Improved Dead Zone Modification for Robust Adaptive Control of Uncertain Linear Systems Described by Input-Output Models With Actuator Faults

This article considers an improvement in dead zone modification scheme for robust model-reference adaptive control of SISO and TITO systems, described by input-output uncertain linear models with actuator faults. In the conventional approach, adaptation of the controller parameters is ceased in the dead zone, which leads to steady state tracking error. This problem is resolved by tuning specific controller parameters inside the dead zone. The stability of the closed loop system and tracking of step commands are verified analytically. A comparative numerical simulation is performed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme in control of an engine-dynamometer system.

[1]  Guang-Hong Yang,et al.  Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Tracking Control Against Actuator Faults With Application to Flight Control , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[2]  Xinmin Wang,et al.  Guaranteed Cost Control for Singularly Perturbed Uncertain Systems , 2006, Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications.

[3]  Nguyen Huu Du,et al.  Implicit-system approach to the robust stability for a class of singularly perturbed linear systems , 2005, Syst. Control. Lett..

[4]  Per-Olof Gutman,et al.  Adaptive output-feedback tracking: The case of MIMO plants with unknown, time-varying state delay , 2009, Syst. Control. Lett..

[5]  Hansheng Wu,et al.  Adaptive robust tracking and model following of uncertain dynamical systems with multiple time delays , 2004, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[6]  Xiaoli Ma,et al.  Adaptive state feedback and tracking control of systems with actuator failures , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[7]  Z. H. Shao Robust stability of two-time-scale systems with nonlinear uncertainties , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Daniel W. C. Ho,et al.  Generalized quadratic stability for continuous-time singular systems with nonlinear perturbation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  Shin-Ju Chen,et al.  Robustness analysis of uncertain linear singular systems with output feedback control , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[10]  C. Fang,et al.  Analysis of stability robustness for generalized state-space systems with structured perturbations , 1993 .

[11]  Desineni S Naidu,et al.  Singular perturbations and time scales in control theory and applications: An overview , 2002 .

[12]  Marcel Staroswiecki,et al.  Fault Accommodation for Nonlinear Dynamic Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Riccardo Marino,et al.  Robust adaptive regulation of linear time-varying systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[14]  Liu Hsu,et al.  Lyapunov-based adaptive control of MIMO systems , 2003, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[15]  Matthew A. Franchek,et al.  Robust multivariable control of an engine-dynamometer system , 1994, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[16]  Roya Amjadifard,et al.  ROBUST DISTURBANCE ATTENUATION OF A CLASS OF NONLINEAR SINGULARLY PERTURBED SYSTEMS , 2010 .

[17]  Hansheng Wu Adaptive robust tracking and model following of uncertain dynamical systems with multiple time delays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[18]  Guang-Hong Yang,et al.  Reliable $H_{\infty}$ Control of Linear Systems With Adaptive Mechanism , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[19]  Shengyuan Xu,et al.  Robust stability and stabilization for singular systems with state delay and parameter uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[20]  Akhilanand Pati Tiwari,et al.  Output Feedback Control Design , 2013 .

[21]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Robust Adaptive Control , 2012 .