In situ accumulation of methane bubbles in a natural wetland soil

Summary Natural wetlands are a significant source of atmospheric methane, an important greenhouse gas. Compared with numerous papers on measurements of methane emission from natural wetland surfaces, there are few reports on methane configuration and distribution within wetland soil profiles. By using a newly designed gas sampler, we succeeded in collecting free-phase gas from beneath the water table down to 120 cm in a peat. The volumetric percentage ofmethane in the gas phase increased with depth and was generally more than 50% beneath the zone within which the water table fluctuates. The volume of the gas phase in the peat beneath the water table was estimated to be from 0 to 19% with significant variation with depth, suggesting uneven distribution ofgas bubbles. Using the volume ratio ofthe gas and liquid phases and methane concentration data in the gas phase, as well as assuming that methane was in equilibrium (based on Henry’s Law between the two phases), we calculated that *60% ofthe methane accumulates in the form of bubbles. These results suggest the importance of ebullition in methane emission, which might be a major cause for the reportedly large variation of methane emission in both space and time. Most importantly, our results show the need to consider gaseous-phase methane for understanding the production, transport and emission mechanisms ofmethane in wetlands, which has been overlooked to date.

[1]  O. Oenema,et al.  Methane production and carbon mineralisation of size and density fractions of peat soils , 1999 .

[2]  S. P. Mathur,et al.  A field study of the effect of depth on methane production in peatland waters: equipment and preliminary results , 1988 .

[3]  P. Martikainen,et al.  Factors controlling large scale variations in methane emissions from wetlands , 2003 .

[4]  Robert C. Harriss,et al.  Review and assessment of methane emissions from wetlands , 1993 .

[5]  D. I. Sebacher,et al.  Methane flux in the Great Dismal Swamp , 1982, Nature.

[6]  M. Beckmann,et al.  Mass spectrometric monitoring of gases (CO2, CH4, O2) in a mesotrophic peat core from Kopparås Mire, Sweden , 2001 .

[7]  J. Lerner,et al.  Three‐dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle , 1991 .

[8]  Inez Y. Fung,et al.  Methane emission from natural wetlands: Global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources , 1987 .

[9]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  An inverse modeling approach to investigate the global atmospheric methane cycle , 1997 .

[10]  N. Shurpali,et al.  Seasonal distribution of methane flux in a Minnesota peatland measured by eddy correlation , 1993 .

[11]  J. Chanton,et al.  Primary production control of methane emission from wetlands , 1993, Nature.

[12]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  Methane and carbon dioxide production in, transport through, and efflux from a peatland , 1995, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  S. P. Mathur,et al.  EFFECT OF IN‐SITU GAS ACCUMULATION ON THE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF PEAT , 1992 .

[14]  Andrew Baird,et al.  Effect of biogenic gas bubbles on water flow through poorly decomposed blanket peat , 2001 .

[15]  Donald I. Siegel,et al.  Use of hydraulic head to estimate volumetric gas content and ebullition flux in northern peatlands , 2003 .

[16]  T. Moore,et al.  Experimental response of peatland carbon dynamics to a water table fluctuation , 2003, Aquatic Sciences.

[17]  S. P. Mathur,et al.  An ombrotrophic bog as a methane reservoir , 1989 .

[18]  H. Hemond,et al.  Trapped methane volume and potential effects on methane ebullition in a northern peatland , 1996 .