A general multi-trait-based framework for studying the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning.

Environmental change is as multifaceted as are the species and communities that respond to these changes. Current theoretical approaches to modeling ecosystem response to environmental change often deal only with single environmental drivers or single species traits, simple ecological interactions, and/or steady states, leading to concern about how accurately these approaches will capture future responses to environmental change in real biological systems. To begin addressing this issue, we generalize a previous trait-based framework to incorporate aspects of frequency dependence, functional complementarity, and the dynamics of systems composed of species that are defined by multiple traits that are tied to multiple environmental drivers. The framework is particularly well suited for analyzing the role of temporal environmental fluctuations in maintaining trait variability and the resultant effects on community response to environmental change. Using this framework, we construct simple models to investigate two ecological problems. First, we show how complementary resource use can significantly enhance the nutrient uptake of plant communities through two different mechanisms related to increased productivity (over-yielding) and larger trait variability. Over-yielding is a hallmark of complementarity and increases the total biomass of the community and, thus, the total rate at which nutrients are consumed. Trait variability also increases due to the lower levels of competition associated with complementarity, thus speeding up the rate at which more efficient species emerge as conditions change. Second, we study systems in which multiple environmental drivers act on species defined by multiple, correlated traits. We show that correlations in these systems can increase trait variability within the community and again lead to faster responses to environmental change. The methodological advances provided here will apply to almost any function that relates species traits and environmental drivers to growth, and should prove useful for studying the effects of climate change on the dynamics of biota.

[1]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Plant tolerance and resistance in food webs: community-level predictions and evolutionary implications , 2000, Evolutionary Ecology.

[2]  T. Smith,et al.  Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations , 2005 .

[3]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience , 2003 .

[4]  J. Facelli,et al.  The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity. Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions , 2003 .

[5]  J. P. Grime Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function: The Debate Deepens , 1997, Science.

[6]  J. Downing,et al.  Biodiversity and stability in grasslands , 1996, Nature.

[7]  Peter Chesson,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL NICHES AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING , 2006 .

[8]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species , 1997 .

[9]  C. Tucker,et al.  Climate-Driven Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 1982 to 1999 , 2003, Science.

[10]  R. Lande QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Jon Norberg,et al.  Biodiversity in metacommunities: Plankton as complex adaptive systems? , 2004 .

[13]  Marcel E. Visser,et al.  Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  P. Reich,et al.  The Evolution of Plant Functional Variation: Traits, Spectra, and Strategies , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[15]  Bruno Eckhardt,et al.  Effective variables in ecosystem models with an application to phytoplankton succession , 1996 .

[16]  Francisco J. Ayala,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Selection , 1974 .

[17]  John P. Smol,et al.  Fisheries productivity in the northeastern Pacific Ocean over the past 2,200 years , 2002, Nature.

[18]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.

[19]  Peter B Reich,et al.  Variation in growth rate and ecophysiology among 34 grassland and savanna species under contrasting N supply: a test of functional group differences. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[20]  P. Chesson Multispecies Competition in Variable Environments , 1994 .

[21]  B. Enquist,et al.  Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  J. Read,et al.  Do temperate rainforest trees have a greater ability to acclimate to changing temperatures than tropical rainforest trees? , 2003, The New phytologist.

[23]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[24]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Species Compensation and Complementarity in Ecosystem Function , 1995 .

[25]  G. van der Velde,et al.  Ecological niches. Linking classical and contemporary approaches , 2008 .

[26]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[27]  Marcel E. Visser,et al.  Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  S. Schneider,et al.  Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants , 2003, Nature.

[30]  P. Reich,et al.  Species and functional group diversity independently influence biomass accumulation and its response to CO2 and N. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[32]  K. Thompson,et al.  Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants , 1997 .

[33]  B. Beckage,et al.  Overyielding and species diversity: what should we expect? , 2006, The New phytologist.

[34]  Clarence Lehman,et al.  8. Competition in Spatial Habitats , 1998 .

[35]  David Tilman,et al.  An evolutionary approach to ecosystem functioning , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  J. Fargione,et al.  Diversity decreases invasion via both sampling and complementarity effects , 2005 .

[37]  Amy J. Symstad,et al.  Functional diversity revealed by removal experiments , 2003 .

[38]  Dr. Tom Andersen,et al.  Pelagic Nutrient Cycles , 1997, Ecological Studies.

[39]  J. Lawton,et al.  Linking Species and Ecosystems , 1996 .

[40]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  Vegetation processes in the pelagic : a model for ecosystem theory , 1997 .

[41]  D. Tilman,et al.  Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems , 1996, Nature.

[42]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Impacts of multiple stressors on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the role of species co‐tolerance , 2004 .

[43]  William R. Harcombe,et al.  Frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry , 2001, Nature.

[44]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[45]  R. Lande NATURAL SELECTION AND RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  Eric Garnier,et al.  From Plant Traits to Plant Communities: A Statistical Mechanistic Approach to Biodiversity , 2006, Science.

[47]  N. Barton,et al.  Natural and sexual selection on many loci. , 1991, Genetics.

[48]  J. Bruno,et al.  Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory , 2003 .

[49]  J. A. Allen,et al.  Frequency-dependent selection by predators. , 1988, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[50]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[51]  J Norberg,et al.  Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environments: A theoretical framework , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  N. Barton,et al.  Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what, me normal? , 1994, Genetics.

[53]  Jon Norberg,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: A complex adaptive systems approach , 2004 .

[54]  O. Zyryanova,et al.  Ecological Studies , 1911, Nature.

[55]  Hiroyuki Matsuda,et al.  Timid Consumers: Self-Extinction Due to Adaptive Change in Foraging and Anti-predator Effort , 1994 .

[56]  David Tilman,et al.  Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.