Comparison between actin filament models: coarse-graining reveals essential differences.

The interconversion of actin between monomeric and polymeric forms is a fundamental process in cell biology that is incompletely understood, in part because there is no high-resolution structure for filamentous actin. Several models have been proposed recently; identifying structural and dynamic differences between them is an essential step toward understanding actin dynamics. We compare three of these models, using coarse-grained analysis of molecular dynamics simulations to analyze the differences between them and evaluate their relative stability. Based on this analysis, we identify key motions that may be associated with polymerization, including a potential energetic barrier in the process. We also find that actin subunits are polymorphic; during simulations they assume a range of configurations remarkably similar to those seen in recent cryoEM images.

[1]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[2]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Allostery of actin filaments: molecular dynamics simulations and coarse-grained analysis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. E. Estes,et al.  The tightly bound divalent cation regulates actin polymerization. , 1983, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[4]  Roberto Dominguez,et al.  Actin structure and function. , 2011, Annual review of biophysics.

[5]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Water molecules in the nucleotide binding cleft of actin: effects on subunit conformation and implications for ATP hydrolysis. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  L. Otterbein,et al.  The Crystal Structure of Uncomplexed Actin in the ADP State , 2001, Science.

[7]  M. Klein,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms , 1994 .

[8]  Kimihide Hayakawa,et al.  Actin filaments function as a tension sensor by tension-dependent binding of cofilin to the filament , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  Roberto Dominguez,et al.  Crystal Structure of Monomeric Actin in the ATP State , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Edward H. Egelman,et al.  Structural Polymorphism in F-actin , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[11]  Yuichiro Maéda,et al.  The nature of the globular- to fibrous-actin transition , 2009, Nature.

[12]  Jim Pfaendtner,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent conformational states of actin , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Karthikeyan Diraviyam,et al.  Nucleotide effects on the structure and dynamics of actin. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[14]  D. Sept,et al.  F-actin structure destabilization and DNase I binding loop: fluctuations mutational cross-linking and electron microscopy analysis of loop states and effects on F-actin. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Michael K Gilson,et al.  Extraction of configurational entropy from molecular simulations via an expansion approximation. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[16]  Keiichi Namba,et al.  Direct visualization of secondary structures of F-actin by electron cryomicroscopy , 2010, Nature.

[17]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Atomic model of the actin filament , 1990, Nature.

[18]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[19]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[20]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Coarse-grained modeling of the actin filament derived from atomistic-scale simulations. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Thomas D. Pollard,et al.  Actin, a Central Player in Cell Shape and Movement , 2009, Science.

[22]  Shin'ichi Ishiwata,et al.  Mechanical distortion of single actin filaments induced by external force: detection by fluorescence imaging. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[23]  E. Egelman,et al.  Actin Filaments as Tension Sensors , 2012, Current Biology.

[24]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  Michael K. Gilson,et al.  Thermodynamic and Differential Entropy under a Change of Variables , 2010, Entropy.

[26]  Frank Noé,et al.  Structural modeling and molecular dynamics simulation of the actin filament , 2011, Proteins.

[27]  F. Brooks,et al.  Actin polymerization overshoots and ATP hydrolysis as assayed by pyrene fluorescence. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Jim Pfaendtner,et al.  Structure and dynamics of the actin filament. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  B. Brooks,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method , 1995 .

[30]  E. Egelman,et al.  A change in actin conformation associated with filament instability after Pi release. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.