Area of the diabetic ulcers estimated applying a foot scanner-based home telecare system and three reference methods.

BACKGROUND Diabetic foot ulcer area is a basic parameter used for monitoring the wound healing and effectiveness of the treatment applied. TeleDiaFoS (developed earlier in collaboration with the Department and Clinic of Gastroenterology and Metabolic Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland) is one of just a few systems available that make possible monitoring of the wound size remotely based on the foot scans transmitted to the physician from a patient's home. The aim of this study was to compare the diabetic foot ulcer areas measured using TeleDiaFoS with the results obtained using three reference methods. METHODS The reference measurements were conducted using the elliptical method with a ruler, the wound tracing method and planimetrics with the Visitrak (Smith & Nephew, London, UK) system, and the pattern-coded structured light method with the Silhouette (ARANZ Medical, Christchurch, New Zealand) system. Regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed. The study group consisted of 23 diabetes patients with plantar foot ulcers. RESULTS Thirty-three wounds were successfully examined. The measurement method influenced the measured area significantly (P=0.00005). The correlation coefficients between TeleDiaFoS and the ruler, Visitrak, and Silhouette methods were 0.949, 0.985, and 0.987, and the limits of agreement equaled -1.3±5.5 cm(2), -0.4±2.2 cm(2), and -0.6±2.1 cm(2), respectively. The strong linear relationships obtained can be used to convert the wound area measured with TeleDiaFoS to the corresponding value of each of the reference methods. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that the wound area of plantar ulcers in diabetes might be monitored effectively using the TeleDiaFoS system based on the foot scans that the patient can produce at home with no assistance of other persons.

[1]  Petri Välisuo,et al.  Lower extremity ulcer image segmentation of visual and near‐infrared imagery , 2010, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[2]  Nicolas Rannou,et al.  Image analysis of chronic wounds for determining the surface area , 2010, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[3]  Hiromi Sanada,et al.  A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK). , 2007, Journal of clinical nursing.

[4]  Julie W. Anderson,et al.  Measuring Wound Length, Width, and Area: Which Technique? , 2008, Advances in skin & wound care.

[5]  P Plassmann,et al.  Measuring leg ulcers by colour-coded structured light. , 1992, Journal of wound care.

[6]  Kath Bogie,et al.  Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  P Plassmann,et al.  Measuring wounds. , 1995, Journal of wound care.

[8]  Janez Mozina,et al.  Measurement of venous leg ulcers with a laser‐based three‐dimensional method: Comparison to computer planimetry with photography , 2007, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[9]  J. Griffin,et al.  Measurement of pressure ulcer volume using dental impression materials: suggestion from the field. , 1989, Physical therapy.

[10]  J. Pribble,et al.  Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multi-center, controlled study. , 1994, Ostomy/wound management.

[11]  Andrew Johnson,et al.  Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ulcers , 2006, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[12]  E A Tolley,et al.  A comparison of photographic and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[13]  N D Harris,et al.  Digital imaging: an accurate and easy method of measuring foot ulcers , 1999, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[14]  J. Giurini,et al.  Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial. , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  Sicco A Bus,et al.  The validity and reliability of diagnosing foot ulcers and pre-ulcerative lesions in diabetes using advanced digital photography. , 2010, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[16]  J. Fisher,et al.  Telemedicine and wound care management. , 1998, Home care provider.

[17]  B. F. Jones,et al.  Measuring area and volume of human leg ulcers by coloured coded structured light , 1992 .

[18]  A. Ciechanowska,et al.  A new imaging and data transmitting device for telemonitoring of diabetic foot syndrome patients. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[19]  Marg McGill,et al.  Integrating Telemedicine into a National Diabetes Footcare Network , 2000 .

[20]  J. Kundin,et al.  Designing and developing a new measuring instrument. , 1985, Perioperative nursing quarterly.

[21]  Piotr Foltynski,et al.  Application of the Home Telecare System in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome , 2009 .

[22]  P Plassmann,et al.  MAVIS: a non-invasive instrument to measure area and volume of wounds. Measurement of Area and Volume Instrument System. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  Thomas Ac,et al.  The healing wound: a comparison of three clinically useful methods of measurement. , 1990 .

[24]  S. McDonough,et al.  Wound measurement: the comparative reliability of direct versus photographic tracings analyzed by planimetry versus digitizing techniques. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  G. Gethin,et al.  Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry. , 2006, Journal of clinical nursing.

[26]  Andreas Körber,et al.  Three‐dimensional documentation of wound healing: First results of a new objective method for measurement , 2006, Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG.

[27]  Robert J Goldman,et al.  More than One Way to Measure a Wound: An Overview of Tools and Techniques , 2002, Advances in skin & wound care.

[28]  Piotr Foltynski,et al.  Monitoring of diabetic foot syndrome treatment: some new perspectives. , 2011, Artificial organs.

[29]  D A Ibbett,et al.  Measuring leg ulcers using a laser displacement sensor. , 1994, Physiological measurement.

[30]  R. W. Daniel,et al.  An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system , 2009, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[31]  Jane Clemensen,et al.  Telemedical treatment at home of diabetic foot ulcers , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[32]  L A Lavery,et al.  Reliability of digital videometry and acetate tracing in measuring the surface area of cutaneous wounds. , 2000, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[33]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Documentation of wound surface area from tracings of wound perimeters. Clinical report on three techniques. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[34]  Marco Romanelli,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a wound measurement and documentation system. , 2008, Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice.

[35]  C. Majeske,et al.  Reliability of wound surface area measurements. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[36]  S J Henly,et al.  Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques. , 1998, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[37]  Piotr Foltynski,et al.  Comparison of the wound area assessment methods in the diabetic foot syndrome , 2010 .