Determining the relationship between cervical lordosis and neck complaints.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the presence of a "functionally normal" cervical lordosis and identify if this and the amount of forward head posture are related to neck complaints. METHODS Using the posterior tangent method, an angle of cervical lordosis was measured from C2 through C7 vertebrae on 277 lateral cervical x-rays. Anterior weight bearing was measured as the horizontal distance of the posterior superior body of the C2 vertebra compared to a vertical line drawn superiorly from the posterior inferior body of the C7 vertebra. The measurements were sorted into 2 groups, cervical complaint and noncervical complaint groups. The data were then partitioned into age by decades, sex, and angle categories. RESULTS Patients with lordosis of 20 degrees or less were more likely to have cervicogenic symptoms (P < .001). The association between cervical pain and lordosis of 0 degrees or less was significant (P < .0001). The odds that a patient with cervical pain had a lordosis of 0 degrees or less was 18 times greater than for a patient with a noncervical complaint. Patients with cervical pain had less lordosis and this was consistent over all age ranges. Males had larger median cervical lordosis than females (20 degrees vs 14 degrees) (2-sided Mann-Whitney U test, P = .016). When partitioned by age grouping, this trend is significant only in the 40- to 49-year-old range (2-sided Mann-Whitney U test, P < .01). CONCLUSION We found a statistically significant association between cervical pain and lordosis < 20 degrees and a "clinically normal" range for cervical lordosis of 31 degrees to 40 degrees. Maintenance of a lordosis in the range of 31 degrees to 40 degrees could be a clinical goal for chiropractic treatment.

[1]  D. Gore Roentgenographic Findings in the Cervical Spine in Asymptomatic Persons: A Ten-Year Follow-up , 2001, Spine.

[2]  Charschan Wd,et al.  The curve of the cervical spine: variations and significance. , 1994 .

[3]  C. S. Masarsky,et al.  Somatovisceral aspects of chiropractic : an evidence-based approach , 2001 .

[4]  L. Penning,et al.  Kinematics of cervical spine injury , 1995, European Spine Journal.

[5]  J. W. Hardacker,et al.  Radiographic Standing Cervical Segmental Alignment in Adult Volunteers Without Neck Symptoms , 1997, Spine.

[6]  Akira Takahashi,et al.  Roentgenographic Findings of the Cervical Spine in Tension‐Type Headache , 1993, Headache.

[7]  Burt Holland,et al.  Increasing the cervical lordosis with chiropractic biophysics seated combined extension-compression and transverse load cervical traction with cervical manipulation: nonrandomized clinical control trial. , 2003, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[8]  Tadeusz J. Janik,et al.  Cobb Method or Harrison Posterior Tangent Method: Which to Choose for Lateral Cervical Radiographic Analysis , 2000, Spine.

[9]  S. Sepic,et al.  Roentgenographic Findings of the Cervical Spine in Asymptomatic People , 1986, Spine.

[10]  H. Vernon,et al.  Cervicogenic dysfunction in muscle contraction headache and migraine: a descriptive study. , 1992, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[11]  Tadeusz J. Janik,et al.  Comparisons of Lordotic Cervical Spine Curvatures to a Theoretical Ideal Model of the Static Sagittal Cervical Spine , 1996, Spine.

[12]  Ken Yong-Hing,et al.  Apophysial Joint Degeneration, Disc Degeneration, and Sagittal Curve of the Cervical Spine: Can They Be Measured Reliably on Radiographs? , 1997, Spine.

[13]  Lindsay J. Rowe,et al.  The essentials of skeletal radiology , 1987 .

[14]  Tadeusz J. Janik,et al.  Evaluation of axial and flexural stresses in the vertebral body cortex and trabecular bone in lordosis and two sagittal cervical translation configurations with an elliptical shell model. , 2002, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[15]  Bost Hc The curve of the cervical spine: variations and significance. , 1995 .

[16]  Tadeusz J. Janik,et al.  Repeatability over time of posture, radiograph positioning, and radiograph line drawing: an analysis of six control groups. , 2003, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[17]  P. Tuchin,et al.  CORRELATION OF CERVICAL LORDOSIS MEASUREMENT WITH INCIDENCE OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS , 1996, Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia.

[18]  M. Haas,et al.  Chiropractic radiologists: a survey of chiropractors' attitudes and patterns of use. , 1997, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[19]  N. Markowitz,et al.  A ten-year follow-up , 1979 .

[20]  C. Hawk,et al.  Chiropractic radiologists: a survey of demographics, abilities, educational attitudes and practice trends. , 1998, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[21]  R. Cailliet,et al.  A new 3-point bending traction method for restoring cervical lordosis and cervical manipulation: a nonrandomized clinical controlled trial. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  Braaf Mm,et al.  Trauma of cervical spine as cause of chronic headache. , 1975 .