People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times.

Task completion plans normally resemble best-case scenarios and yield overly optimistic predictions of completion times. The authors induced participants to generate more pessimistic scenarios and examined completion predictions. Participants described a pessimistic scenario of task completion either alone or with an optimistic scenario. Pessimistic scenarios did not affect predictions or accuracy and were consistently rated less plausible than optimistic scenarios (Experiments 1-3). Experiment 4 independently manipulated scenario plausibility and optimism. Plausibility moderated the impact of optimistic, but not pessimistic, scenarios. Experiment 5 supported a motivational explanation of the tendency to disregard pessimistic scenarios regardless of their plausibility. People took pessimistic scenarios into account when predicting someone else's completion times. The authors conclude that pessimistic-scenario generation may not be an effective debiasing technique for personal predictions.

[1]  Kristine M. Kuhn,et al.  Confidence and Uncertainty in Judgmental Forecasting: Differential Effects of Scenario Presentation , 1996 .

[2]  Rick P. Thomas,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes the Role of Mental Simulation in Judgments of Likelihood One Aspect of Simulation That Has Received Relatively , 2022 .

[3]  R. Buehler,et al.  The Role of Motivated Reasoning in Optimistic Time Predictions , 1997 .

[4]  L. Ross,et al.  The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Lyle Brenner,et al.  On the evaluation of one‐sided evidence , 1996 .

[6]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  Thinking about the future: A cognitive perspective , 1993 .

[7]  P. Schoemaker.  MULTIPLE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT: ITS CONCEPTUAL AND BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATION , 1993 .

[8]  Derek J. Koehler,et al.  Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events. , 1985 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  The simulation heuristic , 1982 .

[11]  Pierre Wack,et al.  Scenarios : Uncharted Waters Ahead , 1996 .

[12]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[13]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[14]  N. Sanders,et al.  Journal of behavioral decision making: "The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting", 5 (1992) 39-52 , 1992 .

[15]  J. Carroll.  The Effect of Imagining an Event on Expectations for the Event: An Interpretation in Terms of the Availability Heuristic. , 1978 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[17]  S. Byram,et al.  Cognitive and motivational factors influencing time prediction. , 1997 .

[18]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Knowing what you'll do: effects of analyzing reasons on self-prediction. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Forecasting with scenarios , 1993 .

[20]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[21]  R. Buehler,et al.  Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times. , 1994 .

[22]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Situated Optimism: Specific Outcome Expectancies and Self-Regulation , 1998 .

[23]  D. M. Georgoff,et al.  Harvard Business Review: David M. Georgoff and Robert G. Murdick, manager's guide to forecasting, 64 (Jan-Feb.) (1986) 110-120 , 1988 .

[24]  Steven P. Schnaars,et al.  The use of multiple scenarios in sales forecasting: An empirical test , 1987 .

[25]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.