Employee's Use of Work-Family Policies and the Workplace Social Context

This article analyzes the effects of workplace social context on managers' and professionals' use of work-family policies in a financial services corporation. These official policies are ambiguous and contested and, as institutional theory implies, may fail to become fully implemented. We use a multilevel model to determine the individual-level and work group-level factors that affect respondents' policy use. In addition to individual-level factors, the social context of the work group affects employees' decisions to use work-family policies. We find support for our hypotheses stressing the social resource of power and protection: employees are more likely to use these policies if they work with powerful supervisors and colleagues, who can buffer them from perceived negative effects on their careers.

[1]  Mary Blair-Loy,et al.  CULTURAL CONSTRUCTIONS OF FAMILY SCHEMAS , 2001 .

[2]  E. Trzcinski,et al.  Taking Time: Parental Leave Policy and Corporate Culture , 1998 .

[3]  Barbara F. Reskin,et al.  Why Not Ascription? Organizations’ Employment of Male and Female Managers , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[4]  Sharon R. Bird,et al.  Social Context at Work: A Multilevel Analysis of Job Satisfaction , 2000 .

[5]  D. Guthrie,et al.  The State, Courts, and Equal Opportunities for Female CEOs in U.S. Organizations: Specifying Institutional Mechanisms , 1999 .

[6]  David J. Maume.  Glass Ceilings and Glass Escalators , 1999 .

[7]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  Civil Rights Law at Work: Sex Discrimination and the Rise of Maternity , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Christopher Uggen,et al.  The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Barbara F. Reskin,et al.  THE DETERMINANTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF WORKPLACE SEX AND RACE COMPOSITION , 1999 .

[10]  Barbara A. Gutek,et al.  Demographic Differences in Organizations: Current Research and Future Directions , 1999 .

[11]  Laura L. Beauvais,et al.  When Work–Family Benefits Are Not Enough: The Influence of Work–Family Culture on Benefit Utilization, Organizational Attachment, and Work–Family Conflict☆☆☆★ , 1999 .

[12]  D. Guthrie,et al.  The State, Courts, and Maternity Policies in U.S. Organizations: Specifying Institutional Mechanisms , 1999, American Sociological Review.

[13]  Sharon A. Lobel.  Impacts of Diversity and Work-Life Initiatives in Organizations , 1999 .

[14]  G. Powell.  Reflections on the glass ceiling: Recent trends and future prospects. , 1999 .

[15]  Huseyin Leblebici.  New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects , 1999 .

[16]  Nan Lin,et al.  SOCIAL NETWORKS AND STATUS ATTAINMENT , 1999 .

[17]  A. O'Leary-Kelly,et al.  Monkey See, Monkey Do: The Influence of Work Groups on the Antisocial Behavior of Employees , 1998 .

[18]  Ronald G. Ehrenberg,et al.  Gender and Family Issues in the Workplace , 1998 .

[19]  M. Cancian,et al.  Balancing act: Motherhood, marriage, and employment among American women , 1998 .

[20]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[21]  S. Davies-Netzley,et al.  Women above the Glass Ceiling , 1998 .

[22]  E. Kevin Kelloway,et al.  Flexible work arrangements : managing the work-family boundary , 1998 .

[23]  Ellen Galinsky,et al.  The 1997 National Study of the Changing Workforce , 1998 .

[24]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects , 1999 .

[25]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[26]  Jennifer Glass,et al.  The Family Responsive Workplace , 1997 .

[27]  Arlie Russell Hochschild,et al.  The Time Bind , 1997 .

[28]  A. Hochschild.  The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work , 1997 .

[29]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[30]  A. Abbott.  Of Time and Space: The Contemporary Relevance of the Chicago School , 1997 .

[31]  Leslie A. Perlow,et al.  Finding Time: How Corporations, Individuals, and Families Can Benefit from New Work Practices , 1997 .

[32]  Paul Osterman,et al.  Work Family Programs and the Employment Relationship , 1995 .

[33]  J. Glass,et al.  Employer Characteristics and the Provision of Family Responsive Policies , 1995 .

[34]  Tal Simons,et al.  Institutional and Resource Dependence Determinants of Responsiveness to Work-Family Issues , 1995 .

[35]  J. Jacobs.  Gender Inequality at Work. , 1995 .

[36]  James N. Baron,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations and Inequality , 1994 .

[37]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Substance and Symbolism in CEOs' Long-Term Incentive Plans , 1994 .

[38]  J. Goodstein.  Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer Involvement in Work-Family Issues , 1994 .

[39]  Thomas A. DiPrete,et al.  Multilevel Models: Methods and Substance , 1994 .

[40]  P. Stone,et al.  Gender and Racial Inequality at Work: The Sources and Consequences of Job Segregation. , 1994 .

[41]  H. Ibarra.  Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework , 1993 .

[42]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Organizational behavior: linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[43]  B. Reskin,et al.  Jobs, Authority, and Earnings Among Managers , 1992 .

[44]  Jennifer Glass,et al.  Gender, Parenthood, and Job-Family Compatibility , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  Jane E. Dutton,et al.  Understanding Organizational Adaptation to Change: The Case of Work-Family Issues , 1992 .

[46]  R. Rice,et al.  Attitudes toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing. , 1991 .

[47]  Juliet B. Schor,et al.  The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline Of Leisure , 1991 .

[48]  J. Rentsch.  Climate and culture : interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings , 1990 .

[49]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[50]  I. Simpson.  The Sociology of Work: Where Have the Workers Gone? , 1989 .

[51]  Robert Jackall,et al.  Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers , 1989 .

[52]  Paul DiMaggio.  Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[53]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Daniel J. Brass.  Men's and Women's Networks: A Study of Interaction Patterns and Influence In an Organization , 1985 .

[55]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Employee-Organization Linakges: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover , 1985 .

[56]  J. Galaskiewicz,et al.  Organizations and Organization Theory. , 1984 .

[57]  R. Berk.  An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. , 1983 .

[58]  L. Lomnitz.  Formal Organizations , 1982, Current Anthropology.

[59]  B. Campbell.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[60]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[61]  R. Mowday.  The Exercise of Upward Influence in Organizations. , 1978 .

[62]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[63]  F. Glen.  The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[64]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[65]  T. Caplow.  The Sociology of Work , 1954 .

[66]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .