Protecting built property against fire disasters: Multi ‐attribute decision making with respect to fire risk

Abstract The protection of buildings against fire disasters may require a comparison of alternative fire safety designs. The fire safety solutions can be compared by means of a general methodology known as multi‐attribute selection or multi‐criteria decision making. The alternative fire designs can be described by a number of attributes which characterise each of the alternatives. Fire risk expressed in the general form used for the quantitative risk assessment is applied to compose the set of attributes of a multi‐attribute selection problem. It is shown how to accomplish the multi‐attribute selection in the presence of epistemic uncertainties in the elements of fire risk estimate. Epistemic probability distributions assigned to elements of fire risk are specified and propagated though models of the multi‐attribute selection by means of Monte Carlo simulation. An example presented in the paper considers the choice among alternative systems of automatic fire sprinklers.

[1]  John M. Watts,et al.  Fire Safety Code for Historic Structures , 2002 .

[2]  G. Ramachandran,et al.  The Economics of Fire Protection , 1998 .

[3]  Marilyn E. Kaplan,et al.  Fire Risk Index for Historic Buildings , 2001 .

[4]  Friedel Peldschus,et al.  The analysis of the quality of the results obtained with the methods of multi‐criteria decisions , 2009 .

[5]  Peide Liu,et al.  Multi‐attribute decision‐making method research based on interval vague set and TOPSIS method , 2009 .

[6]  Siuming Lo,et al.  A simulation approach for ranking of fire safety attributes of existing buildings , 2004 .

[7]  Edmundas K. Zavadskas,et al.  Multiattribute Selection from Alternative Designs of Infrastructure Components for Accidental Situations , 2009, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[8]  G. Apostolakis,et al.  Uncertain data and expert opinions in the assessment of the unavailability of suppression systems , 1988 .

[9]  Egidijus Rytas Vaidogas,et al.  ON APPLYING SPARSE AND UNCERTAIN INFORMATION TO ESTIMATING THE PROBABILITY OF FAILURE DUE TO RARE ABNORMAL SITUATIONS , 2009 .

[10]  Egidijus Rytas Vaidogas,et al.  Assessment of structures subjected to accidental actions using crisp and uncertain fragility functions , 2009 .

[11]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[12]  Hiromitsu Kumamoto,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Management for Engineers and Scientists , 1996 .

[13]  Egidijus Rytas Vaidogas,et al.  Sustainable development and major industrial accidents: The beneficial role of risk‐oriented structural engineering , 2008 .

[14]  Egidijus Rytas Vaidogas,et al.  Reliability of a timber structure exposed to fire: estimation using fragility function , 2008 .

[15]  B. Hoła.  Development tendency for accident situation in building industry , 2006 .

[16]  Jussi K. Vaurio,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of estimation methods for failure rates and probabilities , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  SELECTION OF THE EFFECTIVE DWELLING HOUSE WALLS BY APPLYING ATTRIBUTES VALUES DETERMINED AT INTERVALS , 2008 .

[18]  Krzysztof Schabowicz,et al.  Estimation of earthworks execution time cost by means of artificial neural networks , 2010 .

[19]  S. French.  Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality , 1986 .

[20]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Hayden Brown.  Economic Analysis of Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems. , 2005 .

[22]  Krzysztof Schabowicz,et al.  MATHEMATICAL-NEURAL MODEL FOR ASSESSING PRODUCTIVITY OF EARTHMOVING MACHINERY , 2007 .

[23]  David J Smith,et al.  Reliability, Maintainability and Risk: Practical Methods for Engineers , 1993 .

[24]  David Yung.  Principles of Fire Risk Assessment in Buildings: Yung/Principles of Fire Risk Assessment in Buildings , 2008 .

[25]  Hung-Chi Su,et al.  Influence of fire source locations on the actuation of wet-type sprinklers in an office fire , 2010 .

[26]  Bożena Hoła.  Methodology of hazards identification in construction work course , 2010 .

[27]  Evangelos,et al.  [Applied Optimization] Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study Volume 44 || A Computational Evaluation of the Original and the Revised AHP , 2000 .

[28]  Egidijus Rytas Vaidogas.  Risk Oriented Design of Protective Highway Structures , 2007 .

[29]  D. Rasbash.  Evaluation of Fire Safety , 2004 .

[30]  Bożena Hoła.  General model of accident rate growth in the construction industry , 2007 .

[31]  George Apostolakis,et al.  Fire risk in buildings: Frequency of exposure and physical model , 1991 .

[32]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Editorial: Optimization and intelligent decisions , 2009 .

[33]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Risk Analysis in Building Fire Safety Engineering , 2006 .

[34]  Ulrich Hauptmanns,et al.  Availability analysis for a fixed wet sprinkler system , 2008 .

[35]  Terje Aven,et al.  Foundations of risk analysis : a knowledge and decision-oriented perspective , 2003 .

[36]  Egidijus Rytas Vaidogas,et al.  Assessing external threats to structures using limited statistical data: An approach based on data resampling , 2007 .

[37]  B. Hoła.  Dynamics of the development of accident situation in construction industry with reference to building production value , 2009 .

[38]  T. Aven,et al.  Expressing and interpreting the results of quantitative risk analyses. Review and discussion , 1998 .

[39]  Bożena Hoła.  Methodology of estimation of accident situation in building industry , 2009 .

[40]  Egidijus Rytas Vaidogas.  First step towards preventing losses due to mechanical damage from abnormal actions : Knowledge-based forecasting the actions , 2006 .

[41]  Olavi Keski-Rahkonen,et al.  Reliability of sprinkler systems: Exploration and analysis of data from nuclear and non-nuclear installations , 2004 .

[42]  M. Law,et al.  Evaluation of Fire Safety: Rasbash/Evaluation of Fire Safety , 2006 .

[43]  David Yung.  Principles of Fire Risk Assessment in Buildings , 2009 .

[44]  Geoff Craighead,et al.  High Rise Security and Fire Life Safety , 1995 .

[45]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  The web–based real estate multiple criteria negotiation decision support system: A new generation of decision support systems , 2009 .

[46]  Chu Guanquan,et al.  Quantitative assessment of building fire risk to life safety. , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[47]  Olavi Keski-Rahkonen,et al.  On the reliability of fire detection and alarm systems Exploration and analysis of data from nuclear and non-nuclear installations , 2005 .

[48]  David T. Butry,et al.  Benefit-Cost Analysis of Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems | NIST , 2007 .