A characterization of the effect of limb position on EMG features to guide the development of effective prosthetic control schemes

Electromyogram (EMG) pattern recognition has long been used for the control of upper limb prostheses. More recently, it has been shown that variability induced during functional use, such as changes in limb position and dynamic contractions, can have a substantial impact on the robustness of EMG pattern recognition. This work further investigates the reasons for pattern recognition performance degradation due to the limb position variation. The main focus is on the impact of limb position variation on features of the EMG, as measured using separability and repeatability metrics. The results show that when the limb is moved to a position different from the one in which the classifier is trained, both the separability and repeatability of the data decrease. It is shown how two previously proposed classification methods, multiple position training and dual-stage classification, resolve the position effect problem to some extent through increasing either separability or repeatability but not both. A hybrid classification method which exhibits a compromise between separability and repeatability is proposed in this work. It is shown that, when tested with the limb in 16 different positions, this method increases classification accuracy from an average of 70% (single position training) to 89% (hybrid approach). This hybrid method significantly (p<;0.05) outperforms multiple position training (an average of 86%) and dual-stage classification (an average of 85%).

[1]  Z. Hasan,et al.  Relative activation of two human elbow flexors under isometric conditions: a cautionary note concerning flexor equivalence , 1986, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Nathan E. Bunderson,et al.  Quantification of Feature Space Changes With Experience During Electromyogram Pattern Recognition Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  B. Hudgins,et al.  The effect of electrode displacements on pattern recognition based myoelectric control , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  R N Scott,et al.  Myoelectric prostheses: state of the art. , 1988, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[5]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A training strategy to reduce classification degradation due to electrode displacements in pattern recognition based myoelectric control , 2008, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[6]  B Hudgins,et al.  Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[7]  Dario Farina,et al.  Effect of arm position on the prediction of kinematics from EMG in amputees , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  Richard Shiavi,et al.  Electromyography: Physiology, Engineering, and Noninvasive Applications [Book Review] , 2006, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[10]  K. Englehart,et al.  Resolving the Limb Position Effect in Myoelectric Pattern Recognition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  Erik J. Scheme,et al.  Improving myoelectric pattern recognition positional robustness using advanced training protocols , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  J. C. Jamison,et al.  Muscle synergies and isometric torque production: influence of supination and pronation level on elbow flexion. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  Improving Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Robustness to Electrode Shift by Changing Interelectrode Distance and Electrode Configuration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  A.D.C. Chan,et al.  Examining the adverse effects of limb position on pattern recognition based myoelectric control , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[15]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Preliminary Study On The Influence Of Inertia And Weight Of The Prosthesis On The Emg Pattern Recognition Robustness , 2011 .

[16]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Training Strategies for Mitigating the Effect of Proportional Control on Classification in Pattern Recognition–Based Myoelectric Control , 2013, Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO.

[17]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Toward attenuating the impact of arm positions on electromyography pattern-recognition based motion classification in transradial amputees , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[18]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Myoelectric control systems - A survey , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[19]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  A human-assisting manipulator teleoperated by EMG signals and arm motions , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[20]  A. Boschmann,et al.  Reducing the limb position effect in pattern recognition based myoelectric control using a high density electrode array , 2013, 2013 ISSNIP Biosignals and Biorobotics Conference: Biosignals and Robotics for Better and Safer Living (BRC).

[21]  Blair A. Lock,et al.  Determining the Optimal Window Length for Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control: Balancing the Competing Effects of Classification Error and Controller Delay , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  陈亮,et al.  Effect of Upper-Limb Positions on Motion Pattern Recognition Using Electromyography , 2011 .

[24]  Evelyn Morin,et al.  Use of the Fast Orthogonal Search Method to Estimate Optimal Joint Angle For Upper Limb Hill-Muscle Models , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.