A Multimodal Stimulation Cell Culture Bioreactor for Tissue Engineering: A Numerical Modelling Approach

The use of digital twins in tissue engineering (TE) applications is of paramount importance to reduce the number of in vitro and in vivo tests. To pursue this aim, a novel multimodal bioreactor is developed, combining 3D design with numerical stimulation. This approach will facilitate the reproducibility between studies and the platforms optimisation (physical and digital) to enhance TE. The new bioreactor was specifically designed to be additive manufactured, which could not be reproduced with conventional techniques. Specifically, the design suggested allows the application of dual stimulation (electrical and mechanical) of a scaffold cell culture. For the selection of the most appropriate material for bioreactor manufacturing several materials were assessed for their cytotoxicity. Numerical modelling methods were then applied to the new bioreactor using one of the most appropriate material (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol-modified (PETG)) to find the optimal stimulation input parameters for bone TE based on two reported in vitro studies.

[1]  X. Chen.  Laminar-to-Turbulence Transition Revealed Through a Reynolds Number Equivalence , 2019, Engineering.

[2]  Mohd Javaid,et al.  3D printing applications in bone tissue engineering. , 2020, Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma.

[3]  G. Reilly,et al.  Design and Assessment of a Dynamic Perfusion Bioreactor for Large Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds , 2018, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology.

[4]  John H Barker,et al.  Direct current electrical stimulation chamber for treating cells in vitro. , 2016, BioTechniques.

[5]  J. Ramousse,et al.  Low voltage water electrolysis: Decoupling hydrogen production using bioelectrochemical system , 2018, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[6]  V. Dhinakaran,et al.  A review on recent advancements in fused deposition modeling , 2020 .

[7]  L. Leppik,et al.  Construction and Use of an Electrical Stimulation Chamber for Enhancing Osteogenic Differentiation in Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells In Vitro. , 2019, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[8]  Henrique A. Almeida,et al.  Computer modelling and simulation of a bioreactor for tissue engineering , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[9]  Syam P. Nukavarapu,et al.  Integration of Technologies for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2019, Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences.

[10]  G. Talò,et al.  Enhancing all-in-one bioreactors by combining interstitial perfusion, electrical stimulation, on-line monitoring and testing within a single chamber for cardiac constructs , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Clare Selden,et al.  Role of Bioreactor Technology in Tissue Engineering for Clinical Use and Therapeutic Target Design , 2018, Bioengineering.

[12]  S. J. Kim,et al.  Novel effect of biphasic electric current on in vitro osteogenesis and cytokine production in human mesenchymal stromal cells. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[13]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[14]  Bikramjit Basu,et al.  Unraveling the mechanistic effects of electric field stimulation towards directing stem cell fate and function: A tissue engineering perspective. , 2018, Biomaterials.

[15]  I. Titushkin,et al.  Controlling cellular biomechanics of human mesenchymal stem cells , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  Keita Ito,et al.  Flow rates in perfusion bioreactors to maximise mineralisation in bone tissue engineering in vitro. , 2018, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Naveen Kumar Mekala,et al.  Mass transfer aspects of 3D cell cultures in tissue engineering , 2014 .

[18]  S. Pollack,et al.  In vitro bone-cell response to a capacitively coupled electrical field. The role of field strength, pulse pattern, and duty cycle. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.