The impact of sound speed errors on medical ultrasound imaging.

The results of a quantitative study of the impact of sound speed errors on the spatial resolution and amplitude sensitivity of a commercial medical ultrasound scanner are presented in the context of their clinical significance. The beamforming parameters of the scanner were manipulated to produce sound speed errors ranging over +/-8% while imaging a wire target and an attenuating, speckle-generating phantom. For the wire target, these errors produced increases in lateral beam width of up to 320% and reductions in peak echo amplitude of up to 10.5 dB. In the speckle-generating phantom, these errors produced increases in speckle intensity correlation cell area of up to 92% and reductions in mean speckle brightness of up to 5.6 dB. These results are applied in statistical analyses of two detection tasks of clinical relevance. The first is of low contrast lesion detectability, predicting the changes in the correct decision probability as a function of lesion size, contrast, and sound speed error. The second is of point target detectability, predicting the changes in the correct decision probability as function of point target reflectivity and sound speed error. Representative results of these analyses are presented and their implications for clinical imaging are discussed. In general, sound speed errors have a more significant impact on point target detectability over lesion detectability by these analyses, producing up to a 22% reduction in correct decisions for a typical error.

[1]  Osamu Ikeda,et al.  Adaptive ultrasonic array imaging system through an inhomogeneous layer , 1982 .

[2]  T J Hall,et al.  Ultrasound contrast-detail analysis: a preliminary study in human observer performance. , 1993, Medical physics.

[3]  M E Anderson,et al.  The detection of breast microcalcifications with medical ultrasound. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J. Thijssen,et al.  Texture in tissue echograms. Speckle or information? , 1990, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  F. Dunn,et al.  Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Edward J. Wegman,et al.  Statistical Signal Processing , 1985 .

[7]  K. Takamizawa,et al.  An investigation of wavefront distortion correction: correction using averaged phase information and the effect of correction in one and two dimensions (medical US imaging) , 1991, IEEE 1991 Ultrasonics Symposium,.

[8]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[9]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Adaptive Aberration Correction of Abdominal Images Using PARCA , 1997, Ultrasonic imaging.

[10]  F. Dunn,et al.  Compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. II. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Properties of Acoustical Speckle in the Presence of Phase Aberration Part II: Correlation Lengths , 1988, Ultrasonic imaging.

[12]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[13]  D Rachlin Direct estimation of aberrating delays in pulse-echo imaging systems. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  G. Carter,et al.  The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay , 1976 .

[15]  G E Trahey,et al.  A Quantitative Approach to Speckle Reduction via Frequency Compounding , 1986, Ultrasonic imaging.

[16]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Fundamental correlation lengths of coherent speckle in medical ultrasonic images , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  George S. K. Wong,et al.  Speed of sound in pure water as a function of temperature , 1993 .

[18]  J F Greenleaf,et al.  Biomedical ultrasound beam forming. , 1994, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  S. W. Smith,et al.  Phase aberration correction in medical ultrasound using speckle brightness as a quality factor. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[21]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[22]  W. Walker,et al.  A speckle target adaptive imaging technique in the presence of distributed aberrations , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  J. Goodman Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns , 1963 .

[24]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Visual detection efficiency in ultrasonic imaging: A framework for objective assessment of image quality , 1994 .

[25]  R C Waag,et al.  Time-shift compensation of ultrasonic pulse focus degradation using least-mean-square error estimates of arrival time. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  G Kossoff,et al.  Velocity compensation in water-coupled breast echography. , 1973, Ultrasonics.

[27]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Phase-aberration correction using signals from point reflectors and diffuse scatterers: basic principles , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[28]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Ultrasonic nonlinear parameters and sound speed of alcohol-water mixtures. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  G E Trahey,et al.  The direct estimation of sound speed using pulse-echo ultrasound. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[31]  C F Chen,et al.  Pulse-echo ultrasound speed measurements: progress and prospects. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.