Education for sustainable development – an inter‐disciplinary pilot module for undergraduate engineers and scientists

The coming together of a number of initiatives provided a springboard for an innovative pilot programme in education for sustainable development. For some time problem‐based learning has gathered momentum as an approach to educating professionals. More recently, there has been a burgeoning interest in inter‐disciplinary approaches to the complex societal and environmental issues that face the world as a whole. At the same time, professional engineering institutions have been reflecting on appropriate approaches to the education and development of future engineers. Building on work already undertaken by some of the authors, the Royal Academy of Engineering sponsored an inter‐disciplinary pilot programme in sustainable development for undergraduate engineers and scientists in the University of Manchester. The pilot was innovative not only in its inter‐disciplinary approach to sustainable development but also in its approach to the development of the curriculum. Inter‐disciplinary exercises were designed that enabled a contextual, active, collaborative and cumulative approach to learning. The assessment was also designed to align to the learning approach. Evaluation of the pilot programme suggests that it was well received by the students, and the post‐doctoral researchers who acted as facilitators, and also that there were gains in both understanding of the issues and also in approaches to learning.

[1]  Higher Education and the Challenge of Sustainability: Problems, Promises and Good Practice , 2007 .

[2]  J. Rayner Background , 2003, Adv. Decis. Sci..

[3]  J. Bligh,et al.  Getting the measure of interprofessional learning , 2006, Medical education.

[4]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION II. TEACHING METHODS THAT WORK , 2000 .

[5]  F.K. Fink Integration of engineering practice into curriculum-25 years of experience with problem based learning , 1999, FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011.

[6]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[7]  J. Last Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[8]  A. Hofmeyer,et al.  Acknowledging complexity: Critically analyzing context to understand interdisciplinary research , 2007, Journal of interprofessional care.

[9]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  REFLECTIONS ON PROJECT WORK AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING , 1996 .

[10]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[11]  Roland Clift,et al.  The Role of the Professional Engineer and Scientist in Sustainable Development , 2005 .

[12]  David Kember,et al.  Peer Assessment of an Individual ‘s Contribution to a Group Project , 1993 .

[13]  J. Rotmans Societal Innovation: Between Dream and Reality Lies Complexity , 2005 .

[14]  C Spong,et al.  GETTING A MEASURE , 2003 .

[15]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Future of Engineering Education: Part 2. Teaching Methods That Work. , 2000 .

[16]  C E Engel,et al.  THE MODIFIED ESSAY QUESTION FOR TESTING PROBLEM‐SOLVING SKILLS , 1980, The Medical journal of Australia.

[17]  Alice M. Agogino Educating the Engineer of 2020 , 2008 .