A model of the vertical apparent mass and the fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass of the human body during vertical whole-body vibration

The apparent mass of the human body reflects gross movements caused by whole-body vibration and can be used to predict the influence of body dynamics on seat transmissibility. With vertical excitation, various models fit the measured vertical apparent mass of the human body, but experiments also show high fore-and-aft forces on the seat (the fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass) that have not influenced current models. This paper defines a model that predicts the vertical apparent mass and the fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass of the seated human body during vertical excitation. A three degree-of-freedom model with vertical, fore-and-aft and rotational (i.e. pitch) degrees of freedom has been developed with twelve model parameters (representing inertia, stiffness, damping, and geometry) optimised to the measured vertical apparent mass and the measured fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass of the body. The model provides close fits to the moduli and phases for both median data and the responses of 12 individual subjects. The optimum model parameters found by fitting to the median apparent mass of 12 subjects were similar to the medians of the same parameters found by fitting to the individual apparent masses of the same 12 subjects. The model suggests the seated human body undergoes fore-and-aft motion on a seat when exposed to vertical excitation, with the primary resonance frequency of the apparent mass arising from vertical motion of the body. According to the model, changes in the vertical, fore-and-aft, or rotational degree of freedom have an effect on the resonance in the fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass.

[1]  M. Griffin,et al.  A MODAL ANALYSIS OF WHOLE-BODY VERTICAL VIBRATION, USING A FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1997 .

[2]  R Muksian On frequency-dependent damping coefficients in lumped-parameter models of human beings. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  L. Wei,et al.  THE PREDICITON OF SEAT TRANSMISSIBILITY FROM MEASURES OF SEAT IMPEDANCE , 1998 .

[4]  M Fritz,et al.  Description of the relation between the forces acting in the lumbar spine and whole-body vibrations by means of transfer functions. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Horst Peter Wölfel,et al.  Modal description—A better way of characterizing human vibration behavior , 2006 .

[6]  N J Mansfield,et al.  Models of the apparent mass of the seated human body exposed to horizontal whole-body vibration. , 1999, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Effect of seat surface angle on forces at the seat surface during whole-body vertical vibration , 2005 .

[8]  C F Abrams,et al.  Application of a damped spring-mass human vibration simulator in vibration testing of vehicle seats. , 1969, Ergonomics.

[9]  Katsutoshi Ohdo,et al.  Dynamic and subjective responses of seated subjects exposed to simultaneous vertical and fore-and-aft whole-body vibration: The effect of the phase between the two single-axis components , 2006 .

[10]  Yong-San Yoon,et al.  Biomechanical model of human on seat with backrest for evaluating ride quality , 2001 .

[11]  M J Griffin,et al.  The apparent mass of the seated human body: vertical vibration. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Peter Múčka,et al.  Preliminary results on an x-direction apparent mass model of human body sitting in a cushioned, suspended seat , 2006 .

[13]  Horst Peter Wölfel,et al.  Apparent mass of seated men : determination with single- and multi-axis excitations at different magnitudes , 2006 .

[14]  N. Mansfield,et al.  The apparent mass of the seated human exposed to single-axis and multi-axis whole-body vibration. , 2007, Journal of Biomechanics.

[15]  N J Mansfield,et al.  Effect of vibration magnitude, vibration spectrum and muscle tension on apparent mass and cross axis transfer functions during whole-body vibration exposure. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  M. Griffin,et al.  MOVEMENT OF THE UPPER-BODY OF SEATED SUBJECTS EXPOSED TO VERTICAL WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION AT THE PRINCIPAL RESONANCE FREQUENCY , 1998 .

[17]  M J Griffin,et al.  Modelling the dynamic mechanisms associated with the principal resonance of the seated human body. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  Whole-body vertical biodynamic response characteristics of the seated vehicle driver: measurement and model development , 1998 .

[19]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  EFFECT OF MAGNITUDE OF VERTICAL WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION ON ABSORBED POWER FOR THE SEATED HUMAN BODY , 1998 .

[20]  H Broman,et al.  A mathematical model of the impact response of the seated subject. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[21]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Non-linear dual-axis biodynamic response to vertical whole-body vibration , 2003 .

[22]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Mathematical models for the apparent masses of standing subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration , 2003 .

[23]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Tri-axial forces at the seat and backrest during whole-body vertical vibration , 2004 .