Clinical Evaluation of Watermarked Medical Images

Digital watermarking medical images provides security to the images. The purpose of this study was to see whether digitally watermarked images changed clinical diagnoses when assessed by radiologists. We embedded 256 bits watermark to various medical images in the region of non-interest (RONI) and 480K bits in both region of interest (ROI) and RONI. Our results showed that watermarking medical images did not alter clinical diagnoses. In addition, there was no difference in image quality when visually assessed by the medical radiologists. We therefore concluded that digital watermarking medical images were safe in terms of preserving image quality for clinical purposes

[1]  J.M. Zain,et al.  Reversible watermarking for authentication of DICOM images , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  Digital Watermarking , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  Nick G. Kingsbury,et al.  A distortion measure for blocking artifacts in images based on human visual sensitivity , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Ioannis Pitas,et al.  Applications of toral automorphisms in image watermarking , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[5]  Pamela C. Cosman,et al.  Evaluating quality of compressed medical images: SNR, subjective rating, and diagnostic accuracy , 1994, Proc. IEEE.

[6]  Paul S. Fisher,et al.  Image quality measures and their performance , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Strict integrity control of biomedical images , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[8]  G. C. Langelaar,et al.  Watermarking digital image and video data , 2000 .