In this paper, the development of the Internet from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 is analysed to define current trends and discover future potential trends. Furthermore, a definition of these different stages is made and supported with examples. Starting with Web 1.0 and the corresponding e-procurement, e-shop and e-marketplace, the first e-business activities are defined. Thereafter, Web 2.0 is determined by innovative e-community systems. Finally, Web 3.0 is characterised by e-customization and e-request platforms. This article creates a clearer understanding of the development of the Internet, defines current trends, and discovers potential trends. a production factor will increasingly become important and will lead to the development of new innovative business ideas. In recent years, many business ventures were based on this production factor. The Web 1.0 in particular is characterized by supply-orientated systems, e.g. the focus is on the supply of items or services. Accordingly, private and commercial businessmen use the Internet as another distribution channel to offer their products to the market. Supply-side database systems are used, which were filled with relevant information about the product or service and in which the potential buyer could search for offers that mostly match with his individual needs. Therefore, the products and services are electronically recorded by companies. Corresponding eOffer-, eSalesor eTrading-processes are transacted on the platforms E-Procurement, E-Shop and E-Marketplace (Kollmann, 2011b). DOI: 10.4018/jeei.2011010102 International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2(1), 16-25, January-March 2011 17 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. The Web 2.0 is characterised by network systems that connect private and commercial users through the Internet and therefore build up a network of relationships. In this case, the communication via the eNetworking-process stands at the centre, which is transacted by ECommunity platforms (Kollmann, 2011b). The contact between the users is of central concern, whereby the communication may relate to private or business content. This development is both a blessing and a curse, since by the rising flood of information a simple overview of the Internet is for the user not given anymore. In this context, time savings through a quick access to desired information no longer exist, because of the massive amount of content on the Internet it increasingly takes more time to find the desired information. For this reason, a new technological generation is needed, which helps users to deal with these challenges. The Web 3.0 is based on these challenges and represents a demand-orientated system, where demand-driven products and services are provided. Consequently, following this logic from the Web 1.0 to the Web 2.0, the Web 3.0 is in particular characterized by demand-orientated platforms, e.g. the demand for products and services is at the centre. Starting point here are demand-side detection and specification systems with appropriate selection and entry fields to capture the demand request or the personal need of a potential buyer, so that it is possible for a company to offer an individual product or service (Kollmann, 2011b). This customization determines the difference between a supply-side and a demand-side database request. Corresponding eRequest and eCustomization processes are transacted on E-Desk platforms. This development is summarized in Figure 1. The rapid development of the Internet is facing the question of how the technology and market-oriented future can handle the increasing flood of information and how to deal with this inherent future challenges. This requires a deeper characterization of the three generations (Web 1.0, Web 2.0, Web 3.0) to create a better understanding of this development and to discover trends for 2020. 2 WEB 1.0: E-PROCUREMENT, E-SHOP, AND E-MARKETPLACE The Web 1.0 is in particular characterized by a supply-orientated system, so that the availability of products and services is given. In this context, three different business models (E-Procurement, E-Shop, E-Marketplace) can be distinguished. E-Procurement-Systems The term E-Procurement consists of the words “electronic” and “procurement” and thus describes the electronic purchase via digital networks. This leads to an integration of innovative information and communication technologies to support operational, tactical and strategic tasks in the procurement area (Kollmann, 2006). The idea of E-Procurement is based on the relevant procurement activities between a businessmen (buyer) and a vendor (seller), which are settled via the Internet and the associated conditions of the electronic information exchange. The increasing mobility of procurement activities is a key trend in E-Procurement (Mobile Procurement). Both cost and time saving as well as flexibility and quality advantages can be realized through mobile procurement. In this case, mobile devices play an important role, because e.g. mobile orders or mobile payments can lead to competitive advantages (Ng & Yip, 2010). Companies worldwide are using mobile technologies such as laptops or cell phones increasingly to undertake procurement activities independent of place and time. Thus, company intern and cross-company processes with suppliers and partners will be revolutionized, which will open up new opportunities for companies and application developers. Two interfaces are particularly responsible for the uniform implementation of mobile procurement processes. With Mobile Availability Checks users can verify the availability of products or spare parts with their mobile device. After checking the availability an immediate booking or ordering is possible, without necessarily being in the business premises of 8 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/innovative-electronicbusiness/52780?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Business, Administration, and Management. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
[1]
Alain Fayolle,et al.
Necessity Entrepreneurship and Job Insecurity: The Hidden Face of Entrepreneurship
,
2011,
Int. J. E Entrepreneurship Innov..
[2]
Chen Jin,et al.
Innovation in Business and Enterprise: Technologies and Frameworks
,
2010
.
[3]
Tobias Kollmann.
The matching function for electronic market places: determining the probability of coordinating of supply and demand
,
2005,
Int. J. Electron. Bus..
[4]
R. Dhar,et al.
Contingent Response to Self-Customization Procedures: Implications for Decision Satisfaction and Choice
,
2009
.
[5]
Andreas Kuckertz,et al.
Antecedents to Permission Based Mobile Marketing: An Initial Examination
,
2007
.
[6]
Tim O'Reilly,et al.
What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software
,
2007
.
[7]
Paul A. Pavlou,et al.
Psychological Contract Violation in Online Marketplaces: Antecedents, Consequences, and Moderating Role
,
2005,
Inf. Syst. Res..
[8]
Isabel Anger,et al.
Encouraging User-Generated Content with a Conceptional Social Media Communication Process Model
,
2012,
Int. J. E Entrepreneurship Innov..
[9]
Irene C. L. Ng,et al.
Theoretical foundations in the pricing of intermediating services: The case of payments via mobile phones
,
2010
.
[10]
Tobias Kollmann,et al.
Organizational readiness and the adoption of electronic business: the moderating role of national culture in 29 european countries
,
2009,
DATB.
[11]
Ruth Alas,et al.
Links between Innovation, Change and Learning in Chinese Companies
,
2010
.
[12]
Pnina Shachaf,et al.
A structuration approach to online communities of practice: The case of Q&A communities
,
2010,
AMCIS 2010.
[13]
Joseph Farrell,et al.
Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation
,
1985
.
[14]
T. Kollmann.
What is e-entrepreneurship? – fundamentals of company founding in the net economy
,
2006
.
[15]
Michael J. Shaw,et al.
Success Factors and Impacts of Mobile Business Applications: Results from a Mobile e-Procurement Study
,
2004,
Int. J. Electron. Commer..