Shading and texture: separate information channels with a common adaptation mechanism?

We outline a scheme for the way in which early vision may handle information about shading (luminance modulation, LM) and texture (contrast modulation, CM). Previous work on the detection of gratings has found no sub-threshold summation, and no cross-adaptation, between LM and CM patterns. This strongly implied separate channels for the detection of LM and CM structure. However, we now report experiments in which adapting to LM (or CM) gratings creates tilt aftereffects of similar magnitude on both LM and CM test gratings, and reduces the perceived strength (modulation depth) of LM and CM gratings to a similar extent. This transfer of aftereffects between LM and CM might suggest a second stage of processing at which LM and CM information is integrated. The nature of this integration, however, is unclear and several simple predictions are not fulfilled. Firstly, one might expect the integration stage to lose identity information about whether the pattern was LM or CM. We show instead that the identity of barely detectable LM and CM patterns is not lost. Secondly, when LM and CM gratings are combined in-phase or out-of-phase we find no evidence for cancellation, nor for 'phase-blindness'. These results suggest that information about LM and CM is not pooled or merged--shading is not confused with texture variation. We suggest that LM and CM signals are carried by separate channels, but they share a common adaptation mechanism that accounts for the almost complete transfer of perceptual aftereffects.

[1]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[2]  D. M. Parker.  Contrast and Size Variables and the Tilt After-effect , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Stimulus specificity in the human visual system. , 1973, Vision research.

[4]  ANDREW SMITH,et al.  Tilt aftereffects with subjective contours , 1975, Nature.

[5]  J. Robson,et al.  Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[6]  M A Georgeson,et al.  The effect of spatial adaptation on perceived contrast. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[7]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[9]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Subjective contours, tilt aftereffects, and visual cortical organization , 1989, Vision Research.

[10]  R. Snowden.  Measurement of visual channels by contrast adaptation , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Robert J. Snowden,et al.  Subtractive and divisive adaptation in the human visual system , 1992, Nature.

[12]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[13]  C L Baker,et al.  A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses. , 1993, Science.

[14]  Guy Orban,et al.  Illusory, motion, and luminance-defined contours interact in the human visual system , 1994, Vision Research.

[15]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Visual detection of motion , 1994 .

[16]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision , 1994, Vision Research.

[17]  G. Sperling,et al.  Full-wave and half-wave rectification in second-order motion perception , 1994, Vision Research.

[18]  J A Solomon,et al.  Full-wave and half-wave processes in second-order motion and texture. , 1994, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[19]  G. Sperling,et al.  The functional architecture of human visual motion perception , 1995, Vision Research.

[20]  S. Nishida,et al.  Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing , 1995, Vision Research.

[21]  J. Ross,et al.  Perceived contrast following adaptation to gratings of different orientations , 1996, Vision Research.

[22]  R. Snowden,et al.  Spatial frequency adaptation: Threshold elevation and perceived contrast , 1996, Vision Research.

[23]  C L Baker,et al.  Spatial properties of envelope-responsive cells in area 17 and 18 neurons of the cat. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual System , 1997, Vision Research.

[25]  Keith Langley,et al.  Stereopsis from contrast envelopes , 1999, Vision Research.

[26]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Sensitivity to modulations of luminance and contrast in visual white noise: separate mechanisms with similar behaviour , 1999, Vision Research.

[27]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Does early non-linearity account for second-order motion? , 1999, Vision Research.

[28]  Dave Regan,et al.  Human perception of objects: early visual processing of spatial form defined by luminance , 2000 .

[29]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Visual perception : physiology, psychology, & ecology , 2003 .

[30]  V. Bruce,et al.  Visual perception: physiology, psychology and ecology. Fourth edition , 2003 .

[31]  J. Gibson,et al.  ADAPTATION , AFTEREFFECT AND CONTRAST IN THE PERCEPTION OF TILTED LINES , 2004 .