OBJECTIFYING DISCOMFORT SEAT MEASUREMENT FOR NEXT GENERATION TRUCK DRIVER'S SEAT

Comfort is an attribute that today’s drivers demand more and more. Seat is one of the important features of vehicle and there is the place where the professional driver spends most of their time. According to ‘European Union Legislation for Drivers and Promote’, the weekly driving time for truck drivers shall not exceed 56 hours. Assuming eight week vacation and one more for holiday, the truck driver is spending around 2408 hours driving time per year. Truck seat, which are in contact with truck occupants, play an important role in improving the comfort and work environment of a driver. The perceived comfort of humans in a given environment can be classified as a subjective assessment, because it is possible to find a considerable variation in responses of different people to the same situation. Nevertheless, the factors on which the opinions of people on (dis)comfort level are physical variables such as pressure, temperature and heart rate. The main research objective is to investigate "How to improve the truck seat comfort objectively?" The paper describes the state-of-the-art objective measurement techniques in seat development and an intelligent system is proposed for the next generation truck driver’s seat.

[1]  Wenqi Shen,et al.  Validity and reliability of rating scales for seated pressure discomfort , 1997 .

[2]  W. F. Floyd,et al.  ANATOMICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES IN CHAIR AND TABLE DESIGN , 1958 .

[3]  Christopher M. Boggs,et al.  Field Study to Evaluate Driver Fatigue on Air-Inflated Truck Seat Cushions , 2007 .

[4]  William J. Pielemeier,et al.  The use of seat effective amplitude transmissibility (SEAT) values to predict dynamic seat comfort , 2003 .

[5]  D E Gyi,et al.  Seat pressure measurement technologies: considerations for their evaluation. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  M G Helander,et al.  Field studies of comfort and discomfort in sitting. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[7]  D E Gyi,et al.  Interface pressure and the prediction of car seat discomfort. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  Alicia Vértiz,et al.  Redefining Seat Comfort , 1997 .

[9]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Effect of seat surface angle on forces at the seat surface during whole-body vertical vibration , 2005 .

[10]  M. de Looze,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Ergonomics Sitting Comfort and Discomfort and the Relationships with Objective Measures Sitting Comfort and Discomfort and the Relationships with Objective Measures , 2022 .

[11]  Jacques Duchêne,et al.  Evaluation of driver discomfort during long-duration car driving. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Giuseppe Andreoni,et al.  Method for the analysis of posture and interface pressure of car drivers. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  Mehdi Ahmadian,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Air-inflated and Foam Seat Cushions for Truck Seats , 2002 .

[14]  H. T. E. Hertzberg,et al.  The Human Buttocks in Sitting: Pressures, Patterns, and Palliatives , 1972 .

[15]  M J Griffin,et al.  Factors affecting static seat cushion comfort , 2001, Ergonomics.

[16]  Kuntal Thakurta,et al.  Evaluating Short and Long Term Seating Comfort , 1995 .

[17]  Virendra Tewari,et al.  Seating discomfort for tractor operators – a critical review , 2000 .

[18]  K C Parsons,et al.  An ergonomics investigation into human thermal comfort using an automobile seat heated with encapsulated carbonized fabric (ECF). , 1999, Ergonomics.

[19]  T D Gillespie,et al.  HEAVY TRUCK RIDE , 1985 .

[20]  Mike Kolich,et al.  A conceptual framework proposed to formalize the scientific investigation of automobile seat comfort. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Identifying Factors of Comfort and Discomfort in Sitting , 1996, Hum. Factors.