Age Moderates Contrast Effects in Women's Judgments of Facial Attractiveness

Physical attractiveness is an important individual characteristic in most social situations. Contrast effects occur when the perceived attractiveness of an individual is lower in the context of highly attractive others or vice versa. We used mate-selection theory to predict the effects of raters’ age and age of rated faces on contrast effects in women’s attractiveness judgments. Younger (18 –27 years) and older (50 years) women rated the attractiveness of an average-looking younger or older female or younger or older male target person, after having rated a series of 5 other photos that were either highly attractive or average looking. Strong contrast effects were found for younger women rating images of younger men and women, and for older women rating images of older men, such that the same target face was rated more attractive when the context images were average looking than when they were highly attractive. Weak or nonsignificant contrast effects were found among younger women rating images of older men and older women, and among older women rating images of younger men. Contrary to predictions, no contrast effects were found for older women rating images of either younger or older women. The overall pattern of findings suggests that the salience of physical attractiveness cues may vary functionally between younger and older women and emphasizes the importance of motivational influences on evaluative processes.

[1]  A. Little,et al.  Facial attractiveness. , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[2]  Daniel S. Hamermesh,et al.  Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful , 2011 .

[3]  L. Clarke,et al.  Aging and the Body: A Review* , 2011, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.

[4]  Susan C. Roberts,et al.  Circum-menopausal changes in women's preferences for sexually dimorphic shape cues in peer-aged faces , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[5]  A. Little,et al.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  I only have eyes for you: Ovulation redirects attention (but not memory) to attractive men. , 2010, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[7]  Sharon Sassler Partnering Across the Life Course: Sex, Relationships, and Mate Selection. , 2010, Journal of marriage and the family.

[8]  G. A. Mendelsohn,et al.  Partner preferences across the life span: online dating by older adults. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[9]  A. Little,et al.  Circum-menopausal effects on women's judgements of facial attractiveness , 2009, Biology Letters.

[10]  D. Ariely,et al.  If I'm Not Hot, are You Hot or Not? Physical Attractiveness Evaluations and Dating Preferences as a Function of Own Attractiveness , 2007 .

[11]  C. Teuscher,et al.  Reconsidering the double standard of aging: Effects of gender and sexual orientation on facial attractiveness ratings , 2007 .

[12]  I only have eyes for you... , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  A. Little,et al.  Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Gordon L. Patzer,et al.  The Power and Paradox of Physical Attractiveness , 2006 .

[15]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  John Sabini,et al.  Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: a review. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Attitudes Toward Younger and Older Adults: An Updated Meta‐Analytic Review , 2005 .

[18]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Sexually selective cognition: beauty captures the mind of the beholder. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  K. Grammer,et al.  Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[20]  T. Mussweiler Comparison processes in social judgment: mechanisms and consequences. , 2003, Psychological review.

[21]  M. Soules,et al.  Executive summary: Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW). , 2001, Fertility and sterility.

[22]  M. Soules,et al.  Executive summary: Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW) , 2001, Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society.

[23]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Beauty, Dominance, and the Mating Game: Contrast Effects in Self-Assessment Reflect Gender Differences in Mate Selection , 1999 .

[25]  E. Charnov,et al.  Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. , 1995 .

[27]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Evolution and Social Cognition: Contrast Effects as a Function of Sex, Dominance, and Physical Attractiveness , 1994 .

[28]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  P. Ellison Applications of biological anthropology to human affairs: Reproductive ecology and human fertility , 1991 .

[30]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[31]  Ronald Henss,et al.  Perceiving Age and Attractiveness in Facial Photographs1 , 1991 .

[32]  D. Buss,et al.  Derogation of Competitors , 1990 .

[33]  Douglas T. Kenrick,et al.  Influence of popular erotica on judgments of strangers and mates , 1989 .

[34]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  D. Buss The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  D. H. Wedell,et al.  A formal analysis of ratings of physical attractiveness: Successive contrast and simultaneous assimilation , 1987 .

[37]  C. Zalenski,et al.  Is There a Double Standard of Aging?1 , 1986 .

[38]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[39]  B. Keith Is there a double standard of aging? Sex effects in age stereotyping. , 1985 .

[40]  M. K. Moss,et al.  The Effect of Context on Ratings of Attractiveness of Photographs , 1975 .

[41]  Kk Dion What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  S. E. Williams,et al.  the Effect of , 2004 .

[44]  S. McKelvie,et al.  Effects of age and gender on perceived facial attractiveness. , 1993 .

[45]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem. , 1980 .

[46]  H. Helson,et al.  Adaptation-level theory , 1964 .