Triple negative breast cancer subtypes and pathologic complete response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with distinct molecular subtypes that differentially respond to chemotherapy and targeted agents. The purpose of this study is to explore the clinical relevance of Lehmann TNBC subtypes by identifying any differences in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among them. We determined Lehmann subtypes by gene expression profiling in paraffined pre-treatment tumor biopsies from 125 TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracyclines and/or taxanes +/- carboplatin. We explored the clinicopathological characteristics of Lehmann subtypes and their association with the pathologic complete response (pCR) to different treatments. The global pCR rate was 37%, and it was unevenly distributed within Lehmann’s subtypes. Basal-like 1 (BL1) tumors exhibited the highest pCR to carboplatin containing regimens (80% vs 23%, p=0.027) and were the most proliferative (Ki-67>50% of 88.2% vs. 63.7%, p=0.02). Luminal-androgen receptor (LAR) patients achieved the lowest pCR to all treatments (14.3% vs 42.7%, p=0.045 when excluding mesenchymal stem-like (MSL) samples) and were the group with the lowest proliferation (Ki-67≤50% of 71% vs 27%, p=0.002). In our cohort, only tumors with LAR phenotype presented non-basal-like intrinsic subtypes (HER2-enriched and luminal A). TNBC patients present tumors with a high genetic diversity ranging from highly proliferative tumors, likely responsive to platinum-based therapies, to a subset of chemoresistant tumors with low proliferation and luminal characteristics.

[1]  Gideon Blumenthal,et al.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[2]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version). , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[3]  J. Albanell,et al.  A randomized phase II trial of platinum salts in basal-like breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting. Results from the GEICAM/2006-03, multicenter study , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[4]  Gordon B Mills,et al.  Comprehensive Genomic Analysis Identifies Novel Subtypes and Targets of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  A. Gown,et al.  Immunohistochemical and Clinical Characterization of the Basal-Like Subtype of Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Identification of Prognosis-Relevant Subgroups in Patients with Chemoresistant Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[8]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Debra L Winkeljohn Triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[10]  Xi Chen,et al.  TNBCtype: A Subtyping Tool for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2012, Cancer informatics.

[11]  Harold L. Moses,et al.  Refinement of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Selection , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  Paul E Swanson,et al.  Androgen receptor expression in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Immunohistochemical, clinical, and prognostic associations. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[13]  F. Bertucci,et al.  A refined molecular taxonomy of breast cancer , 2011, Oncogene.

[14]  F. Rojo,et al.  High Proliferation Predicts Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer , 2016, The oncologist.

[15]  J. Pietenpol,et al.  Identification and use of biomarkers in treatment strategies for triple‐negative breast cancer subtypes , 2014, The Journal of pathology.

[16]  J. Grenier,et al.  A phase II trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with triple-negative androgen receptor positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (UCBG 12-1). , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  Frédérique Penault-Llorca,et al.  Can pathologic complete response (pCR) be used as a surrogate marker of survival after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer? , 2015, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[18]  K. Hess,et al.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Xin Hu,et al.  Comprehensive transcriptome analysis identifies novel molecular subtypes and subtype-specific RNAs of triple-negative breast cancer , 2016, Breast Cancer Research.

[20]  S. Loibl,et al.  Lessons from the neoadjuvant setting on how best to choose adjuvant therapies. , 2011, Breast.

[21]  Funda Meric-Bernstam,et al.  Differential Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Among 7 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  M. Rezai,et al.  Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  E Mardis,et al.  Predicting response and survival in chemotherapy-treated triple-negative breast cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[25]  A. Nobel,et al.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  C. Perou,et al.  The Triple Negative Paradox: Primary Tumor Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[27]  S. Narod,et al.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[29]  Carsten Denkert,et al.  Androgen receptor expression in primary breast cancer and its predictive and prognostic value in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[30]  Charles M. Perou,et al.  Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer , 2010, Molecular oncology.

[31]  Ian O Ellis,et al.  Prognostic markers in triple‐negative breast cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[32]  Charles M. Perou,et al.  Response and survival of breast cancer intrinsic subtypes following multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[33]  X. Chen,et al.  Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. , 2011, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[34]  D. Berry,et al.  Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Unravelling triple-negative breast cancer molecular heterogeneity using an integrative multiomic analysis , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[36]  A. Hutcheon,et al.  A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. , 2003, Breast.

[37]  C. Hudis,et al.  Results from a phase 2 study of enzalutamide (ENZA), an androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor, in advanced AR+ triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). , 2015 .