Intuitive Clinician Control Interface for a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis: A Case Study

This paper presents a potential solution to the challenge of configuring powered knee-ankle prostheses in a clinical setting. Typically, powered prostheses use impedance-based control schemes that contain several independent controllers which correspond to consecutive periods along the gait cycle. This control strategy has numerous control parameters and switching rules that are generally tuned by researchers or technicians and not by a certified prosthetist. We propose an intuitive clinician control interface (CCI) in which clinicians tune a powered knee-ankle prosthesis based on a virtual constraint control scheme, which tracks desired periodic joint trajectories based on a continuous measurement of the phase (or progression) of gait. The interface derives virtual constraints from clinician-designed joint kinematic trajectories. An experiment was conducted in which a certified prosthetist used the control interface to configure a powered knee-ankle prosthesis for a transfemoral amputee subject during level-ground walking trials. While it usually takes engineers hours of tuning individual parameters by trial and error, the CCI allowed the clinician to tune the powered prosthesis controller in under 10 min. This allowed the clinician to improve several amputee gait outcome metrics, such as gait symmetry. These results suggest that the CCI can improve the clinical viability of emerging powered knee-ankle prostheses.

[1]  Roy Tranberg,et al.  Frontal plane pelvis and hip kinematics of transfemoral amputee gait. Effect of a prosthetic foot with active ankle dorsiflexion and individualized training – a case study , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[2]  Robert D. Gregg,et al.  Design and Benchtop Validation of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis with High-Torque, Low-Impedance Actuators , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[3]  Robert Riener,et al.  Review of the actuators of active knee prostheses and their target design outputs for activities of daily living , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[4]  R. Seymour.  Prosthetics and orthotics : lower limb and spinal , 2002 .

[5]  E. Catmull,et al.  A CLASS OF LOCAL INTERPOLATING SPLINES , 1974 .

[6]  Susanne W. Lipfert,et al.  Impulsive ankle push-off powers leg swing in human walking , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered ankle-foot prosthesis , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[8]  Kimberly A. Ingraham,et al.  Configuring a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis for Transfemoral Amputees within Five Specific Ambulation Modes , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Robert D. Gregg,et al.  A Robust Parameterization of Human Gait Patterns Across Phase-Shifting Perturbations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Prosthetic intervention effects on activity of lower-extremity amputees. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  A Robotic Leg Prosthesis: Design, Control, and Implementation , 2014, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[12]  A. Kuo,et al.  Mechanical and energetic consequences of reduced ankle plantar-flexion in human walking , 2015, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  J. Bowker,et al.  Atlas of Limb Prosthetics: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles , 1992 .

[14]  F. Prince,et al.  Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[15]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Running With a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  Robert D. Gregg,et al.  A Phase Variable Approach to Volitional Control of Powered Knee-Ankle Prostheses , 2018, 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[17]  Torsten Bumgarner,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .

[18]  S. Simon.  Gait Analysis, Normal and Pathological Function. , 1993 .

[19]  Thomas Sugar,et al.  Robotic transtibial prosthesis with biomechanical energy regeneration , 2009, Ind. Robot.

[20]  H. Herr,et al.  A Clinical Comparison of Variable-Damping and Mechanically Passive Prosthetic Knee Devices , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[21]  Robert D. Gregg,et al.  Toward Unified Control of a Powered Prosthetic Leg: A Simulation Study , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[22]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Upslope Walking With a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis: Initial Results With an Amputee Subject , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  J. P. Paul,et al.  Alignment of lower-limb prostheses. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[24]  Kara K. Patterson,et al.  Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[25]  E. Westervelt,et al.  Feedback Control of Dynamic Bipedal Robot Locomotion , 2007 .

[26]  Alfred D. Grant.  Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function , 2010 .

[27]  Robert Riener,et al.  Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[28]  Bernhard Greitemann.  Technische Orthopädie: Prothetik an der unteren Extremität am Beispiel der Oberschenkelamputation , 2017 .

[29]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Clutchable series-elastic actuator: Implications for prosthetic knee design , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[30]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[31]  Robert D. Gregg,et al.  Continuous-Phase Control of a Powered Knee–Ankle Prosthesis: Amputee Experiments Across Speeds and Inclines , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[32]  Koushil Sreenath,et al.  A Compliant Hybrid Zero Dynamics Controller for Stable, Efficient and Fast Bipedal Walking on MABEL , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[33]  S. Kirker,et al.  An assessment of the intelligent knee prosthesis , 1996 .

[34]  Karl E Zelik,et al.  A unified perspective on ankle push-off in human walking , 2016, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[35]  David C. Post,et al.  Design and experimental implementation of a hybrid zero dynamics-based controller for planar bipeds with curved feet , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[36]  Robert Gailey,et al.  Use of and confidence in administering outcome measures among clinical prosthetists: Results from a national survey and mixed-methods training program , 2015, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[37]  Jessy W. Grizzle,et al.  Performance Analysis and Feedback Control of ATRIAS, A Three-Dimensional Bipedal Robot , 2014 .

[38]  Robert D. Gregg,et al.  Preliminary experiments with a unified controller for a powered knee-ankle prosthetic leg across walking speeds , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[39]  A. Lees,et al.  Adjustments in gait symmetry with walking speed in trans-femoral and trans-tibial amputees. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[40]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  Virtual Constraint Control of a Powered Prosthetic Leg: From Simulation to Experiments With Transfemoral Amputees , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[41]  Miroslav Janura,et al.  Temporal–spatial parameters of gait in transfemoral amputees: Comparison of bionic and mechanically passive knee joints , 2014, Prosthetics and orthotics international.