Abstract The twin requirements of reducing CO2 emission levels and increasing the level of penetration of renewable energy will involve innovative technical and operational solutions. This paper describes a novel but proven process ( CO 2 +3 H 2 → CH 3 OH + H 2 O ) which could be adapted to use, as input reagents, CO2 emitted from fossil-fuelled power stations and hydrogen from electrolysis of water by a zero-emissions electricity source, e.g. renewable and/or nuclear energy. This approach, in addition to addressing the above two issues, would produce methanol for which there is a ready and expanding market. A preliminary analysis is presented of the process economics and operational regimes necessary in the UK Electrical Supply Industry to accommodate the methanol plant. Four different designs are assessed, all based on a supply of renewable energy limited to 16 h / day when demand is off-peak. Option ‘A’ relies on a variable 100– 500 MW supply, whereas Option ‘B’ makes use of a steady 100 MW during the availability period. Option ‘C’ is identical to ‘B’, except for the use of pressurised electrolysers at 30 bar instead of conventional ones. Option ‘D’ departs from ‘B’ with the use of hydrogen-powered fuel cells for power generation during the period of no availability. In the absence of a market for the electrolytic oxygen, Option ‘B’ is found to be the most economical, and it should be profitable if a favourable taxation regime applies on zero-emission automotive fuels. However, if the oxygen can be sold to a local industry via pipeline, Option ‘C’ could be potentially viable, even in the absence of tax breaks. It is claimed that significant benefits might accrue from successful development of a methanol process and that it may ease the absorption of increasing levels of embedded generation into the electricity supply network.
[1]
B. Eliasson.
CO2 Chemistry: An Option for CO2 Emission Control?
,
1994
.
[2]
C. L. Leci,et al.
Assessment of CO2 removal from power station flue gas
,
1992
.
[3]
Sanna Syri,et al.
Sulfur Emissions, Abatement Technologies and Related Costs for Europe in the RAINS Model Database
,
1998
.
[4]
Gilbert F. Froment,et al.
A Steady-State Kinetic Model for Methanol Synthesis and the Water Gas Shift Reaction on a Commercial Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 Catalyst
,
1996
.
[5]
M. Specht,et al.
Comparison of CO2 sources for the synthesis of renewable methanol
,
1998
.
[6]
C. L. Leci,et al.
Financial implications on power generation costs resulting from the parasitic effect of CO2 capture using liquid scrubbing technology from power station flue gases
,
1996
.
[7]
H. Wendt,et al.
Nine years of research and development on advanced water electrolysis. A review of the research programme of the Commission of the European Communities
,
1988
.
[8]
I. Metcalfe,et al.
Methanol Synthesis from CO/CO2/H2over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3at Differential and Finite Conversions
,
1998
.
[9]
I. Metcalfe,et al.
Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to methanol over palladium-promoted Cu/ZnO/A12O3 catalysts
,
1996
.
[10]
Hartmut Wendt,et al.
Hydrogen production by water electrolysis
,
1991
.