Evaluation of Effective Parameters on EGR/Blowby Distribution

Increase of environmental pollution and restricted emission legislations have forced companies to produce automobiles with lower air pollutants. In this respect, discharge of blowby gases into the environment has been prohibited and their recirculation into the combustion chamber is proposed as an alternative solution. In addition, using EGR technique to control and reduce nitrogen oxides in internal combustion engines has been quite effective. An important common feature of these two methods is the fact that improper EGR/blowby distribution leads to the increase in other pollutants and the significant engine power reduction. Therefore, the study of important factors in maldistribution of the injected gases is of great practical importance. Besides the injection position that has significant role on distribution of injected gases, it seems that other parameters such as engine speed, injection velocity and angle may affect the distribution of injected gases. In this numerical study, a new technique is used to determine the effect of these parameters on distribution of injected EGR or blowby gases into the EF7 intake manifold. Numerical calculations are performed for three injection velocities, five injection angles and three different engine speeds. It was found that recirculated gases distribution is slightly influenced by the injection angle and injection velocity, while the engine speed is the most influential factor.

[1]  H. Niazmand,et al.  Particle Tracking Based Method for Evaluation of Cylinder‐to‐Cylinder Distribution of EGR/Blowby , 2012 .

[2]  V. Ganesan,et al.  Investigation of the flow field in the various regions of intake manifold of a S.I. engine , 2004 .

[3]  Zlatina Dimitrova,et al.  Synergies between High EGR Operation and GDI Systems , 2008 .

[4]  N. Henein,et al.  Transient Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in the EGR Cooler , 2008 .

[5]  Arnaud Torres,et al.  Modeling the Effects of EGR Inhomogeneities Induced by Intake Systems in a Four-Valve Engine , 1996 .

[6]  Roger B. Krieger,et al.  Modifying an Intake Manifold to Improve Cylinder-to-Cylinder EGR Distribution in a DI Diesel Engine Using Combined CFD and Engine Experiments , 2001 .

[7]  G. C. Mavropoulos,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of EGR, Intake Water Injection and Fuel/Water Emulsion as NOx Reduction Techniques for Heavy Duty Diesel Engines , 2007 .

[8]  R. Reese,et al.  Effect of Intake Primary Runner Blockages on Combustion Characteristics and Emissions with Stoichiometric and EGR-diluted Mixtures in SI Engines , 2007 .

[9]  Federico Millo,et al.  An experimental and numerical study of an advanced EGR control system for automotive diesel engine , 2008 .

[10]  George G. Muntean,et al.  Resolving EGR Distribution and Mixing , 2002 .

[11]  Ephraim M Sparrow,et al.  Turbulence modeling for flow in a distribution manifold , 2009 .

[12]  Johann William,et al.  Study of Geometrical Parameter Influence on Air/EGR Mixing , 2003 .

[13]  R. M. Green,et al.  Measuring the Cylinder-to-Cylinder EGR Distribution in the Intake of a Diesel Engine During Transient Operation , 2000 .