Temporal and spatial variation of stress field in Taiwan from 1991 to 2007: Insights from comprehensive first motion focal mechanism catalog

article i nfo The total amount of 4,761 focal mechanisms was determined based on P-wave first motion polarities from 1991 to 2007 in Taiwan region. This dataset offers us a good opportunity to examine temporal and spatial variability of the stress field. We find that the spatial variations of stress axes are mainly controlled by tectonic structures while the temporal changes are greatly influenced by the Chi-Chi earthquake. The orientation of the maximum horizontal compressive stress axes (SH) shows a general agreement with the direction of plate motion between a depth range of 0-30 km. The 20° anticlockwise rotation of SH from the Longitudinal Valley (LV) to western Taiwan is probably caused by the left-lateral motion on the Longitudinal Valley Fault (LVF) that has consumed part of the oblique motion of plate convergence. On the other hand, part of the oblique convergence is transferred into the Central Range and the Hsuehshan Range judging from counterclockwise rotation of SH from east to west and strike-slip faulting in the Hsuehshan Range. Most events with a depth greater than 30 km occur offshore eastern Taiwan and the azimuth of SH is close to E-W directed, different from NW-SE directed at shallow depths. This may infer the existence of the transition of lithosphere rheology in offshore eastern Taiwan. The trends of SH in the depth of 0-10 km are strongly affected by the coseismic stress change of the Chi-Chi earthquake. In the northern half of the Chi-Chi rupture area, the trends of SH rotate 30° clockwise and the stress ratio increased by a factor of six after the mainshock. The orientations of SH still differ by 30° in 2007 comparing to that in the period before the Chi- Chi earthquake. The variation of SH trend is more diverse in the southern half of the rupture area, showing 20° counterclockwise rotation immediately after the 1999 mainshock followed by a clockwise rotation. The trend of SH returns to the pre-seismic direction of 110° in 2001. These notable changes of SH before and after the Chi-Chi mainshock suggests that the magnitude of background stress in the rupture area is close to the coseismic stress drop. We also recognize a significant 10° counterclockwise rotation of SH in the entire Chi- Chi rupture area between 1991 and 1999 before the earthquake took place. However, to the south of the Chi- Chi rupture, the trends of SH remain little changed before and after the Chi-Chi earthquake.

[1]  Hugo Perfettini,et al.  Postseismic relaxation driven by brittle creep: A possible mechanism to reconcile geodetic measurements and the decay rate of aftershocks, application to the Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan , 2004 .

[2]  Tzay-Chyn Shin,et al.  Coseismic versus interseismic ground deformations, fault rupture inversion and segmentation revealed by 2003 Mw 6.8 Chengkung earthquake in eastern Taiwan , 2006 .

[3]  Chi‐Yue Huang,et al.  Temporal and spatial records of active arc-continent collision in Taiwan: A synthesis , 2006 .

[4]  Chien-Chih Chen,et al.  Seismic reversal pattern for the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, MW 7.6 earthquake , 2007 .

[5]  L. Chiao,et al.  Seismic Quiescence before the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Mw 7.6 Earthquake , 2006 .

[6]  Nai-Chi Hsiao,et al.  Relocation of the 2006 Pingtung Earthquake sequence and seismotectonics in Southern Taiwan , 2009 .

[7]  Yue‐Gau Chen,et al.  Seismogenic faults along the major suture of the plate boundary deduced by dislocation modeling of coseismic displacements of the 1951 M7.3 Hualien–Taitung earthquake sequence in eastern Taiwan , 2008 .

[8]  R. Rau,et al.  Focal mechanisms and seismotectonic stress in North Central Taiwan in relation with the Chi-Chi earthquake , 2009 .

[9]  Chien‐Hsin Chang,et al.  Improved seismic tomography offshore northeastern Taiwan: Implications for subduction and collision processes between Taiwan and the southernmost Ryukyu , 2009 .

[10]  Shui-Beih Yu,et al.  Velocity field of GPS stations in the Taiwan area , 1997 .

[11]  Tzay-Chyn Shin,et al.  An Overview of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2004 .

[12]  Louis S. Teng.  Geotectonic evolution of late Cenozoic arc-continent collision in Taiwan , 1990 .

