Comparison of geographic classification schemes for Mid-Atlantic stream fish assemblages

Understanding the influence of geographic factors in structuring fish assemblages is crucial to developing a comprehensive assessment of stream conditions. We compared the classification strengths (CS) of geographic groups (ecoregions and catchments), stream order, and groups based on cluster analysis of fish assemblage data from 200 wadeable streams in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands. We 1st calculated intersite similarity indices (Bray–Curtis on relative abundance; Dice–Sørensen on presence/absence), then compared overall mean within-group similarities (W̄) with among-group similarities (B̄). We used subsets of the data to test CS from: 1) 31 reference sites defined on chemistry and habitat criteria, and 2) 21 samples from 8 sites that had been resampled within and between years to estimate the maximum similarity expected for any of the classifications. We assessed the strength of each classification by determining the degree to which W̄ was greater than B̄. Sites classified by taxonomic clusters had higher CS than did sites grouped by stream order, US Geological Survey 4-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) catchments, and ecoregions. Except for taxonomic clusters, the CS values were greater when all sites were used in the analysis than when only reference sites were used. The mean similarities for the revisits were 2 to 3 times greater than for all other classifications. We used nonmetric multidimensional scaling as an alternative approach to detecting geographic structure in the data. We found little separation of ecoregion or catchment groups except at very broad spatial scales. The relatively weak CS of any of the geographic groups suggests that the interaction of complex zoogeographic patterns and a long history of human disturbance has masked any fine-scale structure of regional fish assemblages.

[1]  David P. Larsen,et al.  Comparing strengths of geographic and nongeographic classifications of stream benthic macroinvertebrates in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands, USA , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[2]  John Van Sickle,et al.  Using Mean Similarity Dendrograms to Evaluate Classifications , 1997 .

[3]  M. Barbour,et al.  Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton , 1999 .

[4]  A. Herlihy,et al.  The effects of acidic deposition on streams in the Appalachian Mountain and Piedmont Region of the Mid‐Atlantic United States , 1993 .

[5]  J. Omernik,et al.  Correspondence between spatial patterns in fish assemblages in ohio streams and aquatic ecoregions , 1986 .

[6]  I. Schlosser.  Environmental variation, life history attributes, and community structure in stream fishes: Implications for environmental management and assessment , 1990 .

[7]  R. Mayden.  VICARIANCE BIOGEOGRAPHY, PARSIMONY, AND EVOLUTION IN NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES , 1988 .

[8]  James R. Karr,et al.  Regional Application of an Index of Biotic Integrity Based on Stream Fish Communities , 1984 .

[9]  W. Sharpe,et al.  Episodic acidification and changes in fish diversity in Pennsylvania headwater streams , 1997 .

[10]  T. Legovic.  Statistical ecology. A primer on methods and computing: J.A. Ludwig and J.F. Reynolds. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York, 1988. 337 pp. + MS-DOS diskette of 21 Basic Programs, paperback, £16.75. ISBN 0-471-61315-0 , 1991 .

[11]  G. Helfman,et al.  Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  The distribution of the fishes of Arkansas: a multivariate analysis , 1988 .

[13]  R. Mayden,et al.  Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes , 1996 .

[14]  H. Fowler.  A study of the fishes of the Southern Piedmont and coastal plain , 1945 .

[15]  W. Matthews,et al.  Similarities in Fish Distribution and Water Quality Patterns in Streams of Arkansas: Congruence of Multivariate Analyses , 1992 .

[16]  M. Meador,et al.  Methods for sampling fish communities as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program , 1993 .

[17]  N. Burkhead,et al.  Freshwater Fishes of Virginia , 1994 .

[18]  John Lyons,et al.  The Length of Stream to Sample with a Towed Electrofishing Unit When Fish Species Richness is Estimated , 1992 .

[19]  James D. Wickham,et al.  An ecological assessment of the United States mid-Atlantic region , 1997 .

[20]  R. Hughes,et al.  Correspondence Between Ecoregions and Spatial Patterns in Stream Ecosystems in Oregon , 1988 .

[21]  A. N. Strahler.  Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology , 1957 .

[22]  E. Smith,et al.  Community similarity and the analysis of multispecies environmental data: A unified statistical approach , 1990 .

[23]  B. Hill,et al.  Ecoregions and benthic diatom assemblages in Mid-Atlantic Highlands streams, USA , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[24]  Robert M. Hughes,et al.  Classification strengths of ecoregions, catchments, and geographic clusters for aquatic vertebrates in Oregon , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[25]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[26]  Don L. Stevens,et al.  VARIABLE DENSITY GRID‐BASED SAMPLING DESIGNS FOR CONTINUOUS SPATIAL POPULATIONS , 1997 .

[27]  D. M. Day,et al.  Influence of Stream Location in a Drainage Network on the Index of Biotic Integrity , 1992 .

[28]  J. Omernik.  Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[29]  P. Angermeier,et al.  Local vs. regional influences on local diversity in stream fish communities of Virginia , 1998 .

[30]  P. Angermeier,et al.  Relations Between Fish Metrics and Measures of Anthropogenic Disturbance in Three IBI Regions in Virginia , 2020 .

[31]  J. Ludwig,et al.  Statistical ecology: a primer on methods & computing , 1988 .

[32]  James R. Karr,et al.  Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale , 1986 .

[33]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Multivariate analysis in community ecology , 1984 .

[34]  J. Omernik,et al.  Level III and IV ecoregions of Pennsylvania and the Blue Ridge Mountains, the central Appalachian Ridge and Valley, and the Central appalachians of Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland , 1996 .

[35]  J. R. Stauffer,et al.  Fishes of the Greenbrier river, West Virginia, with drainage history of the Central Appalachians , 1978 .

[36]  Steven G. Paulsen,et al.  Designing a Spatially Balanced, Randomized Site Selection Process for Regional Stream Surveys: The EMAP Mid-Atlantic Pilot Study , 2000 .

[37]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[38]  Chris O. Yoder,et al.  The Role of Biological Indicators in a State Water Quality Management Process , 1998 .

[39]  R. Hughes,et al.  The relationship of aquatic ecoregions, river basins and physiographic provinces to the ichthyogeographic regions of Oregon , 1987 .