al.  Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? , 2011 .

[20]  A. Chao,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity measures based on Hill numbers , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  D. Dent,et al.  The future of tropical species in secondary forests: A quantitative review , 2009 .

[22]  Martin Brändle,et al.  Do secondary forests act as refuges for old growth forest animals? Recovery of ant diversity in the Atlantic forest of Brazil , 2008 .

[23]  R. Naiman,et al.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[24]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[25]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[26]  K. Gaston Global patterns in biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[27]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Relative Effects of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on Population Extinction , 1997 .

[28]  M. Hill Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences , 1973 .

[29]  E. Borer,et al.  Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: Consequences for conservation and monitoring , 2018 .

[30]  A. Chao,et al.  Rarefaction and Extrapolation: Making Fair Comparison of Abundance-Sensitive Phylogenetic Diversity among Multiple Assemblages. , 2016, Systematic biology.