Compliant hip function simplifies control for hopping and running

Bouncing, balancing and swinging the leg forward can be considered as three basic control tasks for bipedal locomotion. Defining the trunk by an unstable inverted pendulum, balancing as being translated to trunk stabilization is the main focus of this paper. The control strategy is to generate a hip torque to have upright trunk to achieve robust hopping and running. It relies on the Virtual Pendulum (VP) concept which is recently proposed for trunk stabilization, based on human/animal locomotion analysis. Based on this concept, a control approach, named Virtual Pendulum Posture control (VPPC) is presented, in which the trunk is stabilized by redirecting the ground reaction force to a virtual support point. The required torques patterns generated by the controller, could partially be exerted by elastic structures like hip springs. Hybrid Zero Dynamics (HZD) control approach is also applied as an exact method of keeping the trunk upright. Stability of the motion which is investigated by Poincaré map analysis could be achieved by hip springs, VPPC and HZD. The results show that hip springs, revealing muscle properties, could facilitate trunk stabilization. Compliance in hip produces acceptable performance and robustness compared with VPPC and HZD, while it is a passive structure.

[1]  Takashi Emura,et al.  Symmetric Walking Control: Invariance and Global Stability , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Martin Buehler,et al.  A planar hopping robot with one actuator: design, simulation, and experimental results , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[3]  Juergen Rummel,et al.  Passive stabilization of the trunk in walking , 2010 .

[4]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  A movement criterion for running. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Christine Chevallereau,et al.  HZD-based control of a five-link underactuated 3D bipedal robot , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  Marc H. Raibert,et al.  Legged Robots That Balance , 1986, IEEE Expert.

[7]  Wendy L. Boehm,et al.  Force direction pattern stabilizes sagittal plane mechanics of human walking. , 2012, Human movement science.

[8]  R J Full,et al.  Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  T. McMahon,et al.  The mechanics of running: how does stiffness couple with speed? , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  A Disturbance Rejection Measure for Limit Cycle Walkers: The Gait Sensitivity Norm , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[11]  Michael Günther,et al.  Proof of concept: Model based bionic muscle with hyperbolic force-velocity relation , 2012 .

[12]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Hybrid zero dynamics of planar biped walkers , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[13]  Martin Buehler,et al.  Controlled passive dynamic running experiments with the ARL-monopod II , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  G.A. Pratt,et al.  Series elastic actuator development for a biomimetic walking robot , 1999, 1999 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (Cat. No.99TH8399).

[15]  Andre Seyfarth,et al.  Human leg adjustment in perturbed hopping , 2013 .

[16]  Arend L. Schwab,et al.  Adding an Upper Body to Passive Dynamic Walking Robots by Means of a Bisecting Hip Mechanism , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[17]  Ioannis Poulakakis,et al.  Formal embedding of the Spring Loaded Inverted Pendulum in an Asymmetric hopper , 2007, 2007 European Control Conference (ECC).

[18]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: A dynamic walking perspective. , 2007, Human movement science.

[19]  Susanne W. Lipfert,et al.  Upright human gait did not provide a major mechanical challenge for our ancestors. , 2010, Nature communications.

[20]  Majid Nili Ahmadabadi,et al.  Switching from hopping to running with HZD controller , 2014 .

[21]  Majid Nili Ahmadabadi,et al.  Controllers for robust hopping with upright trunk based on the Virtual Pendulum concept , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[22]  Jessy W. Grizzle,et al.  Hybrid Invariant Manifolds in Systems With Impulse Effects With Application to Periodic Locomotion in Bipedal Robots , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[23]  Majid Nili Ahmadabadi,et al.  Novel leg adjustment approach for hopping and running , 2013 .

[24]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Koushil Sreenath,et al.  MABEL, a new robotic bipedal walker and runner , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[26]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  RHex: A Simple and Highly Mobile Hexapod Robot , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[28]  Franck Plestan,et al.  Asymptotically stable walking for biped robots: analysis via systems with impulse effects , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[29]  A. Seyfarth,et al.  Stable Upright Walking and Running using a simple Pendulum based Control Scheme , 2008 .

[30]  R. Blickhan.  The spring-mass model for running and hopping. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  Jessy W. Grizzle,et al.  The Spring Loaded Inverted Pendulum as the Hybrid Zero Dynamics of an Asymmetric Hopper , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.