Dissipative devices for earthquake resistant composite steel structures: bolted versus welded solution

This paper investigates and compares the seismic performance of two types of innovative repairable fuse devices for earthquake resistant composite steel frames through experimental tests and numerical analyses. The fuses are energy dissipating devices consisting of steel plates that can be welded or bolted to the beam web and bottom flange. The numerical analyses performed in this study are based on the results of experimental tests carried out on beam-to-column sub-assemblages equipped with both the types of fuse devices. The main differences in terms of hysteretic behavior and failure modes of the fuses are identified through the experimental campaign. Detailed three-dimensional finite element models of the beam-to-column sub-assemblages are then created to provide a deeper insight into both the response and the effectiveness of the two investigated devices. On the basis of the results of both the experimental tests and numerical analyses, simplified models of different types of fuses are developed in order to study the effects of bolted and welded devices on the seismic response of composite steel frames. The results are then extended to the case of three-dimensional building structures with different number of storeys. The experimental and numerical investigations prove the effectiveness of the fuses and highlight the main differences between the two possible solutions.

[1]  Carlo Andrea Castiglioni,et al.  Behavior of exterior partial-strength composite beam-to-column connections: Experimental study and numerical simulations , 2009 .

[2]  Ioannis Vayas,et al.  Seismic behavior of frames with innovative energy dissipation systems (FUSEIS 1-1) , 2014 .

[3]  Chanakya Arya,et al.  Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures , 2018, Design of Structural Elements.

[4]  Carlo Andrea Castiglioni,et al.  Dynamic response of composite frames with different shear connection degree , 2009 .

[5]  Michael Pollino,et al.  Braced Ductile Shear Panel: New Seismic-Resistant Framing System , 2014 .

[6]  M.Y.H. Bangash,et al.  Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Structures , 2010 .

[7]  Ioannis Vayas,et al.  Seismic behavior of frames with innovative energy dissipation systems (FUSEIS1-2) , 2015 .

[8]  Carlo Andrea Castiglioni,et al.  Hysteretic behaviour of dissipative bolted fuses for earthquake resistant steel frames , 2013 .

[9]  Nabil Mansour,et al.  Seismic Design and Performance of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames with Nonlinear Replaceable Links , 2011 .

[10]  Nabil Mansour,et al.  Experimental Validation of Replaceable Shear Links for Eccentrically Braced Steel Frames , 2011 .

[11]  Ahmed Y. Elghazouli,et al.  Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures , 2010 .

[12]  Wei Chen,et al.  Thermal and Mechanical Modeling of Load-Bearing Cold-Formed Steel Wall Systems in Fire , 2014 .

[13]  Luis Calado,et al.  Experimental analysis of seismic resistant composite steel frames with dissipative devices , 2012 .

[14]  L. Calado,et al.  Hysteretic behavior of dissipative welded fuses for earthquake resistant composite steel and concrete frames , 2013 .

[15]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the- practice , 2002 .