POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1

Design science research (DSR) has staked its rightful ground as an important and legitimate Information Systems (IS) research paradigm. We contend that DSR has yet to attain its full potential impact on the development and use of information systems due to gaps in the understanding and application of DSR concepts and methods. This essay aims to help researchers (1) appreciate the levels of artifact abstractions that may be DSR contributions, (2) identify appropriate ways of consuming and producing knowledge when they are preparing journal articles or other scholarly works, (3) understand and position the knowledge contributions of their research projects, and (4) structure a DSR article so that it emphasizes significant contributions to the knowledge base. Our focal contribution is the DSR knowledge contribution framework with two dimensions based on the existing state of knowledge in both the problem and solution domains for the research opportunity under study. In addition, we propose a DSR communication schema with similarities to more conventional publication patterns, but which substitutes the description of the DSR artifact in place of a traditional results section. We evaluate the DSR contribution framework and the DSR communication schema via examinations of DSR exemplar publications.

[1]  Peter Axel Nielsen,et al.  Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems , 2012, ECIS 2012.

[2]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  Just Some Thoughts on How to Write One , 1994 .

[4]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project , 2008 .

[5]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Soft design science methodology , 2009, DESRIST.

[6]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[7]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[8]  C. Hempel Philosophy of Natural Science , 1966 .

[9]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Process Grammar as a Tool for Business Process Design , 2008, MIS Q..

[10]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Design Research in the Technology of Information Systems: Truth or Dare , 2002 .

[11]  Johann Füller,et al.  Co-Creation in Virtual Worlds: The Design of the User Experience , 2011, MIS Q..

[12]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[13]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Embodied Conversational Agent-Based Kiosk for Automated Interviewing , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Mikko T. Siponen,et al.  Improving Employees' Compliance Through Information Systems Security Training: An Action Research Study , 2010, MIS Q..

[15]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[16]  Chad Perry,et al.  A Structured Approach for Presenting Theses , 1998 .

[17]  Graham J. Williams,et al.  Data Mining - Theory, Methodology, Techniques, and Applications , 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[18]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[19]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[20]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Normative standards for IS research , 1994, DATB.

[21]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  The emergence of design research in information systems in North America , 2008 .

[22]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Yair Wand,et al.  Using Cognitive Principles to Guide Classification in Information Systems Modeling , 2008, MIS Q..

[25]  John F. Rockart,et al.  Executive Support Systems: The Emergence of Top Management Computer Use , 1988 .

[26]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[27]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[28]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[29]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Ramayya Krishnan,et al.  Correlated Failures, Diversification, and Information Security Risk Management , 2011, MIS Q..

[31]  Daniel C. Feldman,et al.  The Devil is in the Details: Converting Good Research into Publishable Articles , 2004 .

[32]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology , 2007 .

[33]  David F. Channell Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[34]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems , 2010 .

[35]  Daniel R. Dolk,et al.  Design Principles for Virtual Worlds , 2011, MIS Q..

[36]  W. Neuman,et al.  Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2006 .

[37]  J. Habermas The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[38]  Stephen R. Gardner Building the data warehouse , 1998, CACM.

[39]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Daryl J. Bem,et al.  Writing the Empirical Journal Article , 2021, The Compleat Academic.

[41]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Whom are we informing? issues and recommendations for MIS research from an informing sciences perspective 1 , 2009 .

[42]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  The Design Theory Nexus , 2008, MIS Q..

[43]  J. Colquitt,et al.  TRENDS IN THEORY BUILDING AND THEORY TESTING: A FIVE-DECADE STUDY OF THE ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL , 2007 .

[44]  S. Carlsson Design Science Research in Information Systems: A Critical Realist Approach , 2010 .

[45]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  P. Varadarajan,et al.  Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures‐based study , 1990 .

[48]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  The compleat academic : a practical guide for the beginning social scientist , 1987 .

[49]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases , 1993, SIGMOD Conference.

[50]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gain , 1991 .

[51]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: why top journals accept your paper , 2009 .

[52]  F. Rawlins Episteme and Techne , 1950 .

[53]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  The Creativity Conundrum: A Propulsion Model of Kinds of Creative Contributions , 2001 .

[54]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  A Multilevel Model for Measuring Fit Between a Firm's Competitive Strategies and Information Systems Capabilities , 2011, MIS Q..

[56]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Toward a broader vision for Information Systems , 2011, TMIS.

[57]  R. Merton Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[58]  Göran Goldkuhl Anchoring scientific abstractions - ontological and linguistic determination following socio-instrumental pragmatism , 2002 .

[59]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[60]  Yair Wand,et al.  Guidelines for Designing Visual Ontologies to Support Knowledge Identification , 2011, MIS Q..

[61]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Editor’s comments: rigor and relevance in is research: redefining the debate and a call for future research , 2011 .

[62]  M. Bunge Philosophy of Science: Volume 2, From Explanation to Justification , 1998 .

[63]  YuanYufei,et al.  A multilevel model for measuring fit between a firm's competitive strategies and information systems capabilities , 2011 .

[64]  Justin Zobel,et al.  Writing for Computer Science , 2014, Springer London.

[65]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[66]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  CyberGate: A Design Framework and System for Text Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication , 2008, MIS Q..

[68]  James R Wilson,et al.  Responsible authorship and peer review , 2002, Science and engineering ethics.

[69]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[70]  Omar A. El Sawy,et al.  Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful Was our 1992 Initial Rendition? , 2004 .

[71]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[72]  Peter Mertens,et al.  Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[73]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Design science and the accumulation of knowledge in the information systems discipline , 2012, TMIS.

[74]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation , 2008, ECIS.

[75]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[76]  K. Weick What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[77]  S. Gould,et al.  Exaptation—a Missing Term in the Science of Form , 1982, Paleobiology.

[78]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[79]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[80]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Commentary on Gill and Bhattacherjee: is there an informing crisis? , 2009 .

[81]  Allen S. Lee Editor's comments: MIS quarterly's editorial policies and practices , 2001 .

[82]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Detecting Fake Websites: The Contribution of Statistical Learning Theory , 2010, MIS Q..

[83]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Catch data warehouse: support for community health care decision-making , 2003, Decision Support Systems.

[84]  Dongsong Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Tree-View Based Presentation Adaptation on Model Web Browsing , 2011, MIS Q..

[85]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Making Sense of Technology Trends in the Information Technology Landscape: A Design Science Approach , 2008, MIS Q..