The Role of the Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Proactive and Reactive Inhibitory Control: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study

Mounting evidence suggests that response inhibition involves both proactive and reactive inhibitory control, yet its underlying neural mechanisms remain elusive. In particular, the roles of the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and inferior parietal lobe (IPL) in proactive and reactive inhibitory control are still under debate. This study aimed at examining the causal role of the right IFG and IPL in proactive and reactive inhibitory control, using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and the stop signal task. Twenty-two participants completed three sessions of the stop signal task, under anodal tDCS in the right IFG, the right IPL, or the primary visual cortex (VC; 1.5 mA for 15 min), respectively. The VC stimulation served as the active control condition. The tDCS effect for each condition was calculated as the difference between pre- and post-tDCS performance. Proactive control was indexed by the RT increase for go trials (or preparatory cost), and reactive control by the stop signal RT. Compared to the VC stimulation, anodal stimulation of the right IFG, but not that of the IPL, facilitated both proactive and reactive control. However, the facilitation of reactive control was not mediated by the facilitation of proactive control. Furthermore, tDCS did not affect the intraindividual variability in go RT. These results suggest a causal role of the right IFG, but not the right IPL, in both reactive and proactive inhibitory control.

[1]  A. Aron,et al.  Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  L. Parra,et al.  Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  A. Woods,et al.  Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[4]  R. Constable,et al.  Imaging Response Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task: Neural Correlates Independent of Signal Monitoring and Post-Response Processing , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Decomposing Decision Components in the Stop-signal Task: A Model-based Approach to Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Bram B. Zandbelt,et al.  Common and unique neural networks for proactive and reactive response inhibition revealed by independent component analysis of functional MRI data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[7]  C. Juan,et al.  Lateral prefrontal cortex contributes to maladaptive decisions , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex changes prestimulus alpha oscillation in visual short-term memory task , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  T. Robbins,et al.  A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Berryhill,et al.  Parietal Contributions to Visual Working Memory Depend on Task Difficulty , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[12]  P. Michie,et al.  Sustained brain activation supporting stop‐signal task performance , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  Daniel S Pine,et al.  Patterns of sustained attention in infancy shape the developmental trajectory of social behavior from toddlerhood through adolescence. , 2010, Developmental psychology.

[14]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  T. Flaisch,et al.  Electrical Brain Stimulation Improves Cognitive Performance by Modulating Functional Connectivity and Task-Specific Activation , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  C. Li,et al.  Dissociable Roles of Right Inferior Frontal Cortex and Anterior Insula in Inhibitory Control: Evidence from Intrinsic and Task-Related Functional Parcellation, Connectivity, and Response Profile Analyses across Multiple Datasets , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  A. Friederici,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus in the processing of non-local dependencies in music , 2016 .

[18]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  R. Kahn,et al.  Reduced Proactive Inhibition in Schizophrenia Is Related to Corticostriatal Dysfunction and Poor Working Memory , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[20]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Intra-individual variability in behavior: links to brain structure, neurotransmission and neuronal activity , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  A Network Centered on Ventral Premotor Cortex Exerts Both Facilitatory and Inhibitory Control over Primary Motor Cortex during Action Reprogramming , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Nitin Tandon,et al.  Roles for the pre-supplementary motor area and the right inferior frontal gyrus in stopping action: Electrophysiological responses and functional and structural connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. Kahn,et al.  Function of striatum beyond inhibition and execution of motor responses , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[24]  H. Möller,et al.  Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Hiroki M. Morimoto,et al.  Functional dissociation in right inferior frontal cortex during performance of go/no-go task. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[27]  Jobi S. George,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals dissociable mechanisms for global versus selective corticomotor suppression underlying the stopping of action. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Comparing Cortical Plasticity Induced by Conventional and High-Definition 4 × 1 Ring tDCS: A Neurophysiological Study , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[29]  A. Aron.  From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[30]  C. Miniussi,et al.  A Simultaneous Modulation of Reactive and Proactive Inhibition Processes by Anodal tDCS on the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Controlling Your Impulses: Electrical Stimulation of the Human Supplementary Motor Complex Prevents Impulsive Errors , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  G. Logan.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[33]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Triangulating a Cognitive Control Network Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  Men-Tzung Lo,et al.  Revealing the brain's adaptability and the transcranial direct current stimulation facilitating effect in inhibitory control by multiscale entropy , 2014, NeuroImage.

