UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Two crates of beer and 40 pizzas: the adoption of innovative political behavioural targeting techniques

Political campaigns increasingly use data to (micro)target voters with tailored messages. In doing so, campaigns raise concerns about privacy and the quality of the public discourse. Extending existing research to a European context, we propose and test a model for understanding how different contextual factors hinder or facilitate data-driven capabilities of campaigns. We applied the model during the 2017 national election campaign in the Netherlands. The results show how data-driven targeting techniques are not only useful in a first-past-the-post system, but also in a proportional representation system, which at first sight seems to be less suitable for such techniques.

[1]  Cristian Vaccari,et al.  From echo chamber to persuasive device? Rethinking the role of the Internet in campaigns , 2013, New Media Soc..

[2]  Rikke Frank Joergensen.  The unbearable lightness of user consent , 2014 .

[3]  M. Calo.  Against Notice Skepticism In Privacy (And Elsewhere) , 2011 .

[4]  I. Rubinstein.  Voter Privacy in the Age of Big Data , 2014 .

[5]  Daniel Kreiss.  Taking Our Country Back: The Crafting of Networked Politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama , 2012 .

[6]  I. Indridason,et al.  Making Candidates Count: The Logic of Electoral Alliances in Two-Round Legislative Elections , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[7]  Maurice Vergeer,et al.  Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning , 2013 .

[8]  Nick Anstead,et al.  Data-driven campaigning in the 2015 UK general election , 2017 .

[9]  Eitan Hersh.  Hacking the Electorate: How Campaigns Perceive Voters , 2015 .

[10]  R. Gibson,et al.  Party change, social media and the rise of ‘citizen-initiated’ campaigning , 2015 .

[11]  Solon Barocas,et al.  The price of precision: voter microtargeting and its potential harms to the democratic process , 2012, PLEAD '12.

[12]  H. Boeije.  Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek : denken en doen , 2005 .

[13]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[14]  Frederik J. Zuiderveen Borgesius,et al.  Singling out people without knowing their names - Behavioural targeting, pseudonymous data, and the new Data Protection Regulation , 2016, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[15]  Scott Wright,et al.  Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation , 2012, New Media Soc..

[16]  Kasper M. Hansen,et al.  Political hypocrisy: The effect of political scandals on candidate evaluations , 2013 .

[17]  J. Turow.  The Daily You , 2017 .

[18]  Andy Williamson,et al.  Chasing the Digital Wave: International Perspectives on the Growth of Online Campaigning , 2014 .

[19]  James N. Danziger,et al.  The Internet electorate , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[20]  S. Schneider.  NEW MEDIA CAMPAIGNS AND THE MANAGED CITIZEN , 2007 .

[21]  Di Wang,et al.  The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary , 2015, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[22]  Eva Johanna Schweitzer.  Normalization 2.0: A longitudinal analysis of German online campaigns in the national elections 2002–9 , 2011 .

[23]  Kim Strandberg,et al.  Online Electoral Competition in Different Settings , 2008 .

[24]  Bruce Bimber and Richard Davis.  Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections , 2003 .

[25]  D. Karpf.  SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH METHODS IN INTERNET TIME , 2012 .

[26]  John E. Calfee,et al.  Some Effects of Uncertainty on Compliance with Legal Standards , 1984 .

[27]  William Gorton,et al.  Manipulating Citizens: How Political Campaigns’ Use of Behavioral Social Science Harms Democracy , 2016 .

[28]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  Prototype politics: technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy , 2018 .

[29]  Andreas Jungherr.  The Role of the Internet in Political Campaigns in Germany , 2015 .

[30]  Brian F. Schaffner,et al.  Targeted Campaign Appeals and the Value of Ambiguity , 2013 .

[31]  R. Gibson,et al.  Normalising or Equalising Party Competition? Assessing the Impact of the Web on Election Campaigning , 2015 .

[32]  Michael Margolis.  Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[33]  Kenneth D. Plowman,et al.  Reaching Publics on the Web During the 1996 Presidential Campaign , 1999 .

[34]  J. Blumler,et al.  The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features , 1999 .

[35]  Colin J. Bennett.  Voter databases, micro-targeting, and data protection law: can political parties campaign in Europe as they do in North America? , 2016 .

[36]  S. Birch.  Two-Round Electoral Systems and Democracy , 2003 .

[37]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  Digital Media in the Obama Campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the Personalized Political Communication Environment , 2014 .

[38]  John R. Petrocik.  Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study , 1996 .

[39]  K. Lipsitz.  Democratic Theory and Political Campaigns , 2004 .

[40]  R. Gibson,et al.  Do Online Election Campaigns Win Votes? The 2007 Australian “YouTube” Election , 2011 .

[41]  Ching-Hsing Wang.  The effects of party fractionalization and party polarization on democracy , 2014 .

[42]  James Stanyer,et al.  Political Parties, the Internet and the 2005 General Election: From Web Presence to E-Campaigning? , 2005 .

[43]  P. Herrnson.  The Roles of Party Organizations, Party-Connected Committees, and Party Allies in Elections , 2009, The Journal of Politics.

[44]  M. Duverger.  Political Parties Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State , 1964 .

[45]  Balazs Vedres,et al.  Game Changer: The Topology of Creativity1 , 2015, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  Kasper M. Hansen,et al.  Cyber-Campaigning in Denmark: Application and Effects of Candidate Campaigning , 2014 .

[47]  K. Jamieson.  Messages, Micro-targeting, and New Media Technologies , 2013 .

[48]  Mary F. E. Ebeling.  Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns , 2013 .

[49]  Omer Tene,et al.  Privacy: The New Generations , 2011 .

[50]  Mira Sotirovic,et al.  A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies , 2001 .

[51]  H. Semetko.  Global Political Campaigning: A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices. By Fritz Plasser with Gunda Plasser. New York: Praeger, 2002. 424p. $64.95 , 2003, Perspectives on Politics.

[52]  Vincent Campbell,et al.  Looking Out or Turning in? Organizational Ramifications of Online Political Posters on Facebook , 2016 .

[53]  Colin J. Bennett.  Trends in Voter Surveillance in Western Societies: Privacy Intrusions and Democratic Implications , 2015 .

[54]  F. Wester,et al.  Strategieën voor kwalitatief onderzoek , 1987 .

[55]  Timothy J. Muris,et al.  Choice or Consequences: Protecting Privacy in Commercial Information , 2008 .

[56]  Andreas Jungherr.  Four Functions of Digital Tools in Election Campaigns , 2016 .

[57]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace `Revolution′ , 2000 .

[58]  Arend Lijphart.  Patterns of democracy : government forms and performance in thirty-six countries , 2000 .

[59]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Major parties dominate, minor parties struggle : US elections and the Internet , 2003 .

[60]  Alex Raskolnikov.  Probabilistic Compliance , 2016 .

[61]  Rune Karlsen,et al.  Does new media technology drive election campaign change? , 2010, Inf. Polity.