Integrating Non-Repetitive LT Encoders With Modified Distribution to Achieve Unequal Erasure Protection

The performance of LT code is highly related to the code length. A decoder is more likely to deplete degree-1 encoding symbols and terminate during early stage when the code length is short. In this work, we modify the robust Soliton distribution (RSD) and increase the degree-1 proportion. More degree-1 encoding symbols can be generated to relieve early decoding termination. The proportion of low degrees, except for degree-1, is also reduced. Therefore, receivers collect less encoding symbols carrying redundant information. In addition, Non-Repetitive (NR) encoding scheme is proposed to avoid producing repeated degree-1 encoding symbols. To improve video transmission quality, previous studies redesign LT codes to provide Unequal Error Protection (UEP) for different Scalable Video Coding (SVC) layers. Unlike those studies to modify the code structure, we integrate multiple NR encoders to achieve UEP ability. Experimental results show that our UEP scheme outperforms previous studies in terms of the PSNR.

[1]  Michael Luby,et al.  LT codes , 2002, The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Proceedings..

[2]  Román Belda,et al.  Analysis and Evaluation of Adaptive LDPC AL-FEC Codes for Content Download Services , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[3]  Michael Luby,et al.  A digital fountain approach to reliable distribution of bulk data , 1998, SIGCOMM '98.

[4]  Amin Shokrollahi,et al.  Analysis of the Second Moment of the LT Decoder , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Thomas Stockhammer,et al.  Reliable Multimedia Download Delivery in Cellular Broadcast Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[6]  Enrico Magli,et al.  Sliding-Window Raptor Codes for Efficient Scalable Wireless Video Broadcasting With Unequal Loss Protection , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Shih-Kai Lee,et al.  Fountain Codes With PAPR Constraint for Multicast Communications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[8]  Joong Bum Rhim,et al.  Fountain Codes , 2010 .

[9]  Luc Vandendorpe,et al.  Joint Source–Channel Turbo Techniques for Discrete-Valued Sources: From Theory to Practice , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Dejan Vukobratovic,et al.  Expanding Window Fountain Codes for Unequal Error Protection , 2007, 2007 Conference Record of the Forty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[11]  Nazanin Rahnavard,et al.  Rateless Codes With Unequal Error Protection Property , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Zixiang Xiong,et al.  Combined Source-Channel Coding of Images under Power and Bandwidth Constraints , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[13]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  A general joint source-channel matching method for wireless video transmission , 1999, Proceedings DCC'99 Data Compression Conference (Cat. No. PR00096).

[14]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  SVEF: an open-source experimental evaluation framework for H.264 scalable video streaming , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications.

[15]  Shakeel Ahmad,et al.  Unequal Error Protection Using Fountain Codes With Applications to Video Communication , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[16]  Robert J. Piechocki,et al.  Fountain code design for data multicast with side information , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[17]  David Gomez-Barquero,et al.  Application Layer FEC for Mobile TV Delivery in IP Datacast Over DVB-H Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[18]  Hui Wang,et al.  Robust video multicast with joint network coding and AL-FEC , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.