[36]  M. Catani,et al.  A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  G. Xue,et al.  Spatiotemporal Neural Pattern Similarity Supports Episodic Memory , 2015, Current Biology.

[38]  T. Shallice,et al.  Frontal lesions and sustained attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Modulating inhibitory control with direct current stimulation of the superior medial frontal cortex , 2011, NeuroImage.

[40]  D. Bjorklund,et al.  A developmental perspective on individual differences in inhibition , 1994 .

[41]  R. Schachar,et al.  Dissociation of response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task using event‐related fMRI , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[42]  G. Logan,et al.  Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  A pilot study on effects of 4×1 High-Definition tDCS on motor cortex excitability , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[45]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Dissociated neural substrates underlying impulsive choice and impulsive action , 2016, NeuroImage.

[46]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Neural Substrates of Contingency Learning and Executive Control: Dissociating Physical, Valuative, and Behavioral Changes , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[47]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[48]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Maneesh C. Patel,et al.  Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  David P MacKinnon,et al.  RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[51]  V. Walsh,et al.  Modulating behavioral inhibition by tDCS combined with cognitive training , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Responding with Restraint: What Are the Neurocognitive Mechanisms? , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[54]  R. Leech,et al.  A functional network perspective on response inhibition and attentional control , 2014, Nature Communications.

[55]  Adam R. Aron,et al.  Stopping speech suppresses the task-irrelevant hand , 2012, Brain and Language.

[56]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Preparation to Inhibit a Response Complements Response Inhibition during Performance of a Stop-Signal Task , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Nicholas T. Franklin,et al.  Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  C. Wardak.  The Role of the Supplementary Motor Area in Inhibitory Control in Monkeys and Humans , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  M. Bellgrove,et al.  The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  J. Jefferys,et al.  Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[62]  Howard Chertkow,et al.  Increased variability accompanies frontal lobe damage in dementia , 2002, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[63]  C. Juan,et al.  Brain stimulation and inhibitory control , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[64]  O. Tzeng,et al.  Unleashing Potential: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Right Posterior Parietal Cortex Improves Change Detection in Low-Performing Individuals , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  C. Li,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Functional Connectivity Delineates Distinct Roles of the Inferior Frontal Cortex and Presupplementary Motor Area in Stop Signal Inhibition , 2022 .

[66]  D. Stuss,et al.  Staying on the job: the frontal lobes control individual performance variability. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[67]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  Arthur P. Shimamura,et al.  Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  John Duncan,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[70]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Common neural substrates for inhibition of spoken and manual responses. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[71]  Adam P. Morris,et al.  Executive Brake Failure following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe , 2006 .

[72]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[73]  René S. Kahn,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Functional MRI Reveal Cortical and Subcortical Interactions during Stop-signal Response Inhibition , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  Marom Bikson,et al.  The Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial. , 2015, Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina.

[75]  T. Mima,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation changes human endowment effect , 2013, Neuroscience Research.

[76]  Christopher J. Cannistraci,et al.  Sensorimotor‐independent prefrontal activity during response inhibition , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[77]  A. Aron,et al.  Proactive Selective Response Suppression Is Implemented via the Basal Ganglia , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[78]  M. Vink,et al.  Expectations and violations: Delineating the neural network of proactive inhibitory control , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[79]  V. Stuphorn,et al.  Supplementary Motor Area Exerts Proactive and Reactive Control of Arm Movements , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[80]  Jeffrey P. Toth,et al.  Dissociation of attentional processes in patients with focal frontal and posterior lesions , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[81]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Engagement of large-scale networks is related to individual differences in inhibitory control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[82]  Daniel C. Javitt,et al.  Activation of Inhibition: Diminishing Impulsive Behavior by Direct Current Stimulation over the Inferior Frontal Gyrus , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[83]  A. Bechara,et al.  Agency Modulates the Lateral and Medial Prefrontal Cortex Responses in Belief-Based Decision Making , 2013, PloS one.