Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers.

BACKGROUND & AIMS A consensus has been reached that liver donor allocation should be based primarily on liver disease severity and that waiting time should not be a major determining factor. Our aim was to assess the capability of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score to correctly rank potential liver recipients according to their severity of liver disease and mortality risk on the OPTN liver waiting list. METHODS The MELD model predicts liver disease severity based on serum creatinine, serum total bilirubin, and INR and has been shown to be useful in predicting mortality in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. In this study, we prospectively applied the MELD score to estimate 3-month mortality to 3437 adult liver transplant candidates with chronic liver disease who were added to the OPTN waiting list at 2A or 2B status between November, 1999, and December, 2001. RESULTS In this study cohort with chronic liver disease, 412 (12%) died during the 3-month follow-up period. Waiting list mortality increased directly in proportion to the listing MELD score. Patients having a MELD score <9 experienced a 1.9% mortality, whereas patients having a MELD score > or =40 had a mortality rate of 71.3%. Using the c-statistic with 3-month mortality as the end point, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the MELD score was 0.83 compared with 0.76 for the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that the MELD score is able to accurately predict 3-month mortality among patients with chronic liver disease on the liver waiting list and can be applied for allocation of donor livers.

[1]  C. G. Child,et al.  Surgery and portal hypertension. , 1964, Major problems in clinical surgery.

[2]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[3]  V. Mazzaferro,et al.  Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  O. Chazouilleres,et al.  Prothrombin time in liver failure: Time, ratio, activity percentage, or international normalized ratio , 1996, Hepatology.

[5]  Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network--HRSA. Final rule with comment period. , 1998, Federal register.

[6]  R. Freeman,et al.  Liver transplant waiting time does not correlate with waiting list mortality: Implications for liver allocation policy , 2000, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[7]  P. Kamath,et al.  A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts , 2000, Hepatology.

[8]  Eric B. Edwards,et al.  MELD and PELD: Application of survival models to liver allocation , 2001, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[9]  T. Therneau,et al.  A model to predict survival in patients with end‐stage liver disease , 2001 .

[10]  Preliminary results of a liver allocation plan using a continuous medical severity score that de‐emphasizes waiting time , 2001, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.