Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish

Understanding the factors that direct tissue organization during development is one of the most fundamental goals in developmental biology. Various hypotheses explain cell sorting and tissue organization on the basis of the adhesive and mechanical properties of the constituent cells. However, validating these hypotheses has been difficult due to the lack of appropriate tools to measure these parameters. Here we use atomic force microscopy (AFM) to quantify the adhesive and mechanical properties of individual ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm progenitor cells from gastrulating zebrafish embryos. Combining these data with tissue self-assembly in vitro and the sorting behaviour of progenitors in vivo, we have shown that differential actomyosin-dependent cell-cortex tension, regulated by Nodal/TGFβ-signalling (transforming growth factor β), constitutes a key factor that directs progenitor-cell sorting. These results demonstrate a previously unrecognized role for Nodal-controlled cell-cortex tension in germ-layer organization during gastrulation.

[1]  G Wayne Brodland,et al.  The Differential Interfacial Tension Hypothesis (DITH): a comprehensive theory for the self-rearrangement of embryonic cells and tissues. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  U. Tepass,et al.  Cell sorting in animal development: signalling and adhesive mechanisms in the formation of tissue boundaries. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[3]  V. Moy,et al.  Atomic force microscopy measurement of leukocyte-endothelial interaction. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[4]  Daniel J. Muller,et al.  A new technical approach to quantify cell-cell adhesion forces by AFM. , 2006, Ultramicroscopy.

[5]  R. Waugh,et al.  Rheological analysis and measurement of neutrophil indentation. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[6]  B. Gumbiner,et al.  Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[7]  C. Heisenberg,et al.  Gastrulation dynamics: cells move into focus. , 2004, Trends in cell biology.

[8]  T. Lecuit,et al.  Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[9]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Changes in the mechanical properties of fibroblasts during spreading: a micromanipulation study , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[10]  G. S. Davis,et al.  Germ-layer surface tensions and "tissue affinities" in Rana pipiens gastrulae: quantitative measurements. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[11]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Differential adhesion in morphogenesis: a modern view. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[12]  Yasuji Sawada,et al.  Improving the realism of the cellular Potts model in simulations of biological cells , 2003 .

[13]  Hermann E. Gaub,et al.  Discrete interactions in cell adhesion measured by single-molecule force spectroscopy , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[14]  D. Kane,et al.  A role for N-cadherin in mesodermal morphogenesis during gastrulation. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[15]  J. Bechhoefer,et al.  Calibration of atomic‐force microscope tips , 1993 .

[16]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Quantitative differences in tissue surface tension influence zebrafish germ layer positioning , 2008, HFSP journal.

[17]  Ferenc Horkay,et al.  Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Daniel A Fletcher,et al.  Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[19]  François Graner,et al.  Can Surface Adhesion Drive Cell-rearrangement? Part I: Biological Cell-sorting , 1993 .

[20]  E. Evans,et al.  Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[21]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  The Cellular Potts Model and Biophysical Properties of Cells, Tissues and Morphogenesis , 2007 .

[22]  W. Talbot,et al.  The EGF-CFC Protein One-Eyed Pinhead Is Essential for Nodal Signaling , 1999, Cell.

[23]  A. Schier.  Nodal signaling in vertebrate development. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[24]  A. Schier,et al.  Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation , 2001, Current Biology.

[25]  F. Marlow,et al.  Zebrafish Rho Kinase 2 Acts Downstream of Wnt11 to Mediate Cell Polarity and Effective Convergence and Extension Movements , 2002, Current Biology.

[26]  H. P. Ting-Beall,et al.  Myosin I contributes to the generation of resting cortical tension. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[27]  F. Yin,et al.  Assessing Micromechanical Properties of Cells with Atomic Force Microscopy: Importance of the Contact Point , 2007, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[28]  A K Harris,et al.  Is Cell sorting caused by differences in the work of intercellular adhesion? A critique of the Steinberg hypothesis. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  P. Mourrain,et al.  Molecular integration of casanova in the Nodal signalling pathway controlling endoderm formation. , 2002, Development.

[30]  O. Muraoka,et al.  E-cadherin is required for gastrulation cell movements in zebrafish , 2005, Mechanisms of Development.

[31]  C. Heisenberg,et al.  Shield formation at the onset of zebrafish gastrulation , 2005, Development.

[32]  R. Hynes,et al.  Broad spectrum pan-cadherin antibodies, reactive with the C-terminal 24 amino acid residues of N-cadherin. , 1990, Journal of cell science.

[33]  Anna V. Taubenberger,et al.  Wnt11 functions in gastrulation by controlling cell cohesion through Rab5c and E-cadherin. , 2005, Developmental cell.