Comparison of different en bloc holmium laser enucleation of the prostate techniques to reduce the rate of postoperative transient urinary incontinence

Objective To investigate postoperative risk factors for transient urinary incontinence (TUI) after different en bloc holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) techniques. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 169 consecutive patients who underwent HoLEP using the original en bloc technique (n = 41), en bloc with early mucosal strip detachment technique (n = 72), and three horseshoe-shaped incisions technique (n = 56) to treat bladder outlet obstruction from January 2017 to October 2019. Preoperative variables and surgical quality indexes were compared between the groups. TUI was defined as any hygienic or social problem caused by involuntary loss of urine at 2 weeks postoperatively. The postvoid residual urine volume, maximum urinary flow rate, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were assessed. Results Among all three techniques, the three horseshoe-shaped incisions technique was significantly associated with the lowest incidence of TUI and the lowest IPSS. Although not statistically significant, the three horseshoe-shaped incisions group also showed a trend toward a faster enucleation time. No life-threatening intraoperative complications occurred in any group. Conclusion Use of three horseshoe-shaped incisions in en bloc HoLEP prevented urethral sphincter damage with a low rate of postoperative TUI. Further long-term, multicenter comparative assessment is required. Research Registry number: 6848

[1]  N. Suardi,et al.  ‘En Bloc’ HoLEP with early apical release in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia , 2019, World Journal of Urology.

[2]  D. Schoeb,et al.  “Three horse shoe-like incision” holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: first experience with a novel en bloc technique for anatomic transurethral prostatectomy , 2018, World Journal of Urology.

[3]  M. Fujisawa,et al.  Does Surgeon Experience Affect Operative Time, Adverse Events and Continence Outcomes in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate? A Review of More Than 1,000 Cases , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[4]  L. Rapoport,et al.  Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) for Small, Large and Giant Prostatic Hyperplasia: Tips and Tricks , 2017, Urologia.

[5]  C. Cracco,et al.  The en-bloc no-touch holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) technique , 2016, World Journal of Urology.

[6]  Bhavan Prasad Rai,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation versus simple prostatectomy for treating large prostates: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, Arab journal of urology.

[7]  S. Okada,et al.  En-Bloc Technique With Anteroposterior Dissection Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Allows a Short Operative Time and Acceptable Outcomes. , 2015, Urology.

[8]  Jeong Zoo Lee,et al.  Risk Factors for Transient Urinary Incontinence after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate , 2015, The world journal of men's health.

[9]  Z. Meng,et al.  Holmium Laser Enucleation versus Transurethral Resection in Patients with Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: An Updated Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  F. Chun,et al.  Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate and simple open prostatectomy--which procedure is faster? , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Yue-Feng Du,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a modified enucleation technique and initial results. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[12]  A. Fujisaki,et al.  Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP: a modification to prevent transient stress urinary incontinence. , 2010, Urology.

[13]  M. Tyson,et al.  Stress incontinence during the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[14]  Jong Bouk Lee,et al.  Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Effectiveness, Safety, and Overcoming of the Learning Curve , 2010, Korean journal of urology.

[15]  H. Shah,et al.  Influence of prostate size on the outcome of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate , 2008, BJU international.

[16]  R. Hurle,et al.  Three-year outcome following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation in 330 consecutive patients. , 2008, European urology.

[17]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[18]  Amol P Mahajan,et al.  Peri‐operative complications of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: experience in the first 280 patients, and a review of literature , 2007, BJU international.

[19]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center prospective randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[20]  S. Ahyai,et al.  Does perioperative outcome of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate depend on prostate size? , 2004, Journal of endourology.

[21]  Naoko Kinukawa,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation for prostatic adenoma: analysis of learning curve over the course of 70 consecutive cases. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[22]  James E Lingeman,et al.  Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP): A Technical Update , 2003, World journal of surgical oncology.

[23]  P. Gilling,et al.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) combined with transurethral tissue morcellation: an update on the early clinical experience. , 1998, Journal of endourology.

[24]  M. Fall,et al.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.