Comparing the habituation of late auditory evoked potentials to loud and soft sound

The objective fitting of hearing aids and cochlear implants remains a challenge. In particular, the determination of whether sound is perceived as too loud or comfortable represents an unsolved problem in noncooperative patients. In a first step of an ongoing study, we assess the feasibility of habituation correlates in late auditory evoked potentials (LAEPs) to discriminate between a soft sound (SS) of 50 dB SPL and a loud sound (LS) of 100 dB SPL. We applied a new sweep-to-sweep time-scale coherence measure to analyse the habituation in LAEPs, i.e., relative changes within sweep sequences. From the comparison between both stimulation levels, a total discrimination of responses to SS and LS in the individual normal hearing subject was possible. As just relative changes in SS and LS sweep sequences were considered, purely exogenously driven morphological alternations in the responses such as intensity related amplitude and latency changes were excluded from the analysis. It is concluded that the proposed method allows for the reliable detection of auditory habituation and differentiation of SS from LS. The proposed scheme might provide an electrophysiological measurement and signal processing framework for the objective detection of the most comfortable loudness level and can be used in further, more clinically oriented studies.

[1]  C. Rennie,et al.  Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  Guido F. Smoorenburg,et al.  Speech Perception in Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant Users with Processor Settings Based on Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Thresholds , 2002, Audiology and Neurotology.

[3]  C. Trenado,et al.  An integrative multiscale modeling approach for the study of tinnitus decompensation neural correlates , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human Brain , 1973, Science.

[5]  C. Elger,et al.  Habituation of auditory evoked potentials in intracranial and extracranial recordings. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Jelena Kovacevic,et al.  Wavelets and Subband Coding , 2013, Prentice Hall Signal Processing Series.

[7]  P. Falkai,et al.  Objective Quantification of the Tinnitus Decompensation by Synchronization Measures of Auditory Evoked Single Sweeps , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Timm Rosburg,et al.  Mid-latency auditory-evoked responses and sensory gating in focal epilepsy: a preliminary exploration. , 2006, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[9]  A. Bruns.  Fourier-, Hilbert- and wavelet-based signal analysis: are they really different approaches? , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  Andreas Rieder,et al.  Wavelets: Theory and Applications , 1997 .

[11]  L. Olgun,et al.  Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold. , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  C. Trenado,et al.  Corticothalamic Feedback Dynamics for Neural Correlates of Auditory Selective Attention , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  Juliana Yordanova,et al.  Analysis of phase-locking is informative for studying event-related EEG activity , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[15]  J. Bohorquez,et al.  Intraoperative monitoring of hearing during cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery using transtympanic electrocochleography. , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[16]  H. Fruhstorfer,et al.  Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  Tomas Sauer,et al.  Conventional and wavelet coherence applied to sensory-evoked electrical brain activity , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  W. Ritter,et al.  Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short term changes in average evoked responses. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  N. Dolu,et al.  Habituation of the Auditory Evoked Potential in a Short Interstimulus Interval Paradigm , 2000, The International journal of neuroscience.

[20]  P. Skinner,et al.  Effects of signal duration and rise time on the auditory evoked potential. , 1968, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  E Gordon,et al.  Does the N100 evoked potential really habituate? Evidence from a paradigm appropriate to a clinical setting. , 1992, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  C. Trenado,et al.  Modeling Neural Correlates of Auditory Attention in Evoked Potentials using Corticothalamic Feedback Dynamics , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Fast detection of wave V in ABRs using a smart single sweep analysis system , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Habituation of auditory N100 correlates with amygdaloid volumes and frontal functions in age-associated memory impairment , 1995, Physiology & Behavior.

[25]  A. Ohman,et al.  Selective attention and "habituation" of the auditory averaged evoked response in humans. , 1972, Physiology & behavior.

[26]  Rodrigo Quian Quiroga,et al.  Effects of stimulus repetitions on the event-related potential of humans and rats. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[27]  G. Steidl,et al.  Hybrid wavelet-support vector classification of waveforms , 2002 .

[28]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Relation Between Neural Response Telemetry Thresholds, T- and C-Levels, and Loudness Judgments in 12 Adult Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[29]  David Rudrauf,et al.  Estimating the time-course of coherence between single-trial brain signals: an introduction to wavelet coherence , 2002, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[31]  W D Keidel,et al.  An investigation of the human cortical evoked potential under conditions of monaural and binaural stimulation. , 1969, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[32]  P J Abbas,et al.  The Relationship Between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: Data from Adults , 2000, Ear and hearing.