Predicting semantic priming at the item level

The current study explores a set of variables that have the potential to predict semantic priming effects for 300 prime–target associates at the item level. Young and older adults performed either lexical decision (LDT) or naming tasks. A multiple regression procedure was used to predict priming based upon prime characteristics, target characteristics, and prime–target semantic similarity. Results indicate that semantic priming (a) can be reliably predicted at an item level; (b) is equivalent in magnitude across standardized measures of priming in LDTs and naming tasks; (c) is greater following quickly recognized primes; (d) is greater in LDTs for targets that produce slow lexical decision latencies; (e) is greater for pairs high in forward associative strength across tasks and across stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs); (f) is greater for pairs high in backward associative strength in both tasks, but only at a long SOA; and (g) does not vary as a function of estimates from latent semantic analysis (LSA). Based upon these results, it is suggested that researchers take extreme caution in comparing priming effects across different item sets. Moreover, the current findings lend support to spreading activation and feature overlap theories of priming, but do not support priming based upon contextual similarity as captured by LSA.

[1]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention , 1979 .

[2]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  K I Forster,et al.  The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[4]  D. Balota,et al.  Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Effects of association and imageability on phonological mapping , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  W. F. Battig,et al.  Handbook of semantic word norms , 1978 .

[7]  D. Balota,et al.  Age-related differences in lexical access, spreading activation, and simple pronunciation. , 1988, Psychology and aging.

[8]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Is there a “strength effect” in automatic semantic priming? , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Handbook of Psychology: Experimental Psychology , 2003 .

[10]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[11]  S. Joordens,et al.  The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Dissociated backward priming effects in lexical decision and pronunciation tasks , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  D. Plaut,et al.  Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[17]  D. Balota,et al.  Summation of activation: evidence from multiple primes that converge and diverge within semantic memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  James H. Neely,et al.  When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. , 1995 .

[19]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: mediated priming revisited. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Barry Gordon,et al.  Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. , 1983 .

[21]  S. D. Lima,et al.  General slowing in semantic priming and word recognition. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[22]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Accessing Different Types of Lexical Semantic Information: Evidence From Priming , 1995 .

[23]  D. Plaut Double dissociation without modularity: evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[24]  C. A. Becker Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  U. Hess,et al.  Transformations for within-subject designs: a Monte Carlo investigation. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  David A. Balota,et al.  Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item Level , 1997 .

[27]  Lloyd G. Humphreys,et al.  Research on individual differences requires correlational analysis, not ANOVA , 1978 .

[28]  H. Kolk,et al.  Three-step priming in lexical decision , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[29]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic Context Effects on Visual Word Processing: A Hybrid Prospective-Retrospective Processing Theory , 1989 .

[30]  David A. Balota,et al.  The Utility of Item-Level Analyses in Model Evaluation: A Reply to Seidenberg and Plaut , 1998 .

[31]  S. Lupker Semantic Priming without Association: A Second Look. , 1984 .

[32]  J. Shelton,et al.  How semantic is automatic semantic priming? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  S. Tipper,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[34]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Priming nouns and verbs: Differential influences of semantic and grammatical cues in the two cerebral hemispheres , 2006, Brain and Language.

[35]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Phonetic Biases in Voice Key Response Time Measurements , 2002 .

[36]  W. Kintsch,et al.  High-Dimensional Semantic Space Accounts of Priming. , 2006 .

[37]  M. Lucas,et al.  Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. , 1993 .

[39]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  T. McNamara Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition , 2005 .

[41]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  With great expectations, can two "wrongs" prime a "right"? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  K. McRae,et al.  Automatic semantic similarity priming. , 1998 .

[43]  Jacob Cohen The Cost of Dichotomization , 1983 .

[44]  D. Burke,et al.  Why do semantic priming effects increase in old age? A meta-analysis. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[45]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[46]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[47]  Fraser A. Bleasdale,et al.  Concreteness-dependent associative priming: Separate lexical organization for concrete and abstract words. , 1987 .

[48]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[49]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[50]  T. Salthouse Speed of behavior and its implications for cog-nition , 1985 .

[51]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[52]  Jeanette Altarriba,et al.  Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions , 1988 .

[53]  T. Carr,et al.  Implications of measures of reliability for theories of priming: Activity in semantic memory is inherently noisy and uncoordinated , 2005 .

[54]  A. Cutler Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? , 1981, Cognition.

[55]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[56]  S. L. Ehrenreich,et al.  Structure and Search of the Internal Lexicon. , 1979 .

[57]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways in naming: a reevaluation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[61]  T. McNamara,et al.  Semantic Memory and Priming , 2003 .