Emissions and risks associated with oxyfuel combustion: State of the science and critical data gaps

Oxyfuel combustion is a promising technology that may greatly facilitate carbon capture and sequestration by increasing the relative CO2 content of the combustion emission stream. However, the potential effect of enhanced oxygen combustion conditions on emissions of criteria and hazardous air pollutants (e.g., acid gases, particulates, metals and organics) is not well studied. It is possible that combustion under oxyfuel conditions could produce emissions posing different risks than those currently being managed by the power industry (e.g., by changing the valence state of metals). The data available for addressing these concerns are quite limited and are typically derived from laboratory-scale or pilot-scale tests. A review of the available data does suggest that oxyfuel combustion may decrease the air emissions of some pollutants (e.g., SO2, NOx, particulates) whereas data for other pollutants are too limited to draw any conclusions. The oxy-combustion systems that have been proposed to date do not have a conventional “stack” and combustion flue gas is treated in such a way that solid or liquid waste streams are the major outputs. Use of this technology will therefore shift emissions from air to solid or liquid waste streams, but the risk management implications of this potential change have yet to be assessed. Truly useful studies of the potential effects of oxyfuel combustion on power plant emissions will require construction of integrated systems containing a combustion system coupled to a CO2 processing unit. Sampling and analysis to assess potential emission effects should be an essential part of integrated system tests. Implications: Oxyfuel combustion may facilitate carbon capture and sequestration by increasing the relative CO2 content of the combustion emission stream. However, the potential effect of enhanced oxygen combustion conditions on emissions of criteria and hazardous air pollutants has not been well studied. Combustion under oxyfuel conditions could produce emissions posing different risks than those currently being managed by the power industry. Therefore, before moving further with oxyfuel combustion as a new technology, it is appropriate to summarize the current understanding of potential emissions risk and to identify data gaps as priorities for future research.

[1]  K. Wester.  What is an acceptable risk? , 2012, World neurosurgery.

[2]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  An overview on oxyfuel coal combustion—State of the art research and technology development , 2009 .

[3]  M. Coleman,et al.  Cancer risks related to electricity production. , 1991, European journal of cancer.

[4]  H. Gibb,et al.  Evaluation of issues relating to the carcinogen risk assessment of chromium. , 1989, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  A Colli,et al.  Assessment of health risks due to hazardous air pollutant emissions from electric utilities. , 1997, Drug and chemical toxicology.

[6]  David C Dorman,et al.  The Speciation of Metals in Mammals Influences Their Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics and Therefore Human Health Risk Assessment , 2006, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[7]  Sayantan Sarkar,et al.  Health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals via dietary intake of vegetables grown in the vicinity of thermal power plants. , 2012, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[8]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  The impact of CO2 capture in the power and heat sector on the emission of SO2, NOx, particulate matter, volatile organic compounds and NH3 in the European Union , 2010 .

[9]  Noriyuki Imada,et al.  Study of Hg and SO3 behavior in flue gas of oxy-fuel combustion system , 2011 .

[10]  Terry Wall,et al.  Gas cleaning challenges for coal-fired oxy-fuel technology with carbon capture and storage , 2013 .

[11]  Terry Wall,et al.  Demonstrations of coal-fired oxy-fuel technology for carbon capture and storage and issues with commercial deployment , 2011 .

[12]  Hong Yao,et al.  Fine Ash Formation during Pulverized Coal CombustionA Comparison of O2/CO2 Combustion versus Air Combustion† , 2007 .

[13]  J. Wendt,et al.  Soot, unburned carbon and ultrafine particle emissions from air- and oxy-coal flames , 2011 .

[14]  Nicolas Perrin,et al.  Commercialization of oxy-coal combustion: Applying results of a large 30MWth pilot project , 2009 .

[15]  J. Lighty,et al.  Program topic: 1. Combustion particulate formation from pulverized coal under oxy-fuel combustion conditions , 2011 .

[16]  Jost O.L. Wendt,et al.  Ash and deposit formation from oxy-coal combustion in a 100kW test furnace , 2011 .

[17]  C. Shaddix,et al.  Particle imaging of ignition and devolatilization of pulverized coal during oxy-fuel combustion , 2009 .

[18]  Hong Yao,et al.  Ash particle formation during O2/CO2 combustion of pulverized coals , 2007 .

[19]  T. Wall,et al.  Sulphur impacts during pulverised coal combustion in oxy-fuel technology for carbon capture and storage , 2011 .

[20]  Jamie Bartram,et al.  Assessment of risk and risk management for water-related infectious disease , 2001 .

[21]  Ye Zhuang,et al.  Fate of hazardous air pollutants in oxygen-fired coal combustion with different flue gas recycling. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.