Impact of increasing deployment of artificial floating objects on the spatial distribution of social fish species

Summary: Approximately 300 pelagic fish species naturally aggregate around floating objects (FOBs) at the surface of the oceans. Currently, more than 50% of the world catch of tropical tuna comes from the industrial tuna fisheries around drifting FOBs. Greater understanding of the complex decision-making processes leading to this aggregation pattern and the impact of the massive release of artificial FOBs by fishermen on the spatial distribution and management of tuna is needed. We analyse how the interplay between social (relationships between individuals) and non-social (responses to the environment) behaviours may affect the spatial distribution of a population in a multi-FOB environment. Taking the example of tropical tunas associating with FOBs and using differential equations and stochastic simulations, we examine how, when increasing the number of FOBs, fish aggregation dynamics and the distribution of the population among patches are affected by the population size, level of sociality and the natural retentive and/or attractive forces of FOBs on individual tuna. Our model predicts that, depending on the species' level of sociality, fish will be scattered among FOBs or aggregated around a single FOB based on the number of FOBs deployed in a homogeneous oceanic region. For social species, we demonstrated that the total fish catch is reduced with increasing FOBs number. Indeed, for each size of population, there are a number of FOBs minimizing the total population of fish associated with FOBs and another number of FOBs maximizing the total population of associated fish. Synthesis and applications. In terms of fisheries management, the total catch volume is directly linked to the total number of floating objects (FOBs) for non-social species, and any limit on the number of sets would then result in a limit on the total catch. For social species (e.g. tuna), however, increasing the number of FOBs does not necessarily lead to an increase in the total catch, which is a non-intuitive result. Indeed, our model shows that, for specific values of the parameters, deploying a greater number of FOBs in the water (all other parameters being constant) does not necessarily help fishermen to catch more tuna, but does increase the level of fishing effort and bycatch. In terms of fisheries management, the total catch volume is directly linked to the total number of floating objects (FOBs) for non-social species, and any limit on the number of sets would then result in a limit on the total catch. For social species (e.g. tuna), however, increasing the number of FOBs does not necessarily lead to an increase in the total catch, which is a non-intuitive result. Indeed, our model shows that, for specific values of the parameters, deploying a greater number of FOBs in the water (all other parameters being constant) does not necessarily help fishermen to catch more tuna, but does increase the level of fishing effort and bycatch. © 2013 British Ecological Society.

[1]  Victor Restrepo,et al.  Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? , 2013 .

[2]  L. Dagorn,et al.  How much do fish aggregating devices (FADs) modify the floating object environment in the ocean , 2013 .

[3]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Does social behavior influence the dynamics of aggregations formed by tropical tunas around floating objects ? An experimental approach , 2013 .

[4]  WilliamsPeter,et al.  Targeting bigger schools can reduce ecosystem impacts of fisheries , 2012 .

[5]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Quantifying the Interplay between Environmental and Social Effects on Aggregated-Fish Dynamics , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  E. Gilman Bycatch governance and best practice mitigation technology in global tuna fisheries , 2011 .

[7]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Individual Preferences and Social Interactions Determine the Aggregation of Woodlice , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  Emmanuel Chassot,et al.  Bycatch of the European purse seine tuna fishery in the Atlantic Ocean for the 2003-2007 period , 2010 .

[9]  D. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[10]  S. Pioch,et al.  Optimal number of sites in artificial pelagic multisite fisheries , 2010 .

[11]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Personality and collective decision-making in foraging herbivores , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  L. Dagorn,et al.  First field-based experiment supporting the meeting point hypothesis for schooling in pelagic fish , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Complex dynamics based on a quorum: decision-making process by cockroaches in a patchy environment. , 2009 .

[14]  I. Couzin Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  M. Mangel,et al.  AGGREGATION AND FISHERY DYNAMICS : A THEORETICAL STUDY OF SCHOOLING AND THE PURSE SEINE TUNA FISHERIES l , 2009 .

[16]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-Organized Shape and Frontal Density of Fish Schools , 2008 .

[17]  F Mondada,et al.  Social Integration of Robots into Groups of Cockroaches to Control Self-Organized Choices , 2007, Science.

[18]  David Itano,et al.  Fish behaviour from fishers' knowledge: the case study of tropical tuna around drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs) , 2007 .

[19]  David Itano,et al.  Characterizing fish communities associated with drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Western Indian Ocean using underwater visual surveys , 2007 .

[20]  C. Detrain,et al.  Spatial organization in a dimorphic ant: caste specificity of clustering patterns and area marking , 2006 .

[21]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  The blind leading the blind in army ant raid patterns: Testing a model of self-organization (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1991, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[22]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  The blind leading the blind: Modeling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns , 1989, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[23]  E. K. Pikitch,et al.  Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management , 2004, Science.

[24]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  Individual behavior and emergent properties of fish schools: a comparison of observation and theory , 2004 .

[25]  J. Godin,et al.  Context-dependent group size choice in fish , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Review of fish associative behaviour: Toward a generalisation of the meeting point hypothesis , 2000, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[27]  U. Maschwitz,et al.  Foraging strategies and recruitment behaviour in the European harvester ant Messor rufitarsis (F.) , 1985, Oecologia.

[28]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Modulation of individual behavior and collective decision-making during aggregation site selection by the ant Messor barbarus , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[29]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[30]  J. Sibert,et al.  Mobility of tropical tunas and the implications for fisheries management , 2003 .

[31]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[32]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Sustainable exploitation of social species: a test and comparison of models , 2002 .

[33]  E. Romanov Bycatch in the tuna purse-seine fisheries of the western Indian Ocean , 2002 .

[34]  L. Dagorn,et al.  Modeling tuna behaviour near floating objects: from individuals to aggregations , 2000 .

[35]  F. Ménard,et al.  Food consumption of tuna in the Equatorial Atlantic ocean: FAD-associated versus unassociated schools , 2000 .

[36]  E. Josse,et al.  Movement patterns of large bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the open ocean, determined using ultrasonic telemetry , 2000 .

[37]  Alain Fonteneau,et al.  A worldwide review of purse seine fisheries on FADs , 2000 .

[38]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Emerging patterns and food recruitment in ants: an analytical study , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[40]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Tropical tuna associated with floating objects: a simulation study of the meeting point hypothesis , 1999 .

[41]  J. Hutchinson Animal groups in three dimensions , 1999 .

[42]  P. Lehodey,et al.  A spatial population dynamics simulation model of tropical tunas using a habitat index based on environmental parameters , 1998 .

[43]  P. Lehodey,et al.  El Niño Southern Oscillation and tuna in the western Pacific , 1997, Nature.

[44]  N. Gotelli,et al.  A general model of metapopulation dynamics , 1993 .

[45]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Tuna Purse-Seine Fishing with Fish-Aggregating Devices (FAD): Models of Tuna FAD Interactions , 1989 .

[46]  Kenneth S. Norris,et al.  Cooperative societies in three- dimensional space: On the origins of aggregations, flocks, and schools, with special reference to dolphins and fish , 1988 .

[47]  T. Pitcher Behaviour of Teleost Fishes , 1986 .

[48]  Shumpei Kojima Fishing for Dolphins in the Western Part of the Japan Sea-II , 1960 .

[49]  G. Fraenkel,et al.  The Orientation of Animals, Kineses, Taxes and Compass Reactions, , 1941 .

[50]  G. Fraenkel Orientation of Animals , 1940 .

[51]  M. Uda Distribution of Drifting Bodies in the Ocean Current , 1936 .

[52]  T. Worsley,et al.  FOOD-CONSUMPTION. , 2019, Science.