Clinical Significance of BD Bactec FX Blood Culture Incubation Beyond 96 Hours (4 Days)

Blood cultures (BC) for bacteria and yeast have traditionally been incubated for 5 days using modern instruments. Many organisms may grow sooner, and the need for the full 5-day incubation period has been questioned. ABSTRACT Blood cultures (BC) for bacteria and yeast have traditionally been incubated for 5 days using modern instruments. Many organisms may grow sooner, and the need for the full 5-day incubation period has been questioned. This study evaluated the clinical significance of isolates recovered beyond 96 h. A retrospective chart review was conducted on all positive BC (+BC) performed via BD Bactec FX with >96 h of incubation from 5/2019 to 1/2022 at the UW Health University Hospital clinical microbiology laboratory. A total of 59,958 BC were performed; 6,031 (10%) were +BC. Of +BC, 104 (2%) demonstrated growth >96 h. The 104 cultures were from 89 patients and included 12 (12%) Staphylococcus aureus (1 MRSA), 9 (9%) yeast (8 Candida sp.), 8 (8%) Escherichia coli and 7 (7%) Enterococcus sp. (1 VRE) isolates. Fifty-six percent (n = 50) of the 89 +BC >96 h cases were clinically significant, and 26% (n = 13) resulted in antibiotic adjustments based on the +BC; 4 of these had previous positive cultures. Of the remaining 37 clinically significant +BC >96 h for which no antibiotic changes were made, 32 patients had previous positive cultures. The majority (98%) of BC bottles were positive before 96 h. For isolates that required >96 h, most (56%) were considered clinically significant, including S. aureus and E. coli cultures. Changes to antibiotic therapy were made in a minority (26%) of clinically significant cases. Based on these findings, under routine conditions, laboratories using BD Bactec FX should maintain a 120 h incubation period.

[1]  H. Jacquier,et al.  Seasonal variations in blood culture numbers and time to positivity and potential impact of reducing incubation periods , 2021, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

[2]  Meghan A. Wallace,et al.  Evaluation of Optimal Blood Culture Incubation Time To Maximize Clinically Relevant Results from a Contemporary Blood Culture Instrument and Media System , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  Ni Zhang,et al.  Comparative evaluation of BACTEC FX, BacT/ALERT 3D, and BacT/ALERT VIRTUO automated blood culture systems using simulated blood cultures , 2020, Acta clinica Belgica.

[4]  H. Masur,et al.  Considerations for Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock in an Era of Antimicrobial Resistance. , 2020, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  L. Westblade,et al.  Bacteremia and Blood Culture Utilization during COVID-19 Surge in New York City , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[6]  J. Strahilevitz,et al.  A simplified blood culture sampling protocol for reducing contamination and costs: a randomized controlled trial. , 2020, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[7]  Wonkeun Song,et al.  A comparative evaluation of BACT/ALERT FA PLUS and FN PLUS blood culture bottles and BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic and Anaerobic blood culture bottles for antimicrobial neutralization , 2019, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

[8]  K. Garey,et al.  Economic health care costs of blood culture contamination: A systematic review. , 2019, American journal of infection control.

[9]  H. Rakugi,et al.  Clinical impact of extended blood culture examination: Too much of a good thing. , 2019, Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy.

[10]  B. Posteraro,et al.  In vitro Evaluation of BACT/ALERT® VIRTUO®, BACT/ALERT 3D®, and BACTEC™ FX Automated Blood Culture Systems for Detection of Microbial Pathogens Using Simulated Human Blood Samples , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[11]  A. Torchyan,et al.  Time-to-detection of bacteria and yeast with the BACTEC FX versus BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture systems , 2018, Annals of Saudi medicine.

[12]  T. Mazzulli,et al.  Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of BacT/Alert Virtuo Blood Culture System , 2017, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  M. Al-Hasan,et al.  Overall burden of bloodstream infection and nosocomial bloodstream infection in North America and Europe. , 2013, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[14]  K. Riesenberg,et al.  Reduction of blood culture contamination rate by an educational intervention. , 2006, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[15]  P. Bourbeau,et al.  Routine Incubation of BacT/ALERT FA and FN Blood Culture Bottles for More than 3 Days May Not Be Necessary , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  Kirk A Easley,et al.  Reassessment of the routine anaerobic culture and incubation time in the BacT/Alert FAN blood culture bottles. , 1999, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[17]  W. Dunne,et al.  Four-day incubation period for blood culture bottles processed with the Difco ESP blood culture system , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.