The diabetic foot: initial experience with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

UNLABELLED Osteomyelitis complicates up to one third of diabetic foot infections, is often due to direct contamination from a soft-tissue lesion, and represents a clinical challenge. Early diagnosis is important since antibiotic therapy can be curative and may prevent amputation. The present study assessed the role of PET/CT using 18F-FDG for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. METHODS Fourteen diabetic patients (10 men and 4 women; age range, 29-70 y) with 18 clinically suspected sites of infection underwent PET/CT after the injection of 185-370 MBq of 18F-FDG for suspected osteomyelitis complicating diabetic foot disease. PET, CT, and hybrid images were independently evaluated for the diagnosis and localization of an infectious process. Additional data provided by PET/CT for localization of infection in the bone or soft tissues were recorded. The final diagnosis was based on histopathologic findings and bacteriologic assays obtained at surgery or at clinical and imaging follow-up. RESULTS PET detected 14 foci of increased 18F-FDG uptake suspected as infection in 10 patients. PET/CT correctly localized 8 foci in 4 patients to bone, indicating osteomyelitis. PET/CT correctly excluded osteomyelitis in 5 foci in 5 patients, with the abnormal 18F-FDG uptake limited to infected soft tissues only. One site of mildly increased focal 18F-FDG uptake was localized by PET/CT to diabetic osteoarthropathy changes demonstrated on CT. Four patients showed no abnormally increased 18F-FDG uptake and no further evidence of an infectious process on clinical and imaging follow-up. CONCLUSION 18F-FDG PET can be used for diagnosis of diabetes-related infection. The precise anatomic localization of increased 18F-FDG uptake provided by PET/CT enables accurate differentiation between osteomyelitis and soft-tissue infection.

[1]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  MR imaging of the diabetic foot. , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[2]  J. Knuuti,et al.  Comparative 18F-FDG PET of experimental Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis and normal bone healing. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  W. Morrison,et al.  Work-up of the diabetic foot. , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[4]  W. G. Batte,et al.  Osteomyelitis of the foot: relative importance of primary and secondary MR imaging signs. , 1998, Radiology.

[5]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  MR image analysis of pedal osteomyelitis: distribution, patterns of spread, and frequency of associated ulceration and septic arthritis. , 2002, Radiology.

[6]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Infection imaging using whole-body FDG-PET , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  V. Ladam-Marcus,et al.  MR imaging of osteomyelitis and neuropathic osteoarthropathy in the feet of diabetics. , 1996, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[8]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  Does diabetes affect [18F]FDG standardised uptake values in lung cancer? , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  R. Dierckx,et al.  Promising Role of 18-F-Fluoro-D-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Clinical Infectious Diseases , 2002, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[10]  G. Glatting,et al.  FDG PET: elevated plasma glucose reduces both uptake and detection rate of pancreatic malignancies. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  W. Oyen,et al.  Clinical value of FDG PET in patients with fever of unknown origin and patients suspected of focal infection or inflammation , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  R. Wahl,et al.  Rapid detection of human infections with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: preliminary results , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  E. Sella,et al.  Imaging modalities of the diabetic foot. , 2003, Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery.

[14]  W. Oyen,et al.  Imaging infection/inflammation in the new millennium , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  S. Larson,et al.  Preoperative F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value predicts survival after lung cancer resection. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  H. Zhuang,et al.  Do high glucose levels have differential effect on FDG uptake in inflammatory and malignant disorders? , 2001, Nuclear medicine communications.

[17]  J. Keyes SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Wendy S. Becker Imaging osteomyelitis and the diabetic foot. , 1999, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[19]  R. Frykberg An evidence-based approach to diabetic foot infections. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[20]  Z. Keidar,et al.  The fusion of anatomic and physiologic imaging in the management of patients with cancer. , 2001, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[21]  R. Wahl,et al.  Uptake of positron emission tomography tracers in experimental bacterial infections: a comparative biodistribution study of radiolabeled FDG, thymidine, l-methionine, 67Ga-citrate, and 125I-HSA , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  A. Greenspan,et al.  A musculoskeletal radiologist's view of nuclear medicine. , 1997, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[23]  C. Palestro,et al.  Radionuclide imaging in orthopedic infections. , 1997, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[24]  A. Alavi,et al.  The promising role of 18F-FDG PET in detecting infected lower limb prosthesis implants. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.