THE ASSESSMENT OF HISTOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN BREAST CANCER

Morphological tumour differentiation has been shown in numerous studies to give a good prediction of prognosis in breast cancer. In the Nottingham/Tenovus study, tumour differentiation (histological grade) is assessed as part of a routine analysis of potential prognostic factors. Three features are analysed, the degree of tubule formation, variation in the size and shape of nuclei and mitotic rate. Each feature is given a score of 1-3 and grade is assigned as follows: Grade I, well differentiated, 3-5 points; Grade II, moderately differentiated, 6-7 points; Grade III, poorly differentiated, 8-9 points. Histological grade has been assessed in 625 patients with primary breast carcinoma and there is a strong correlation with prognosis; patients with well differentiated tumours have a significantly better survival than those with poorly differentiated tumours (P less than 0.0005). Grade forms an important part of the Nottingham/Tenovus prognostic index together with tumour size and lymph node stage. It is suggested that factors such as these should be used to stratify patients for appropriate therapy.

[1]  H. Bloom,et al.  Impact of tumor grade and host resistance on survival of women with breast cancer , 1971, Cancer.

[2]  J. Haybittle,et al.  The cancer research campaign (King's/Cambridge trial for early breast cancer: clinico-pathological aspects. , 1982, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  G. Garas,et al.  Intralaboratory variations in the grading of breast carcinoma. , 1982, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  J. Vegelius,et al.  Analysis of reproducibility of subjective grading systems for breast carcinoma. , 1979, Journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  I. Hamlin Possible host resistance in carcinoma of the breast: a histological study. , 1968, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  H. Bloom Further Studies on Prognosis of Breast Carcinoma , 1950, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  H. Bloom Prognosis in Carcinoma of the Breast , 1950, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  R. Prescott,et al.  Histology in Breast Cancer Prognosis , 1972, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  M. Black,et al.  Prognosis in breast cancer utilizing histologic characteristics of the primary tumor , 1975 .

[10]  R. W. Scarff,et al.  THE POSITION OF HISTOLOGY IN THE PROGNOSIS OF CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST. , 1928 .

[11]  D. C. Carter,et al.  Histological grading in breast cancer. , 1969, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  R. Blamey,et al.  A prognostic index in primary breast cancer. , 1982, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  M. Black,et al.  Further observations on prognostic factors in cancer of the female breast , 1969, Cancer.

[14]  H. Bloom,et al.  Histological Grading and Prognosis in Breast Cancer , 1957, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  C. Haagensen The Bases for the Histologic Grading of Carcinoma of the Breast , 1933 .

[16]  M. Black,et al.  Prognostic factors in cancer of the female breast. II. Reproducibility of histopathologic classification , 1966, Cancer.