Joint geophysical, petrophysical and geologic inversion using a dynamic Gaussian mixture model

We present a framework for petrophysically and geologically guided inversion to perform multi-physics joint inversions. Petrophysical and geological information is included in a multi-dimensional Gaussian mixture model that regularizes the inverse problem. The inverse problem we construct consists of a suite of three cyclic optimizations over the geophysical, petrophysical and geological information. The two additional problems over the petrophysical and geological data are used as a coupling term. They correspond to updating the geophysical reference model and regularization weights. This guides the inverse problem towards reproducing the desired petrophysical and geological characteristics. The objective function that we define for the inverse problem is comprised of multiple data misfit terms: one for each geophysical survey and one for the petrophysical properties and geological information. Each of these misfit terms has its target misfit value which we seek to fit in the inversion. We detail our reweighting strategies to handle multiple data misfits at once. Our framework is modular and extensible, and this allows us to combine multiple geophysical methods in a joint inversion and to distribute open-source code and reproducible examples. To illustrate the gains made by multi-physics inversions, we apply our framework to jointly invert, in 3D, synthetic potential fields data based on the DO-$27$ kimberlite pipe case study (Northwest Territories, Canada). The pipe contains two distinct kimberlite facies embedded in a host rock. We show that inverting the datasets individually, even with petrophysical information, leads to a binary geologic model consisting of background or kimberlite. A joint inversion, with petrophysical information, can differentiate the two main kimberlite facies of the pipe.

[1]  Jiajia Sun,et al.  Geophysical inversions applied to 3D geology characterization of an iron oxide copper-gold deposit in Brazil , 2017 .

[2]  S. Greenhalgh,et al.  Zonation for 3D aquifer characterization based on joint inversions of multimethod crosshole geophysical data , 2010 .

[3]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Inversion of airborne geophysics over the DO-27/DO-18 kimberlites — Part 3: Induced polarization , 2017 .

[4]  M. Zhdanov,et al.  3‐D magnetic inversion with data compression and image focusing , 2002 .

[5]  M. Meju,et al.  Characterization of heterogeneous near‐surface materials by joint 2D inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data , 2003 .

[6]  Ernesto Della Rossa,et al.  Probabilistic petrophysical-properties estimation integrating statistical rock physics with seismic inversion , 2010 .

[7]  D. Grana,et al.  Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Linear Inversion for Geophysical Inverse Problems , 2017, Mathematical Geosciences.

[8]  Michele De Stefano,et al.  Multiple-domain, simultaneous joint inversion of geophysical data with application to subsalt imaging , 2011 .

[9]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  3-D inversion of magnetic data , 1996 .

[10]  Afnimar,et al.  Joint inversion of refraction and gravity data for the three-dimensional topography of a sediment–basement interface , 2002 .

[11]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[12]  H. Mikada,et al.  A method for simultaneous velocity and density inversion and its application to exploration of subsurface structure beneath Izu-Oshima volcano, Japan , 2002 .

[13]  Magnetization clustering inversion — Part 1: Building an automated numerical optimization algorithm , 2018, GEOPHYSICS.

[14]  Jens Tronicke,et al.  Cooperative inversion of 2D geophysical data sets: A zonal approach based on fuzzy c-means cluster analysis , 2007 .

[15]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  INVERSION FOR APPLIED GEOPHYSICS: A TUTORIAL , 2003 .

[16]  R. Parker Understanding Inverse Theory , 1977 .

[17]  Lindsey J. Heagy,et al.  A framework for simulation and inversion in electromagnetics , 2016, Comput. Geosci..

[18]  Jiajia Sun,et al.  Joint inversion of multiple geophysical and petrophysical data using generalized fuzzy clustering algorithms , 2017 .

[19]  P. Sailhac,et al.  Use of the analytic signal to identify magnetic anomalies due to kimberlite pipes , 2004 .

[20]  Uri M. Ascher,et al.  A First Course in Numerical Methods , 2011 .

[21]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  METHODS FOR CALCULATING FRÉCHET DERIVATIVES AND SENSITIVITIES FOR THE NON‐LINEAR INVERSE PROBLEM: A COMPARATIVE STUDY1 , 1990 .

[22]  J. Macnae Applications of geophysics for the detection and exploration of kimberlites and lamproites , 1995 .

[23]  E. Haber,et al.  Joint inversion: a structural approach , 1997 .

[24]  Max A. Meju,et al.  Structure‐coupled multiphysics imaging in geophysical sciences , 2011 .

[25]  Uri M. Ascher,et al.  A First Course in Numerical Methods , 2011 .

[26]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Joint inversion of potential-fields data over the DO-27 kimberlite pipe using a Gaussian mixture model prior , 2020 .

[27]  M. Meju,et al.  Joint two-dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross-gradients constraints , 2004 .

[28]  Yaoguo Li,et al.  Multidomain petrophysically constrained inversion and geology differentiation using guided fuzzy c-means clustering , 2015 .

[29]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  3-D inversion of magnetic data , 1996 .

[30]  M. Zhdanov,et al.  Weighted Regularized Inversion of Magnetotelluric Data , 1998 .

[31]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Moving between dimensions in electromagnetic inversions , 2015 .

[32]  Lindsey J. Heagy,et al.  SimPEG: An open source framework for simulation and gradient based parameter estimation in geophysical applications , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[33]  C. Farquharson,et al.  Joint inversion of seismic traveltimes and gravity data on unstructured grids with application to mineral exploration , 2010 .

[34]  Jiajia Sun,et al.  Joint inversion of multiple geophysical data using guided fuzzy c-means clustering , 2016 .

[35]  Alan D. Chave,et al.  Joint inversion of marine magnetotelluric and gravity data incorporating seismic constraints , 2009 .

[36]  M. Argáez,et al.  Constrained optimization framework for joint inversion of geophysical data sets , 2013 .

[37]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[38]  Ken Witherly,et al.  The Tli Kwi Cho kimberlite complex, Northwest Territories, Canada: A geophysical case study , 2004 .

[39]  Michel Chouteau,et al.  3D stochastic joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data , 2012 .

[40]  Sarah G. R. Devriese,et al.  Inversion of airborne geophysics over the DO-27/DO-18 kimberlites — Part 1: Potential fields , 2017 .

[41]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  3D electromagnetic modelling and inversion: a case for open source , 2019, Exploration Geophysics.

[42]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Inversion of geophysical data over a copper gold porphyry deposit; a case history for Mt. Milligan , 1997 .

[43]  Jiajia Sun,et al.  Geology differentiation: A new frontier in quantitative geophysical interpretation in mineral exploration , 2019, The Leading Edge.

[44]  J. Legault,et al.  A new approach for kimberlite exploration using helicopter-borne TDEM data , 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018.

[45]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  3-D inversion of gravity data , 1998 .

[46]  Yushan Yang,et al.  JOINT INVERSION OF SEISMIC TRAVELTIMES AND GRAVITY DATA ON THE MICANG FORELAND FOLD BELT AND ITS HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL , 2014 .

[47]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  A framework for petrophysically and geologically guided geophysical inversion using a dynamic Gaussian mixture model prior , 2019, Geophysical Journal International.