Determinants of vigilance behavior in the ring-tailed coati (Nasua nasua): the importance of within-group spatial position

Individuals living in social groups are predicted to live under unequal predation risk due to their spatial location within the group. Previous work has indicated that individuals located at the edge of groups have higher “domains of danger”, thus are more likely to engage in vigilance or antipredator behavior. We studied the determinants of vigilance behavior in two groups of ring-tailed coatis in Iguazu National Park, Argentina. In addition to the expected pattern that coatis were more vigilant at the edge of the group, we found that individuals were particularly vigilant at the front edge of the group. This pattern conforms to predictions of differing predation risk caused by sit-and-wait predators with respect to mobile animal groups. In addition, coatis exhibited less vigilance when the number of neighbors within 5 m and group size increased. Of the three spatial variables tested, within-group spatial position was the most important predictor variable determining vigilance levels. These results confirm that spatial position has major effects on vigilance behavior, and that group directionality is an important factor which should be taken into account when measuring vigilance behavior. Coatis were more vigilant when juveniles less than 6 months old were in the groups. The presence of these young juveniles also affected the relationship between alarm response and vigilance levels. Coatis were more vigilant after strong alarm reactions, but only when young juveniles were not present in the groups. This may indicate that coatis give differential responses to alarm calls depending on the age of the caller. A comparison of antipredator vigilance between coatis and sympatric capuchin monkeys is consistent with the hypothesis that terrestriality leads to higher perceive predation risk for coatis.

[1]  I. Vine,et al.  Risk of visual detection and pursuitby a predator and the selective advantage of flocking behaviour. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  I. R. Inglis,et al.  Vigilance and Flock Size in Brent Geese: The Edge Effect , 1981 .

[4]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  An empirically based estimate of home range , 1981 .

[5]  M. Elgar,et al.  PREDATOR VIGILANCE AND GROUP SIZE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE , 1989, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  C. Fitzgibbon A cost to individuals with reduced vigilance in groups of Thomson's Gazelles hunted by Cheetahs , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  A. D. Brown,et al.  Dietary variability in Cebus apella in extreme habitats: evidence for adaptability. , 1990, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[8]  C. Janson Social correlates of individual spatial choice in foraging groups of brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Charles H. Janson,et al.  Ecological consequences of individual spatial choice in foraging groups of brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  J. M. Black,et al.  Foraging dynamics in goose flocks: the cost of living on the edge , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  J. Burger,et al.  Effect of group size on vigilance while drinking in the coati, Nasua narica in Costa Rica , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  Jens Krause DIFFERENTIAL FITNESS RETURNS IN RELATION TO SPATIAL POSITION IN GROUPS , 1994, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  S. L. Lima On the personal benefits of anti-predatory vigilance , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  M. Gompper Sociality and asociality in white-nosed coatis (Nasua narica): foraging costs and benefits , 1996 .

[15]  Jens Krause,et al.  Mortality risk of spatial positions in animal groups: The danger of being in the front , 1997 .

[16]  Charles H. Janson,et al.  Experimental analysis of food detection in capuchin monkeys: effects of distance, travel speed, and resource size , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  Carolyn L. Hall,et al.  Spatial benefits afforded by high rank in white-faced capuchins , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  A. Treves The influence of group size and neighbors on vigilance in two species of arboreal monkeys , 1998 .

[19]  Lisa M. Rose Behavioral ecology of white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) in Costa Rica , 1999 .

[20]  R. Steenbeek,et al.  Vigilance in wild Thomas's langurs (Presbytis thomasi ): the importance of infanticide risk , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  A. Treves,et al.  Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggregation , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  T. Caraco,et al.  Social Foraging Theory , 2018 .

[23]  Janice C. Daniel,et al.  Group size effects in quokkas , 2001 .

[24]  D. Kramer,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Intermittent Locomotion1 , 2001 .

[25]  A. Treves,et al.  Vigilance and aggregation in black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  B. McCowan,et al.  Age differences and developmental trends in alarm peep responses by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) , 2001, American journal of primatology.

[27]  D. Kramer,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Intermittent Locomotion , 2001 .

[28]  M. D. Bitetti,et al.  Home-range use by the tufted capuchin monkey ( Cebus apella nigritus ) in a subtropical rainforest of Argentina , 2001 .

[29]  G. Beauchamp Should vigilance always decrease with group size? , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  The response of a selfish herd to an attack from outside the group perimeter. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  Luc-Alain Giraldeau,et al.  Head position as an indicator of producer and scrounger tactics in a ground-feeding bird , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Yellow-Footed Rock-Wallaby Group Size Effects Reflect A Trade-Off , 2001 .

[33]  Visibility, group size, vigilance, and drinking behavior in coati (Nasua narica) and white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus): experimental evidence , 2001, acta ethologica.

[34]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[35]  Christine C. Hass,et al.  Anti-predator benefits of group living in white-nosed coatis (Nasua narica) , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  Social monitoring and vigilance behavior in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  C. Clark,et al.  The behavioral ecology of a cognitive constraint: limited attention , 2003 .

[38]  Laurie M. Kauffman,et al.  Are vigilance, risk from avian predators and group size consequences of habitat structure? a comparison of three species of squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedii, S. boliviensis, and S. sciureus) , 2003 .

[39]  J. Lind,et al.  Does an opportunistic predator preferentially attack nonvigilant prey? , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  Guy Beauchamp,et al.  Group-size effects on vigilance: a search for mechanisms , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[41]  M. Cords Vigilance and mixed-species association of some East African forest monkeys , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[42]  Janice C. Daniel,et al.  Yellow-bellied marmots discriminate between the alarm calls of individuals and are more responsive to calls from juveniles , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  P. Izar,et al.  Interaction Between Capuchins and Coatis: Nonagonistic Behaviors and Lack of Predation , 2004, International Journal of Primatology.

[44]  Michael M. Delm Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[45]  Territory size and location in animals with refuges: influence of predation risk , 1988, Evolutionary Ecology.

[46]  M. D. Bitetti,et al.  Food-associated calls and audience effects in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella nigritus , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  T. Caro,et al.  Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals , 2006 .