[13]  Li Zhao,et al.  A Comprehensive Relocation of Earthquakes in Taiwan from 1991 to 2005 , 2008 .

[14]  Y. Hsu,et al.  Preseismic deformation and coseismic displacements associated With the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2004 .

[15]  E. Mullen,et al.  The 40‐keV electron durable trapping region , 1984 .

[16]  Chien‐Hsin Chang,et al.  Aftershocks of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: The First Hour , 2007 .

[17]  Jean-Philippe Avouac,et al.  Spatio-temporal Slip, and Stress Level on the Faults within the Western Foothills of Taiwan: Implications for Fault Frictional Properties , 2009 .

[18]  C. Frohlich.  Display and quantitative assessment of distributions of earthquake focal mechanisms , 2001 .

[19]  Francis T. Wu,et al.  Seismogenic structure in a tectonic suture zone: With new constraints from 2006 Mw6.1 Taitung earthquake , 2006 .

[20]  Andrew J. Michael,et al.  Determination of stress from slip data: Faults and folds , 1984 .

[21]  Y. Tsai,et al.  STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTATION PROGRAMS IN TAIWAN , 2005 .

[22]  J. Angelier,et al.  Variations along the strike of the Taiwan thrust belt: Basement control on structural style, wedge geometry, and kinematics , 2002 .

[23]  Mark Simons,et al.  Interseismic crustal deformation in the Taiwan plate boundary zone revealed by GPS observations, seismicity, and earthquake focal mechanisms , 2008 .

[24]  Y. Hsu,et al.  Focal-Mechanism Determination in Taiwan by Genetic Algorithm , 2008 .

[25]  Yih‐Min Wu,et al.  Approximate recovery of coseismic deformation from Taiwan strong-motion records , 2007 .

[26]  Andrew J. Michael,et al.  Use of focal mechanisms to determine stress: A control study , 1987 .

[27]  Chien‐Hsin Chang,et al.  Relocation of the 1998 Rueyli, Taiwan, Earthquake Sequence Using Three-dimensions Velocity Structure with Stations Corrections , 2003 .

[28]  Yue‐Gau Chen,et al.  New seismogenic source and deep structures revealed by the 1999 Chia-yi earthquake sequence in southwestern Taiwan , 2008 .

[29]  Chu-Chuan Peter Tsai,et al.  Estimates of Stress Drop of the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake of 20 September 1999 from Near-Field Seismograms , 2004 .

[30]  A correlation between the b-value and the fractal dimension from the aftershock sequence of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake , 2006 .

[31]  Chien‐Hsin Chang,et al.  Relocation of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake in Taiwan , 2000 .

[32]  Yi-Ben Tsai,et al.  Preface to the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake Dedicated Issue , 2004 .

[33]  Shui-Beih Yu,et al.  Coseismic and postseismic deformation associated with the 2003 Chengkung, Taiwan, earthquake , 2009 .

[34]  Shui-Beih Yu,et al.  Coseismic Movement and Seismic Ground Motion Associated with the 31 March 2002 off Hualien, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2004 .

[35]  Björn Lund,et al.  Calculating horizontal stress orientations with full or partial knowledge of the tectonic stress tensor , 2007 .

[36]  H. Kao,et al.  Transition from oblique subduction to collision: Earthquakes in the southernmost Ryukyu arc‐Taiwan region , 1998 .

[37]  Y. Hsu,et al.  Coseismic displacements and slip distribution from GPS and leveling observations for the 2006 Peinan earthquake (Mw 6.1) in southeastern Taiwan , 2009 .

[38]  Jyr-Ching Hu,et al.  Coseismic deformation revealed by inversion of strong motion and GPS data: the 2003 Chengkung earthquake in eastern Taiwan , 2007 .

[39]  Shu-Hao Chang,et al.  Mechanical Properties, Slip and Nucleation of the 1999 Chia-Yi Earthquake: the Question of Static Stress Influence from the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake , 2006 .

[40]  K. Sieh,et al.  Seismic tomography of Taiwan: Improved constraints from a dense network of strong motion stations , 2007 .